Do Hospitalized Premature Infants Benefit from Music Interventions? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Marianne J E van der Heijden, Sadaf Oliai Araghi, Johannes Jeekel, Irwin K M Reiss, M G Myriam Hunink, Monique van Dijk
Author Information
Marianne J E van der Heijden: Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. ORCID
Sadaf Oliai Araghi: Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Johannes Jeekel: Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Irwin K M Reiss: Department of Neonatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M G Myriam Hunink: Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Monique van Dijk: Department of Paediatrics, division of Neonatology and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Intensive care Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
OBJECTIVE: Neonatal intensive care units (NICU) around the world increasingly use music interventions. The most recent systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) dates from 2009. Since then, 15 new RCTs have been published. We provide an updated systematic review on the possible benefits of music interventions on premature infants' well-being. METHODS: We searched 13 electronic databases and 12 journals from their first available date until August 2016. Included were all RCTs published in English with at least 10 participants per group, including infants born prematurely and admitted to the NICU. Interventions were either recorded music interventions or live music therapy interventions. All control conditions were accepted as long as the effects of the music intervention could be analysed separately. A meta-analysis was not possible due to incompleteness and heterogeneity of the data. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates the searches retrieved 4893 citations, 20 of which fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The 20 included studies encompassed 1128 participants receiving recorded or live music interventions in the NICU between 24 and 40 weeks gestational age. Twenty-six different outcomes were reported which we classified into three categories: physiological parameters; growth and feeding; behavioural state, relaxation outcomes and pain. Live music interventions were shown to improve sleep in three out of the four studies and heart rate in two out of the four studies. Recorded music improved heart rate in two out of six studies. Better feeding and sucking outcomes were reported in one study using live music and in two studies using recorded music. CONCLUSIONS: Although music interventions show promising results in some studies, the variation in quality of the studies, age groups, outcome measures and timing of the interventions across the studies makes it difficult to draw strong conclusions on the effects of music in premature infants.
References
J Music Ther. 1991 Winter;28(4):180-92
[PMID: 10160836]
