Yield of new versus reused endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration needles: A retrospective analysis of 500 patients.

Sahajal Dhooria, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, Nalini Gupta, Babu Ram, Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal, Digambar Behera, Ritesh Agarwal
Author Information
  1. Sahajal Dhooria: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  2. Inderpaul Singh Sehgal: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  3. Nalini Gupta: Department of Cytology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  4. Babu Ram: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  5. Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  6. Digambar Behera: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  7. Ritesh Agarwal: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) requires a dedicated needle for aspiration of mediastinal lesions. There is no data on reuse of these needles.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA with either new or reused EBUS-TBNA needles. The needles were reused after thorough cleaning with filtered water and organic cleaning solution, disinfection with 2.4% glutaraldehyde solution followed by ethylene oxide sterilization. The yield of EBUS-TBNA was compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 500 EBUS-TBNA procedures (351 new, 149 reused needles) were performed. The baseline characteristics were different in the two groups with suspected granulomatous disorders (sarcoidosis or tuberculosis) being significantly more common in the new compared to the reused needle group. Similarly, the median, interquartile range number of lymph node stations sampled, and the total number of passes were significantly higher in the new versus the reused needle group. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher with new needle as compared to reused needle (65.2% vs. 53.7%, P = 0.02). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, clinical suspicion of granulomatous disorders (odds ratio 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.20-2.87], P = 0.005) was the only predictor of diagnostic yield, after adjusting for the type of needle (new or reused), total number of passes and the number of lymph node stations sampled. No case of mediastinitis was encountered in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: The yield of EBUS-TBNA might be similar with single reuse of needles as compared to new needles. However, reuse of needle should be performed only when absolutely necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. Respir Med. 2012 Jun;106(6):883-92 [PMID: 22417738]
  2. J Cancer Res Ther. 2010 Apr-Jun;6(2):134-41 [PMID: 20622358]
  3. Lung India. 2015 Jan-Feb;32(1):6-10 [PMID: 25624588]
  4. Chest. 2014 Sep;146(3):547-56 [PMID: 24481031]
  5. Int J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;4(1):1-5 [PMID: 23413398]
  6. Indian J Med Res. 2013 Apr;137(4):803-7 [PMID: 23703351]
  7. Respir Care. 2013 Apr;58(4):683-93 [PMID: 23050747]
  8. Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1):122-8 [PMID: 15249452]
  9. Thorax. 2006 Sep;61(9):795-8 [PMID: 16738038]
  10. Chest. 2015 May;147(5):1401-12 [PMID: 25940251]
  11. Int J Clin Pract. 2012 May;66(5):438-45 [PMID: 22512605]
  12. J Hosp Infect. 2000 Aug;45(4):278-82 [PMID: 10973744]
  13. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2013 Nov 25;30(3):186-93 [PMID: 24284291]
  14. Am J Infect Control. 2007 Nov;35(9):574-81 [PMID: 17980234]
  15. Respir Care. 2015 Jul;60(7):1040-50 [PMID: 25759463]
  16. Natl Med J India. 2011 May-Jun;24(3):136-9 [PMID: 21786840]
  17. Chest. 2015 Sep;148(3):739-45 [PMID: 25811287]
  18. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):1894-8 [PMID: 25912747]
  19. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Feb;35(2):332-5; discussion 335-6 [PMID: 18952453]
  20. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Aug;148(2):662-7 [PMID: 24534680]
  21. Endosc Ultrasound. 2012 Jul;1(2):69-74 [PMID: 24949340]
  22. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(18):1-75, iii-iv [PMID: 22472180]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0needlenewreusedneedlesEBUS-TBNAyieldcomparednumberultrasoundaspirationreusetotalsignificantlygrouptransbronchialretrospectivepatientseithercleaningsolutiontwogroups500performedgranulomatousdisorderssarcoidosistuberculosislymphnodestationssampledpasseshigherversusdiagnosticP=0analysis1endobronchialBACKGROUND:EndobronchialEBUS-guidedTBNArequiresdedicatedmediastinallesionsdataMETHODS:studyunderwentthoroughfilteredwaterorganicdisinfection24%glutaraldehydefollowedethyleneoxidesterilizationRESULTS:procedures351149baselinecharacteristicsdifferentsuspectedcommonSimilarlymedianinterquartilerange652%vs537%02multivariatelogisticregressionclinicalsuspicionoddsratio86[95%confidenceinterval20-287]005predictoradjustingtypecasemediastinitisencounteredCONCLUSIONS:mightsimilarsingleHoweverabsolutelynecessaryYieldultrasound-guidedneedles:Ebusendoscopiceuslungcancertbna

Similar Articles

Cited By