Contextualization and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (ICAR) through simulation: Pilot investigation.

Fatemeh Keshmiri, Sari Ponzer, AmirAli Sohrabpour, Shervin Farahmand, Farhad Shahi, Shahram Bagheri-Hariri, Kamran Soltani-Arabshahi, Mandana Shirazi, Italo Masiello
Author Information
  1. Fatemeh Keshmiri: PhD Candidate in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. keshmiri_f@razi.tums.ac.ir.
  2. Sari Ponzer: Professor of Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. sari.ponzer@ki.se.
  3. AmirAli Sohrabpour: Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, aasohrabpour@tums.ac.ir.
  4. Shervin Farahmand: Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. shfarahmand@tums.ac.ir.
  5. Farhad Shahi: Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. fshahi@yahoo.com.
  6. Shahram Bagheri-Hariri: Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. hariri.shahram@gmail.com.
  7. Kamran Soltani-Arabshahi: Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. soltarab34@gmail.com.
  8. Mandana Shirazi: Post-doctoral Researcher, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, & Associate Professor, Educational Development Center, Department of Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mandana.shirazi@ki.se.
  9. Italo Masiello: Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset,, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. italo.Masiello@ki.se.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulation can be used for educating, evaluating and assessing psychometric properties of an instrument. The aim of this study was to contextualize and assess the validity and reliability of the Interprofessional Collaborative Assessment tool (ICAR) in an Iranian context using simulation.
METHODS: In this descriptive study, contextualization of the ICAR was assessed through several steps. Firstly, validity assessment was approved through expert panels and Delphi rounds. Secondly, reliability assessment was done by arranging a simulation video and assessing reproducibility, test-retest (ICC), internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha) and inter-rater reliability (Kappa).The participants included 26 experts, 27 students and 6 staff of the Standardized Simulation Office of Teheran University of Medical Sciences.
RESULTS: Contextualization and validity of the ICAR were approved in an Iranian context. The reliability of the tool was computed to be 0.71 according to Cronbach´s Alpha. The test-retest was calculated to be 0.76.
CONCLUSION: The Iranian ICAR can be a useful tool for evaluating interprofessional collaborative competencies. The development of the instrument through a simulation scenario has been a positive prospect for researchers.

Keywords

References

  1. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Mar;13(1):59-69 [PMID: 16871427]
  2. Acad Med. 2000 Nov;75(11):1130-7 [PMID: 11078676]
  3. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Dec 31;14:1049 [PMID: 25551678]
  4. J Interprof Care. 2010 Jul;24(4):336-49 [PMID: 20540613]
  5. Simul Healthc. 2013 Oct;8(5):292-303 [PMID: 23842119]
  6. Acad Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;38(3):354-60 [PMID: 24777713]
  7. Acad Med. 2000 Dec;75(12):1206-11 [PMID: 11112723]
  8. BMC Med Educ. 2012 Jan 27;12:6 [PMID: 22284898]
  9. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;13(7):727-32 [PMID: 16636361]
  10. Med Educ. 2007 Jun;41(6):537-49 [PMID: 17518833]
  11. BMC Res Notes. 2011 Sep 19;4:362 [PMID: 21929815]
  12. Med Educ. 2015 Apr;49(4):386-98 [PMID: 25800299]
  13. Simul Healthc. 2014 Oct;9(5):295-303 [PMID: 25188486]
  14. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42 [PMID: 17161752]
  15. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2003;8(1):5-16 [PMID: 12652165]
  16. Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(5):317-26 [PMID: 21114912]
  17. Acad Med. 2004 May;79(5):458-63 [PMID: 15107286]
  18. J Interprof Care. 2011 Sep;25(5):339-44 [PMID: 21732723]
  19. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2013 Jun;16(6):803-7 [PMID: 23997908]
  20. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):387-96 [PMID: 17251535]
  21. Med Teach. 2003 Nov;25(6):565-8 [PMID: 15369903]
  22. Thorax. 2009 Nov;64(11):950-5 [PMID: 19720608]
  23. Simul Healthc. 2008 Winter;3(4):224-38 [PMID: 19088667]
  24. J Surg Res. 2007 Oct;142(2):304-7 [PMID: 17719066]
  25. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(7):625-9 [PMID: 18236247]
  26. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;82(6):1219-27 [PMID: 25090041]
  27. J Interprof Care. 2009 May;23(3):297-300 [PMID: 19242851]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ICARreliabilityvalidityInterprofessionaltoolIraniansimulationassessmentSimulationcanevaluatingassessinginstrumentstudyAssessmentcontextapprovedtest-retestAlphaContextualization0interprofessionalBACKGROUND:usededucatingpsychometricpropertiesaimcontextualizeassessCollaborativeusingMETHODS:descriptivecontextualizationassessedseveralstepsFirstlyexpertpanelsDelphiroundsSecondlydonearrangingvideoreproducibilityICCinternalconsistencyCronbach'sinter-raterKappaTheparticipantsincluded26experts27students6staffStandardizedOfficeTeheranUniversityMedicalSciencesRESULTS:computed71accordingCronbach´scalculated76CONCLUSION:usefulcollaborativecompetenciesdevelopmentscenariopositiveprospectresearchersvalidationcollaboratorrubricsimulation:PilotinvestigationCollaborationEducationValidation

Similar Articles

Cited By