What Would Women Choose When Given a Choice in Breast Reconstruction?

Thomas C Lam, Caleb J Winch
Author Information
  1. Thomas C Lam: Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  2. Caleb J Winch: Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Reconstruction after mastectomy is an important milestone for many women treated for breast cancer. However, because many surgeons only offer their preferred method of reconstruction, it is not clear which approach women would choose if offered a genuine choice.
METHODS: Between 1998 and 2010, the breast reconstruction service at a major Australian teaching hospital was staffed by a single plastic surgeon trained in both prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction techniques. The choices of all 837 women who underwent reconstruction were compared across time for publicly and privately funded patients using binary logistic regression.
RESULTS: Overall, women chose prosthetic over autologous reconstruction at a ratio of 4.7:1. This ratio increasingly favored prosthetic reconstruction over time, though less strongly for private patients who did not face a 3-year waiting list for autologous reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Financial constraints affected these women's reconstruction choices. Nevertheless, and in contrast to the situation in the United States, these women clearly favored prosthetic over autologous reconstruction.

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan;131(1):15-23 [PMID: 23271515]
  2. Microsurgery. 2010;30(2):151-5 [PMID: 19790182]
  3. Ann Surg. 2006 Feb;243(2):241-9 [PMID: 16432358]
  4. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Aug;128(2):353-9 [PMID: 21788827]
  5. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jul;108(1):73-7 [PMID: 11420507]
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jul;134(1):1e-10e [PMID: 25028850]
  7. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(6):229-39 [PMID: 15535852]
  8. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep;132(3):511-8 [PMID: 23676964]
  9. J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Jan;192(1):1-8 [PMID: 11192909]
  10. Psychooncology. 2014 Jul;23(7):835-8 [PMID: 24991748]
  11. Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Feb;50(2):126-31 [PMID: 12567047]
  12. JAMA. 2006 Jan 25;295(4):387-8 [PMID: 16434628]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4):588-95 [PMID: 25357021]
  14. Psychol Health. 2008;23(2):207-19 [PMID: 25160051]
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Jun;95(7):1185-94 [PMID: 7761505]
  16. ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):701-6 [PMID: 12956785]
  17. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov;215(5):658-66; discussion 666 [PMID: 22921327]
  18. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Oct;106(5):1014-25; discussion 1026-7 [PMID: 11039373]
  19. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Feb;111(2):695-703; discussion 704-5 [PMID: 12560690]
  20. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Mar;111(3):1060-8 [PMID: 12621175]
  21. Breast. 2013 Dec;22(6):1220-5 [PMID: 24128741]
  22. Breast. 2005 Jun;14(3):201-8 [PMID: 15927829]
  23. Am J Surg. 2009 Aug;198(2):237-43 [PMID: 19306977]
  24. Psychooncology. 2007 Apr;16(4):342-51 [PMID: 16874745]
  25. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2158-65 [PMID: 21308486]
  26. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;84(1-2):31-6 [PMID: 24450788]
  27. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 May;20(5):1436-43 [PMID: 23135312]
  28. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2013 Feb 25;5:9-15 [PMID: 24648753]
  29. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 1;113(4):1153-60 [PMID: 15083015]
  30. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3223-9 [PMID: 22878610]
  31. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Nov;108(6):1600-3 [PMID: 11711934]