Effects of magnetic field strength and b value on the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative breast diffusion-weighted MRI.

Mohammad Eghtedari, Jingfei Ma, Patricia Fox, Inanc Guvenc, Wei T Yang, Basak E Dogan
Author Information
  1. Mohammad Eghtedari: Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
  2. Jingfei Ma: Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  3. Patricia Fox: Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  4. Inanc Guvenc: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Medical Park Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  5. Wei T Yang: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  6. Basak E Dogan: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of b value or the magnetic field strength (B0) on the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
METHODS: A total of 126 patients underwent clinical breast MRI that included pre-contrast DWI imaging using b values of both 1,000 and 1,500 s/mm at either 1.5 T (n=86) or 3.0 T (n=40). Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were measured and compared for 18 benign, 33 malignant lesions, and 126 normal breast tissues. Optimal ADCmean threshold for differentiating benign and malignant lesions was estimated and the effect of b values and B0 were examined using a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model.
RESULTS: The optimal ADCmean threshold was 1.235×10 mm/s for b value of 1,000 and 0.934×10 mm/s for b value of 1,500. Using these thresholds, the sensitivities and specificities were 96% and 89% (b value =1,000, B0 =1.5 T), 89% and 98% (b value =1,000, B0 =3.0 T), 88% and 96% (b value =1,500, B0 =1.5 T), and 67% and 100% (b value =1,500, B0 =3.0 T). No significant difference was found between different B0 (P=0.26) or b values (P=0.28).
CONCLUSIONS: Better sensitivity is achieved with DWI of b value =1,000 than with b value =1,500. However, b value and B0 do not significantly impact diagnostic performance of DWI when using appropriate thresholds.

Keywords

References

  1. Radiology. 1988 Aug;168(2):497-505 [PMID: 3393671]
  2. Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):341-51 [PMID: 19703869]
  3. Jpn J Radiol. 2011 Jul;29(6):429-36 [PMID: 21786099]
  4. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1030-5 [PMID: 19770326]
  5. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Dec;76(3):386-90 [PMID: 20413239]
  6. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Mar;82(3):435-43 [PMID: 22658868]
  7. NMR Biomed. 2010 May;23(4):399-405 [PMID: 20131313]
  8. Eur Radiol. 2014 Nov;24(11):2835-47 [PMID: 25103535]
  9. Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5 [PMID: 15405679]
  10. Radiology. 1986 Nov;161(2):401-7 [PMID: 3763909]
  11. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013 May;21(2):321-36 [PMID: 23642556]
  12. Radiat Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):15-20 [PMID: 18236129]
  13. Magn Reson Med. 2001 Mar;45(3):448-53 [PMID: 11241703]
  14. Br J Radiol. 2006 Aug;79(944):633-5 [PMID: 16793851]
  15. Rofo. 2014 Feb;186(2):130-5 [PMID: 23929263]
  16. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013;12(3):229-34 [PMID: 23857152]
  17. BMC Cancer. 2012 Aug 02;12:334 [PMID: 22853049]
  18. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jul;30(1):243-8 [PMID: 19557743]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bvalueB0=11TDWI000500breast0magneticfieldstrengthsensitivitydiffusion-weightedimagingMRIusingvalues5benignmalignantlesionseffectspecificityquantitative126ADCmeanthresholdmm/sthresholds96%89%=3P=0BACKGROUND:evaluateMETHODS:totalpatientsunderwentclinicalincludedpre-contrasts/mmeithern=863n=40QuantitativeapparentdiffusioncoefficientsADCmeasuredcompared1833normaltissuesOptimaldifferentiatingestimatedexaminedgeneralizedestimatingequationsGEEmodelRESULTS:optimal235×10934×10Usingsensitivitiesspecificities98%88%67%100%significantdifferencefounddifferent2628CONCLUSIONS:BetterachievedHoweversignificantlyimpactdiagnosticperformanceappropriateEffectsBreast

Similar Articles

Cited By