Prosodic Similarity Effects in Short-Term Memory in Developmental Dyslexia.

Usha Goswami, Lisa Barnes, Natasha Mead, Alan James Power, Victoria Leong
Author Information
  1. Usha Goswami: University of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, UK. ucg10@cam.ac.uk.
  2. Lisa Barnes: University of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, UK.
  3. Natasha Mead: University of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, UK.
  4. Alan James Power: University of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, UK.

Abstract

Children with developmental dyslexia are characterized by phonological difficulties across languages. Classically, this 'phonological deficit' in dyslexia has been investigated with tasks using single-syllable words. Recently, however, several studies have demonstrated difficulties in prosodic awareness in dyslexia. Potential prosodic effects in short-term memory have not yet been investigated. Here we create a new instrument based on three-syllable words that vary in stress patterns, to investigate whether prosodic similarity (the same prosodic pattern of stressed and unstressed syllables) exerts systematic effects on short-term memory. We study participants with dyslexia and age-matched and younger reading-level-matched typically developing controls. We find that all participants, including dyslexic participants, show prosodic similarity effects in short-term memory. All participants exhibited better retention of words that differed in prosodic structure, although participants with dyslexia recalled fewer words accurately overall compared to age-matched controls. Individual differences in prosodic memory were predicted by earlier vocabulary abilities, by earlier sensitivity to syllable stress and by earlier phonological awareness. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of prosodic similarity effects in short-term memory. The implications of a prosodic similarity effect for theories of lexical representation and of dyslexia are discussed. © 2016 The Authors. Dyslexia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

References

  1. Mem Cognit. 2005 Oct;33(7):1210-9 [PMID: 16532854]
  2. Phonetica. 2009;66(1-2):113-26 [PMID: 19390234]
  3. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+ [PMID: 5541744]
  4. Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 2:761-8 [PMID: 23791839]
  5. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jan;16(1):43-54 [PMID: 25370786]
  6. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 07;10(12):e0144411 [PMID: 26641472]
  7. J Commun Disord. 2011 May-Jun;44(3):294-314 [PMID: 21329941]
  8. Mem Cognit. 1995 Jan;23(1):83-94 [PMID: 7885268]
  9. Dyslexia. 2004 Aug;10(3):215-33 [PMID: 15341199]
  10. Memory. 2001 Jul-Nov;9(4-6):333-48 [PMID: 11594356]
  11. Brain Lang. 2005 Nov;95(2):304-18 [PMID: 16246738]
  12. Dyslexia. 2010 Nov;16(4):318-40 [PMID: 20957686]
  13. J Acoust Soc Am. 1975 Jul;58(1):214-22 [PMID: 1150969]
  14. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1019-34 [PMID: 12450329]
  15. Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):3-29 [PMID: 15631549]
  16. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):180-7 [PMID: 15951161]
  17. Mem Cognit. 1988 Nov;16(6):522-32 [PMID: 3193883]
  18. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Sep;23(5):1217-32 [PMID: 9293631]
  19. Brain Lang. 1997 Feb 15;56(3):334-53 [PMID: 9070416]
  20. Mem Cognit. 1993 Mar;21(2):168-75 [PMID: 8469125]
  21. Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Feb;37:152-61 [PMID: 25463247]
  22. Br J Psychol. 1987 May;78 ( Pt 2):205-11 [PMID: 3594090]
  23. Dev Sci. 2011 Jan;14(1):34-43 [PMID: 21159086]
  24. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 27;7:777 [PMID: 24376407]
  25. Brain Lang. 1997 Sep;59(2):267-333 [PMID: 9299067]
  26. Mem Cognit. 2004 Apr;32(3):501-10 [PMID: 15285132]
  27. Brain Lang. 2016 Sep;160:1-10 [PMID: 27433986]
  28. Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):560-70 [PMID: 21236633]
  29. Dyslexia. 2016 Nov;22(4):287-304 [PMID: 27753210]

Grants

  1. G0400574/Medical Research Council

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Case-Control Studies
Child
Dyslexia
Female
Humans
Language
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Reading
Retention, Psychology
Vocabulary

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0prosodicdyslexiamemoryparticipantswordseffectsshort-termsimilarityearlierphonologicaldifficultiesinvestigatedawarenessstressage-matchedcontrolsDyslexiaChildrendevelopmentalcharacterizedacrosslanguagesClassically'phonologicaldeficit'tasksusingsingle-syllableRecentlyhoweverseveralstudiesdemonstratedPotentialyetcreatenewinstrumentbasedthree-syllablevarypatternsinvestigatewhetherpatternstressedunstressedsyllablesexertssystematicstudyyoungerreading-level-matchedtypicallydevelopingfindincludingdyslexicshowexhibitedbetterretentiondifferedstructurealthoughrecalledfeweraccuratelyoverallcomparedIndividualdifferencespredictedvocabularyabilitiessensitivitysyllableknowledgefirstdemonstrationimplicationseffecttheorieslexicalrepresentationdiscussed©2016AuthorspublishedJohnWiley&SonsLtdProsodicSimilarityEffectsShort-TermMemoryDevelopmentalphonologyprosodyserialrecall

Similar Articles

Cited By