Prefrontal Single-Neuron Responses after Changes in Task Contingencies during Trace Eyeblink Conditioning in Rabbits.

Jennifer J Siegel
Author Information
  1. Jennifer J Siegel: Center for Learning and Memory and the Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin , Austin, Texas 78712. ORCID

Abstract

A number of studies indicate that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) plays a role in mediating the expression of behavioral responses during tasks that require flexible changes in behavior. During trace eyeblink conditioning, evidence suggests that the mPFC provides the cerebellum with a persistent input to bridge the temporal gap between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Therefore, the mPFC is in a position to directly mediate the expression of trace conditioned responses. However, it is unknown whether persistent neural responses are associated with the flexible expression of behavior when task contingencies are changed during trace eyeblink conditioning. To investigate this, single-unit activity was recorded in the mPFC of rabbits during extinction and reacquisition of trace eyeblink conditioning, and during training to a different conditional stimulus. Persistent responses remained unchanged after full extinction, and also did not change during reacquisition training. During training to a different tone, however, the generalization of persistent responses to the new stimulus was associated with an animal's performance-when persistent responses generalized to the new tone, performance was high (>50% response rate). When persistent responses decreased to baseline rates, performance was poor (<50% response rate). The data suggest that persistent mPFC responses do not appear to mediate flexible changes in the expression of the original learning, but do appear to play a role in the generalization of that learning when the task is modified.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):50-64 [PMID: 21957220]
  2. Behav Neurosci. 2000 Dec;114(6):1058-67 [PMID: 11142638]
  3. J Neurosci. 2004 Jun 2;24(22):5131-9 [PMID: 15175382]
  4. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Feb;12(2):190-9 [PMID: 19169252]
  5. J Neurosci. 2003 Mar 1;23(5):1622-30 [PMID: 12629166]
  6. J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jan;99(1):60-76 [PMID: 17959742]
  7. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug;104(2):627-40 [PMID: 20484534]
  8. Behav Neurosci. 2001 Oct;115(5):1029-38 [PMID: 11584915]
  9. J Neurosci. 2013 Aug 14;33(33):13518-32 [PMID: 23946410]
  10. Cereb Cortex. 2003 Nov;13(11):1219-31 [PMID: 14576213]
  11. J Neurosci. 2013 Sep 18;33(38):15272-84 [PMID: 24048856]
  12. Prog Brain Res. 1990;85:501-19 [PMID: 2094912]
  13. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Jan;36(2):529-38 [PMID: 20962768]
  14. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):226-38 [PMID: 21940608]
  15. Learn Mem. 2009 Jan 07;16(1):86-95 [PMID: 19144967]
  16. Brain. 1995 Feb;118 ( Pt 1):279-306 [PMID: 7895011]
  17. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov 1;112(9):2123-37 [PMID: 25080570]
  18. eNeuro. 2015 Jul 10;2(4):null [PMID: 26464998]
  19. J Neurosci. 1999 Dec 15;19(24):10940-7 [PMID: 10594075]
  20. J Neurosci. 1998 Nov 1;18(21):9139-51 [PMID: 9787016]
  21. J Comp Neurol. 2014 Sep 1;522(13):3052-74 [PMID: 24639247]
  22. Cerebellum. 2014 Feb;13(1):64-78 [PMID: 24013852]
  23. Science. 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):960-3 [PMID: 18988855]
  24. J Neurosci. 2003 Oct 29;23(30):9897-905 [PMID: 14586019]
  25. Behav Neurosci. 2011 Jun;125(3):318-26 [PMID: 21517143]
  26. Behav Neurosci. 1992 Aug;106(4):666-81 [PMID: 1503659]
  27. Learn Mem. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):366-75 [PMID: 16705135]
  28. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Oct;1(1):59-65 [PMID: 11252769]
  29. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011 Oct;96(3):417-31 [PMID: 21855643]
  30. Learn Behav. 2005 Aug;33(3):343-62 [PMID: 16396081]
  31. J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 15;30(50):16922-37 [PMID: 21159963]
  32. J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 22;34(4):1432-45 [PMID: 24453332]
  33. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1998 Mar;69(2):147-62 [PMID: 9619994]
  34. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Apr;18(2):182-92 [PMID: 1583447]

MeSH Term

Action Potentials
Animals
Auditory Perception
Blinking
Cerebellum
Conditioning, Eyelid
Executive Function
Extinction, Psychological
Feedback, Psychological
Generalization, Psychological
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Neurons
Neuropsychological Tests
Prefrontal Cortex
Rabbits
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0responsespersistentmPFCtraceconditioningexpressionflexibleeyeblinktrainingprefrontalcortexrolechangesbehaviorconditionedmediateassociatedtaskactivityextinctionreacquisitiondifferentstimulustonegeneralizationnewperformanceresponserateappearlearningnumberstudiesindicatemedialplaysmediatingbehavioraltasksrequireevidencesuggestsprovidescerebelluminputbridgetemporalgapunconditionedstimuliThereforepositiondirectlyHoweverunknownwhetherneuralcontingencieschangedinvestigatesingle-unitrecordedrabbitsconditionalPersistentremainedunchangedfullalsochangehoweveranimal'sperformance-whengeneralizedhigh>50%decreasedbaselineratespoor<50%datasuggestoriginalplaymodifiedPrefrontalSingle-NeuronResponsesChangesTaskContingenciesTraceEyeblinkConditioningRabbitsclassicalexecutivefunctionworkingmemory

Similar Articles

Cited By