[Clostridium difficile infection : What is currently available for treatment?]

A Stallmach
Author Information
  1. A Stallmach: Klinik für Innere Medizin IV (Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie), Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland. andreas.stallmach@med.uni-jena.de.

Abstract

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is an anaerobic, Gram-positive, spore-forming, toxin-secreting bacillus. It is transmitted via a fecal-oral route and can be found in 1-3 % of the healthy population. Symptoms caused by C. difficile range from uncomplicated diarrhea to a toxic megacolon. The incidence, frequency of recurrence, and mortality rate of C. difficile infections (CDIs) have increased significantly over the past few decades. The most important risk factor is antibiotic treatment in elderly patients and patients with severe comorbidities. There is a screening test available to detect C. difficile-specific glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), which is produced by both toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains. To confirm CDIs, it is necessary to test for toxins in a fresh, liquid stool sample via polymerase chain reaction or an enzyme-coupled immune adsorption test. If CDIs are diagnosed, then ongoing antibiotic treatment should be ended. Metronidazole is used to treat mild cases, and vancomycin is recommended for severe cases. Vancomycin or fidaxomicin should be used to treat recurrences (10-25 % of patients). In cases with several recurrences, a treatment option is fecal microbiome transfer (FMT). The cure rate following FMT is approximately 80 %. The treatment of severe and complicated CDI with a threatening toxic megacolon remains problematic. The degree of evidence of medicated treatment in this situation is low; the significance of metronidazole i. v. as an additional therapeutic measure is controversial. Tigecycline i. v. is an alternative option. Surgical treatment must be considered in patients with a toxic megacolon or an acute abdomen.

Keywords

References

  1. J Immunol. 2011 Apr 15;186(8):4872-80 [PMID: 21411735]
  2. Intern Med. 2015;54(17):2155-9 [PMID: 26328639]
  3. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;108(4):478-98; quiz 499 [PMID: 23439232]
  4. Nature. 2015 Jan 8;517(7533):205-8 [PMID: 25337874]
  5. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Jul;46(1):8-12 [PMID: 25982915]
  6. Anaerobe. 2016 Feb;37:43-8 [PMID: 26335160]
  7. N Engl J Med. 1994 Jan 27;330(4):257-62 [PMID: 8043060]
  8. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;36(7):794-801 [PMID: 25801085]
  9. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2016;25(5):541-55 [PMID: 26934513]
  10. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144604 [PMID: 26659011]
  11. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 May-Jun;38(5):414-8 [PMID: 15100520]
  12. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 1;59(3):345-54 [PMID: 24799326]
  13. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):407-15 [PMID: 23323867]
  14. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1792-801 [PMID: 26348734]
  15. Z Gastroenterol. 2015 May;53(5):418-59 [PMID: 25965989]
  16. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2016 Jul 25;:1-12 [PMID: 27410763]
  17. J Hosp Infect. 2016 Mar;92 (3):296-8 [PMID: 26810610]
  18. Infect Immun. 2012 Sep;80(9):2989-96 [PMID: 22689818]
  19. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 15;61(6):934-41 [PMID: 26024909]
  20. J Infect Dis. 2003 Dec 15;188(12):1922-7 [PMID: 14673773]
  21. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 02;2(1):e000038 [PMID: 26568840]
  22. J Bacteriol. 2010 Oct;192(19):4983-90 [PMID: 20675492]
  23. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 07;10(10):e0137252 [PMID: 26444424]
  24. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 22;16:177 [PMID: 27102582]
  25. Scientifica (Cairo). 2014;2014:916826 [PMID: 24991448]
  26. J Infect Dis. 1977 Nov;136(5):701-5 [PMID: 915343]
  27. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Sep 5;113(35-36):583-9 [PMID: 27658471]
  28. Infect Dis Ther. 2014 Dec;3(2):321-31 [PMID: 25466443]
  29. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014 Oct;16(5):744-50 [PMID: 25040545]
  30. J Med Microbiol. 2013 Sep;62(Pt 9):1453-60 [PMID: 23722431]
  31. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;12(4):281-9 [PMID: 22321770]
  32. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Oct 24;111(43):723-31 [PMID: 25404529]
  33. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Nov 21;145(10):758-64 [PMID: 17116920]
  34. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Dec 15;51(12):1406-10 [PMID: 21058913]
  35. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb;51(2):145-150 [PMID: 26974758]
  36. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):422-31 [PMID: 21288078]
  37. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):825-34 [PMID: 25714160]
  38. Z Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;52(6):549-57 [PMID: 24905106]
  39. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Jun;68(6):1305-11 [PMID: 23420839]
  40. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 04;9(6):e98400 [PMID: 24897375]

MeSH Term

Aminoglycosides
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Clostridioides difficile
Diarrhea
Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous
Evidence-Based Medicine
Fidaxomicin
Humans
Megacolon, Toxic
Metronidazole
Treatment Outcome
Vancomycin

Chemicals

Aminoglycosides
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Metronidazole
Vancomycin
Fidaxomicin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentCmegacolonpatientsdifficileCDIsseveretestcases difficileviaa toxicrateantibioticavailabledehydrogenaseusedtreatrecurrencesoptionFMTi vinfectionClostridiumanaerobicGram-positivespore-formingtoxin-secretingbacillustransmitteda fecal-oralroutecanfound1-3 %healthypopulationSymptomscausedrangeuncomplicateddiarrheaincidencefrequencyrecurrencemortalityinfectionsincreasedsignificantlypastdecadesimportantriskfactorelderlycomorbiditiesa screeningdetect difficile-specificglutamateGDHproducedtoxigenicnon-toxigenicstrainsconfirmnecessarytoxinsa freshliquidstoolsamplepolymerasechainreactionenzyme-coupledimmuneadsorptiondiagnosedongoingendedMetronidazolemildvancomycinrecommendedVancomycinfidaxomicin10-25 %severalfecalmicrobiometransfercurefollowingapproximately80 %complicatedCDIa threateningtoxicremainsproblematicdegreeevidencemedicatedsituationlowsignificancemetronidazoleadditionaltherapeuticmeasurecontroversialTigecyclinealternativeSurgicalmustconsideredacuteabdomen[Clostridium:currentlytreatment?]DiarrheaGastroenteritisinfectiousGlutamateHospital-acquiredToxic

Similar Articles

Cited By