Environmental risk assessment of pesticides in the River Madre de Dios, Costa Rica using PERPEST, SSD, and msPAF models.

Robert A Rämö, Paul J van den Brink, Clemens Ruepert, Luisa E Castillo, Jonas S Gunnarsson
Author Information
  1. Robert A Rämö: Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences (DEEP), Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden. robert.ramo@su.se.
  2. Paul J van den Brink: Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  3. Clemens Ruepert: Central American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances (IRET), Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica.
  4. Luisa E Castillo: Central American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances (IRET), Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica.
  5. Jonas S Gunnarsson: Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences (DEEP), Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

This study assesses the ecological risks (ERA) of pesticides to aquatic organisms in the River Madre de Dios (RMD), which receives surface runoff water from banana, pineapple, and rice plantations on the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. Water samples collected over 2 years at five sites in the RMD revealed a total of 26 pesticides. Their toxicity risk to aquatic organisms was assessed using three recent ERA models. (1) The PERPEST model showed a high probability (>50 %) of clear toxic effects of pesticide mixtures on algae, macrophytes, zooplankton, macroinvertebrates, and community metabolism and a low probability (<50 %) of clear effects on fish. (2) Species sensitivity distributions (SSD) showed a moderate to high risk of three herbicides: ametryn, bromacil, diuron and four insecticides: carbaryl, diazinon, ethoprophos, terbufos. (3) The multi-substance potentially affected fraction (msPAF) model showed results consistent with PERPEST: high risk to algae (maximum msPAF: 73 %), aquatic plants (61 %), and arthropods (25 %) and low risk to fish (0.2 %) from pesticide mixtures. The pesticides posing the highest risks according to msPAF and that should be substituted with less toxic substances were the herbicides ametryn, diuron, the insecticides carbaryl, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, ethoprophos, and the fungicide difenoconazole. Ecological risks were highest near the plantations and decreased progressively further downstream. The risk to fish was found to be relatively low in these models, but water samples were not collected during fish kill events and some highly toxic pesticides known to be used were not analyzed for in this study. Further sampling and analysis of water samples is needed to determine toxicity risks to fish during peaks of pesticide mixture concentrations. The msPAF model, which estimates the ecological risks of mixtures based on their toxic modes of action, was found to be the most suitable model to assess toxicity risks to aquatic organisms in the RMD. The PERPEST model was found to be a strong tool for screening risk assessments. The SSD approach is useful in deriving water quality criteria for specific pesticides. This study, through the application of three ERA models, clearly shows that pesticides used in plantations within the RMD watershed are expected to have severe adverse effects on most groups of aquatic organisms and that actions are urgently needed to reduce pesticide pollution in this high biodiversity ecosystem.

Keywords

References

  1. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2000 May;46(1):1-18 [PMID: 10805987]
  2. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Feb;24(2):379-88 [PMID: 15719998]
  3. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Jan;5(1):38-49 [PMID: 19431290]
  4. Mar Pollut Bull. 2002;45(1-12):192-202 [PMID: 12398385]
  5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Mar;23 (6):5983-91 [PMID: 26832877]
  6. Ecotoxicology. 2012 Nov;21(8):2306-18 [PMID: 22875367]
  7. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Dec;49(3):183-94 [PMID: 17804132]
  8. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002 Nov;21(11):2500-6 [PMID: 12389932]
  9. Sci Total Environ. 2006 Aug 15;367(1):418-32 [PMID: 16643988]
  10. Aquat Toxicol. 2003 Mar 17;63(1):43-63 [PMID: 12615420]
  11. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Nov;32(11):2576-83 [PMID: 24115123]
  12. Sci Total Environ. 2012 Dec 1;440:106-14 [PMID: 23040047]
  13. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Sep;20(9):6070-84 [PMID: 23532537]
  14. J Environ Biol. 2014 Jan;35(1):73-84 [PMID: 24579523]
  15. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2007 Jan;3(1):49-67 [PMID: 17283595]
  16. Microb Ecol. 2013 May;65(4):995-1010 [PMID: 23314096]
  17. J Environ Biol. 2014 Jan;35(1):43-55 [PMID: 24579520]
  18. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012 Feb;31(2):228-9 [PMID: 22095471]
  19. Environ Pollut. 2014 Jun;189:126-33 [PMID: 24657606]
  20. Chemosphere. 2006 Oct;65(4):618-26 [PMID: 16540149]
  21. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Oct;24(10):2665-76 [PMID: 16268170]
  22. Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Oct 1;43(19):7556-63 [PMID: 19848176]
  23. Ecotoxicology. 2010 Jan;19(1):24-37 [PMID: 19705279]
  24. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2011 Oct;7(4):577-86 [PMID: 21438132]
  25. Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32(7):1232-43 [PMID: 22050459]
  26. Environ Pollut. 2003;122(2):245-51 [PMID: 12531313]
  27. Ecotoxicology. 2011 Jun;20(4):625-34 [PMID: 21267648]
  28. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2011 Oct;7(4):vi-viii [PMID: 21932339]

Grants

  1. 2007-282/Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
  2. Minor Field Study/Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete

MeSH Term

Animals
Aquatic Organisms
Costa Rica
Ecosystem
Environmental Monitoring
Herbicides
Models, Theoretical
Pesticides
Risk Assessment
Rivers
Water Pollutants, Chemical

Chemicals

Herbicides
Pesticides
Water Pollutants, Chemical

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pesticidesriskrisksaquaticmodelfishERAorganismsRMDwatertoxicitymodelshightoxicpesticidemsPAFstudyplantationssamplesthreePERPESTshowedeffectsmixtureslowSSDfoundecologicalRiverMadredeDiosrunoffCostaRicacollectedusingprobabilityclearalgaeametryndiuroncarbaryldiazinonethoprophoshighestusedneededpollutionassessesreceivessurfacebananapineapplericeCaribbeancoastWater2 yearsfivesitesrevealedtotal26assessedrecent1>50 %macrophyteszooplanktonmacroinvertebratescommunitymetabolism<50 %2Speciessensitivitydistributionsmoderateherbicides:bromacilfourinsecticides:terbufos3multi-substancepotentiallyaffectedfractionresultsconsistentPERPEST:maximummsPAF:73 %plants61 %arthropods25 %02 %posingaccordingsubstitutedlesssubstancesherbicidesinsecticideschlorpyrifosfungicidedifenoconazoleEcologicalneardecreasedprogressivelydownstreamrelativelykilleventshighlyknownanalyzedsamplinganalysisdeterminepeaksmixtureconcentrationsestimatesbasedmodesactionsuitableassessstrongtoolscreeningassessmentsapproachusefulderivingqualitycriteriaspecificapplicationclearlyshowswithinwatershedexpectedsevereadversegroupsactionsurgentlyreducebiodiversityecosystemEnvironmentalassessmentAgriculturalAquaticCentralAmericaMixtureTropicalecotoxicity

Similar Articles

Cited By