Behavioral pharmacology of the odor span task: Effects of flunitrazepam, ketamine, methamphetamine and methylphenidate.

Mark Galizio, Brooke April, Melissa Deal, Andrew Hawkey, Danielle Panoz-Brown, Ashley Prichard, Katherine Bruce
Author Information
  1. Mark Galizio: Department of Psychology UNC Wilmington.
  2. Brooke April: Department of Psychology UNC Wilmington.
  3. Melissa Deal: Department of Psychology UNC Wilmington.
  4. Andrew Hawkey: Department of Psychology UNC Wilmington.
  5. Danielle Panoz-Brown: Department of Psychology UNC Wilmington.
  6. Ashley Prichard: Department of Psychology UNC Wilmington.
  7. Katherine Bruce: Department of Psychology UNC Wilmington.

Abstract

The Odor Span Task is an incrementing non-matching-to-sample procedure that permits the study of behavior under the control of multiple stimuli. Rats are exposed to a series of odor stimuli and selection of new stimuli is reinforced. Successful performance thus requires remembering which stimuli have previously been presented during a given session. This procedure has been frequently used in neurobiological studies as a rodent model of working memory; however, only a few studies have examined the effects of drugs on performance in this task. The present experiments explored the behavioral pharmacology of a modified version of the Odor Span Task by determining the effects of stimulant drugs methylphenidate and methamphetamine, NMDA antagonist ketamine, and positive GABA modulator flunitrazepam. All four drugs produced dose-dependent impairment of performances on the Odor Span Task, but for methylphenidate and methamphetamine, these occurred only at doses that had similar effects on performance of a simple odor discrimination. Generally, these disruptions were based on omission of responding at the effective doses. The effects of ketamine and flunitrazepam were more selective in some rats. That is, some rats tested under flunitrazepam and ketamine showed decreases in accuracy on the Odor Span Task at doses that did not affect simple discrimination performance. These selective effects indicate disruption of within-session stimulus control. Overall, these findings support the potential of the Odor Span Task as a baseline for the behavioral pharmacological analysis of remembering.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Dec;12 (12 ):4505-14 [PMID: 11122361]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Jul;94(1):69-81 [PMID: 21279163]
  3. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Dec 02;7:183 [PMID: 24348356]
  4. Neuropharmacology. 2007 Feb;52(2):634-45 [PMID: 17097694]
  5. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Nov;37(9 Pt B):2111-24 [PMID: 22464948]
  6. Behav Anal (Wash D C). 2016 Nov;16(4):169-178 [PMID: 27896309]
  7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 May 1;5(5):216-222 [PMID: 11323267]
  8. Neuropharmacology. 2001 Dec;41(8):916-27 [PMID: 11747896]
  9. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011 Jan;95(1):57-63 [PMID: 21074629]
  10. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Jan;225(2):397-406 [PMID: 22918519]
  11. Behav Neurosci. 2005 Apr;119(2):455-63 [PMID: 15839791]
  12. Learn Motiv. 2014 Aug 1;47:18-29 [PMID: 25242825]
  13. Learn Mem. 2013 Nov 15;20(12 ):665-9 [PMID: 24241748]
  14. J Neurosci. 2000 Apr 15;20(8):2964-77 [PMID: 10751449]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Nov;88(3):405-33 [PMID: 18047230]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Sep;104(2):133-45 [PMID: 26377436]
  17. Behav Neural Biol. 1991 Jan;55(1):61-7 [PMID: 1996948]
  18. Behav Neurosci. 1997 Aug;111(4):676-82 [PMID: 9267645]
  19. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Oct;212(2):227-42 [PMID: 20676612]
  20. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Aug;228(4):611-22 [PMID: 23529381]
  21. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Dec;36(13):2774-81 [PMID: 21956441]
  22. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Oct;114:209-16 [PMID: 25017644]
  23. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998 May;137(1):7-14 [PMID: 9631951]
  24. Learn Motiv. 2013 Aug 1;44(3):143-158 [PMID: 23729864]
  25. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;3(4):300-8 [PMID: 15040550]
  26. Neurosci Lett. 2010 Mar 3;471(2):114-8 [PMID: 20083163]
  27. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Oct;38(11):2315-25 [PMID: 23722241]
  28. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Sep;217(2):255-69 [PMID: 21484239]
  29. Behav Neurosci. 1991 Aug;105(4):521-35 [PMID: 1657031]
  30. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Jun;119(4):421-7 [PMID: 7480522]
  31. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Nov;188(4):552-66 [PMID: 16676163]

Grants

  1. R15 DA029252/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Central Nervous System Stimulants
Flunitrazepam
Ketamine
Methamphetamine
Methylphenidate
Odorants
Rats

Chemicals

Central Nervous System Stimulants
Methylphenidate
Methamphetamine
Flunitrazepam
Ketamine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0OdorSpanTaskeffectsketamineflunitrazepamstimuliperformancemethylphenidatemethamphetamineodordrugsdosesnon-matching-to-sampleprocedurecontrolrememberingstudiesbehavioralpharmacologyNMDAantagonistpositivemodulatorsimplediscriminationselectiveratsincrementingpermitsstudybehaviormultipleRatsexposedseriesselectionnewreinforcedSuccessfulthusrequirespreviouslypresentedgivensessionfrequentlyusedneurobiologicalrodentmodelworkingmemoryhoweverexaminedtaskpresentexperimentsexploredmodifiedversiondeterminingstimulantGABAfourproduceddose-dependentimpairmentperformancesoccurredsimilarGenerallydisruptionsbasedomissionrespondingeffectivetestedshoweddecreasesaccuracyaffectindicatedisruptionwithin-sessionstimulusOverallfindingssupportpotentialbaselinepharmacologicalanalysisBehavioralspantask:EffectsGABAA

Similar Articles

Cited By