Four Functionally Distinct Regions in the Left Supramarginal Gyrus Support Word Processing.

M Oberhuber, T M H Hope, M L Seghier, O Parker Jones, S Prejawa, D W Green, C J Price
Author Information
  1. M Oberhuber: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
  2. T M H Hope: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
  3. M L Seghier: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
  4. O Parker Jones: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
  5. S Prejawa: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
  6. D W Green: Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
  7. C J Price: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Abstract

We used fMRI in 85 healthy participants to investigate whether different parts of the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG) are involved in processing phonological inputs and outputs. The experiment involved 2 tasks (speech production (SP) and one-back (OB) matching) on 8 different types of stimuli that systematically varied the demands on sensory processing (visual vs. auditory), sublexical phonological input (words and pseudowords vs. nonverbal stimuli), and semantic content (words and objects vs. pseudowords and meaningless baseline stimuli). In ventral SMG, we found an anterior subregion associated with articulatory sequencing (for SP > OB matching) and a posterior subregion associated with auditory short-term memory (for all auditory > visual stimuli and written words and pseudowords > objects). In dorsal SMG, a posterior subregion was most highly activated by words, indicating a role in the integration of sublexical and lexical cues. In anterior dorsal SMG, activation was higher for both pseudoword reading and object naming compared with word reading, which is more consistent with executive demands than phonological processing. The dissociation of these four "functionally-distinct" regions, all within left SMG, has implications for differentiating between different types of phonological processing, understanding the functional anatomy of language and predicting the effect of brain damage.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2012 May 28;3:161 [PMID: 22654779]
  2. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Sep;19(9):2156-65 [PMID: 19181696]
  3. J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 15;30(50):16809-17 [PMID: 21159952]
  4. Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:419-33 [PMID: 24904992]
  5. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jun;19(6):1474-85 [PMID: 18987393]
  6. Neuroimage. 2005 Sep;27(3):694-705 [PMID: 15961322]
  7. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jul;18(7):1147-55 [PMID: 16839288]
  8. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 06;8:246 [PMID: 24834043]
  9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Aug 15;13(6):829-43 [PMID: 11564326]
  10. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 04;8(9):e73382 [PMID: 24023866]
  11. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Mar;19(3):433-44 [PMID: 17335392]
  12. Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 1;33(2):430-48 [PMID: 16949304]
  13. Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):859-70 [PMID: 12377160]
  14. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1347-52 [PMID: 22401989]
  15. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Apr 1;15(3):372-93 [PMID: 12729490]
  16. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Mar;31(3):365-77 [PMID: 19777554]
  17. J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):727-33 [PMID: 23964595]
  18. Cereb Cortex. 2013 Mar;23(3):615-28 [PMID: 22375016]
  19. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Nov;23(3):140-55 [PMID: 15449358]
  20. J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 31;27(5):1184-9 [PMID: 17267574]
  21. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Nov;17(11):1753-65 [PMID: 16269111]
  22. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):71-84 [PMID: 12590844]
  23. Neuroimage. 2005 Sep;27(3):677-93 [PMID: 15921937]
  24. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Mar;30(3):859-73 [PMID: 18330870]
  25. Neuroimage. 1995 Jun;2(2):157-65 [PMID: 9343598]
  26. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Mar;27(3):593-604 [PMID: 25244114]
  27. Hum Brain Mapp. 1997;5(2):84-92 [PMID: 10096413]
  28. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Nov;28(11):1194-205 [PMID: 17266101]
  29. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 16;31(11):4087-100 [PMID: 21411650]
  30. Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):205-18 [PMID: 10677038]
  31. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):488-99 [PMID: 15641437]
  32. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 19;7:787 [PMID: 24312042]
  33. Brain Lang. 2013 May;125(2):203-14 [PMID: 22632813]
  34. Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt B):1208-1212 [PMID: 25882753]
  35. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 [PMID: 5146491]
  36. Neuroimage. 2005 Jul 15;26(4):975-85 [PMID: 15893473]
  37. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Nov;19(11):1768-75 [PMID: 17958480]
  38. Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1203-6 [PMID: 12414260]
  39. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Feb;20(2):315-27 [PMID: 19478033]
  40. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jan 31;8:24 [PMID: 24550807]
  41. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12 Suppl 2:145-56 [PMID: 11506654]
  42. Neuroimage. 2004 Jun;22(2):562-73 [PMID: 15193584]
  43. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Nov;10(6):766-77 [PMID: 9831743]
  44. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 May;22(5):943-54 [PMID: 19366285]
  45. Brain Lang. 2009 Oct;111(1):66-72 [PMID: 19616296]
  46. Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):870-6 [PMID: 12880815]
  47. Brain. 1997 May;120 ( Pt 5):739-59 [PMID: 9183247]
  48. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1989 Mar;118(1):13-42 [PMID: 2522504]

Grants

  1. 091593/Wellcome Trust
  2. 097720/Wellcome Trust
  3. MR/M023672/1/Medical Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SMGprocessingphonologicalstimuliwordsdifferentvssubregionleftinvolvedspeechSPmatchingtypesdemandsauditorysublexicalpseudowordsanteriorassociatedposteriordorsalreadingfunctionallanguageusedfMRI85healthyparticipantsinvestigatewhetherpartssupramarginalgyrusinputsoutputsexperiment2tasksproduction one-backOB8systematicallyvariedsensoryvisualinputnonverbalsemanticcontentobjectsmeaninglessbaselineventralfoundarticulatorysequencing> OBshort-termmemoryauditory > visualwrittenpseudowords > objectshighlyactivatedindicatingroleintegrationlexicalcuesactivationhigherpseudowordobjectnamingcomparedwordconsistentexecutivedissociationfour"functionally-distinct"regionswithinimplicationsdifferentiatingunderstandinganatomypredictingeffectbraindamageFourFunctionallyDistinctRegionsLeftSupramarginalGyrusSupportWordProcessingMRIparietallobeproduction

Similar Articles

Cited By