Invariant polar bear habitat selection during a period of sea ice loss.

Ryan R Wilson, Eric V Regehr, Karyn D Rode, Michelle St Martin
Author Information
  1. Ryan R Wilson: US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 E Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503, USA ryan_r_wilson@fws.gov. ORCID
  2. Eric V Regehr: US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 E Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503, USA. ORCID
  3. Karyn D Rode: US Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA.
  4. Michelle St Martin: US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 E Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503, USA.

Abstract

Climate change is expected to alter many species' habitat. A species' ability to adjust to these changes is partially determined by their ability to adjust habitat selection preferences to new environmental conditions. Sea ice loss has forced polar bears (Ursus maritimus) to spend longer periods annually over less productive waters, which may be a primary driver of population declines. A negative population response to greater time spent over less productive water implies, however, that prey are not also shifting their space use in response to sea ice loss. We show that polar bear habitat selection in the Chukchi Sea has not changed between periods before and after significant sea ice loss, leading to a 75% reduction of highly selected habitat in summer. Summer was the only period with loss of highly selected habitat, supporting the contention that summer will be a critical period for polar bears as sea ice loss continues. Our results indicate that bears are either unable to shift selection patterns to reflect new prey use patterns or that there has not been a shift towards polar basin waters becoming more productive for prey. Continued sea ice loss is likely to further reduce habitat with population-level consequences for polar bears.

Keywords

References

  1. Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):724-37 [PMID: 25783745]
  2. Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):634-51 [PMID: 26214910]
  3. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0142213 [PMID: 26580809]
  4. Glob Chang Biol. 2012 Sep;18(9):2694-706 [PMID: 24501049]
  5. Integr Comp Biol. 2004 Apr;44(2):163-76 [PMID: 21680496]
  6. Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3554-65 [PMID: 20120822]
  7. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jan;20(1):76-88 [PMID: 23913506]
  8. J Anim Ecol. 2013 Nov;82(6):1183-91 [PMID: 24499379]
  9. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0128520 [PMID: 26061693]
  10. Ecol Evol. 2015 Jul;5(14):2851-64 [PMID: 26306171]
  11. Science. 2008 Oct 10;322(5899):261-4 [PMID: 18845755]
  12. Ecology. 2013 Jul;94(7):1456-63 [PMID: 23951705]
  13. Ecology. 2011 Mar;92(3):583-9 [PMID: 21608467]

MeSH Term

Animals
Climate Change
Ecosystem
Ice Cover
Population Dynamics
Predatory Behavior
Seasons
Ursidae

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0habitatlossicepolarselectionseabearsproductivepreybearperiodchangespecies'abilityadjustnewSeaperiodslesswaterspopulationresponseusehighlyselectedsummershiftpatternsClimateexpectedaltermanychangespartiallydeterminedpreferencesenvironmentalconditionsforcedUrsusmaritimusspendlongerannuallymayprimarydriverdeclinesnegativegreatertimespentwaterimplieshoweveralsoshiftingspaceshowChukchichangedsignificantleading75%reductionSummersupportingcontentionwillcriticalcontinuesresultsindicateeitherunablereflecttowardsbasinbecomingContinuedlikelyreducepopulation-levelconsequencesInvariantclimateresource

Similar Articles

Cited By (9)