Public Health Staff Development Needs in Informatics: Findings From a National Survey of Local Health Departments.

Barbara L Massoudi, Kelley Chester, Gulzar H Shah
Author Information
  1. Barbara L Massoudi: eHealth, Quality Measurement and Health Data Analytics Division, RTI International, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Massoudi); C3 Informatics, LLC, Milton, Georgia (Dr Chester); Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro (Dr Shah).

Abstract

CONTEXT: Public health practice is information-intensive and information-driven. Public health informatics is a nascent discipline, and most public health practitioners lack necessary skills in this area.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the staff development needs of local health departments (LHDs) related to informatics.
DESIGN: Data came from the 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Survey, conducted by Georgia Southern University in collaboration with the National Association of County & City Health Officials.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 324 LHDs from all 50 states completed the survey (response rate: 50%).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Outcome measures included LHDs' specific staff development needs related to informatics. Predictors of interest included jurisdiction size and governance type.
RESULTS: Areas of workforce development and improvement in informatics staff of LHDs included using and interpreting quantitative data, designing and running reports from information systems, using and interpreting qualitative data, using statistical or other analytical software, project management, and using geographical information systems. Significant variation in informatics training needs exists depending on the size of the LHD population and governance type.
CONCLUSION: Substantial training needs exist for LHDs across many areas of informatics ranging from very basic to specialized skills and are related to the size of LHD population and governance type.

References

  1. Yearb Med Inform. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):199-206 [PMID: 26293869]
  2. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Jan-Feb;21 Suppl 1:S38-48 [PMID: 25423055]
  3. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Nov-Dec;21 Suppl 6:S5-6 [PMID: 26422494]
  4. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):688-95 [PMID: 22395299]
  5. Public Health Rep. 2016 Mar-Apr;131(2):272-82 [PMID: 26957662]
  6. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):667-9 [PMID: 25250757]
  7. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Nov-Dec;21 Suppl 6:S102-10 [PMID: 26422478]
  8. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Sep;20(9):734-40 [PMID: 25365748]
  9. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):383-5 [PMID: 23719392]
  10. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;22 Suppl 6, Public Health Informatics:S44-S50 [PMID: 27684617]
  11. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Nov-Dec;21 Suppl 6:S159-67 [PMID: 26422486]
  12. MMWR Suppl. 2012 Jul 27;61(3):20-4 [PMID: 22832993]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0informaticshealthneedsLHDsusingPublicstaffdevelopmentrelatedHealthincludedsizegovernancetypeskillsNeedsSurveyNationalinterpretingdatainformationsystemstrainingLHDpopulationCONTEXT:practiceinformation-intensiveinformation-drivennascentdisciplinepublicpractitionerslacknecessaryareaOBJECTIVE:describelocaldepartmentsDESIGN:Datacame2015InformaticsCapacityAssessmentconductedGeorgiaSouthernUniversitycollaborationAssociationCounty&CityOfficialsPARTICIPANTS:total32450statescompletedsurveyresponserate:50%MAINOUTCOMEMEASURES:OutcomemeasuresLHDs'specificPredictorsinterestjurisdictionRESULTS:AreasworkforceimprovementquantitativedesigningrunningreportsqualitativestatisticalanalyticalsoftwareprojectmanagementgeographicalSignificantvariationexistsdependingCONCLUSION:SubstantialexistacrossmanyareasrangingbasicspecializedStaffDevelopmentInformatics:FindingsLocalDepartments

Similar Articles

Cited By