Time-discounting and tobacco smoking: a systematic review and network analysis.

Pepita Barlow, Martin McKee, Aaron Reeves, Gauden Galea, David Stuckler
Author Information
  1. Pepita Barlow: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  2. Martin McKee: Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  3. Aaron Reeves: International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics, London, UK.
  4. Gauden Galea: Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Life-course, Regional Office for Europe, World Health OrganizationCopenhagen, Denmark.
  5. David Stuckler: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Abstract

Background: Tobacco smoking harms health, so why do people smoke and fail to quit? An explanation originating in behavioural economics suggests a role for time-discounting, which describes how the value of a reward, such as better health, decreases with delay to its receipt. A large number of studies test the relationship of time-discounting with tobacco outcomes but the temporal pattern of this relationship and its variation according to measurement methods remain unclear. We review the association between time-discounting and smoking across (i) the life course, from initiation to cessation, and (ii) diverse discount measures.
Methods: We identified 69 relevant studies in Web of Science and PubMed. We synthesized findings across methodologies and evaluated discount measures, study quality and cross-disciplinary fertilization.
Results: In 44 out of 54 studies, smokers more greatly discounted the future than non-smokers and, in longitudinal studies, higher discounting predicted future smoking. Smokers with lower time-discount rates achieved higher quit rates. Findings were consistent across studies measuring discount rates using hypothetical monetary or cigarette reward scenarios. The methodological quality of the majority of studies was rated as 'moderate' and co-citation analysis revealed an isolation of economics journals and a dearth of studies in public health.
Conclusion: There is moderate yet consistent evidence that high time-discounting is a risk factor for smoking and unsuccessful cessation. Policy scenarios assuming a flat rate of population discounting may inadequately capture smokers' perceptions of costs and benefits.

Keywords

References

  1. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;15(2):187-94 [PMID: 17469942]
  2. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Dec;231(23):4517-26 [PMID: 24819731]
  3. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Oct;10(10):1571-5 [PMID: 18946776]
  4. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Aug 1;103(3):99-106 [PMID: 19443136]
  5. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Sep;69(9):886-92 [PMID: 25841241]
  6. Addict Behav. 2003 Aug;28(6):1167-73 [PMID: 12834659]
  7. Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):99-112 [PMID: 19675322]
  8. Health Econ. 2014 Dec;23(12):1443-64 [PMID: 24136867]
  9. Behav Pharmacol. 2010 Dec;21(8):754-64 [PMID: 20944502]
  10. Ulster Med J. 2009 Sep;78(3):142-5 [PMID: 19907678]
  11. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Oct;6(5):819-28 [PMID: 15700917]
  12. J Risk Uncertain. 2008 Dec 1;37(2-3):237-269 [PMID: 19412359]
  13. Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Mar;17(2):133-42 [PMID: 16495721]
  14. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Aug;35(8):3774-87 [PMID: 24523255]
  15. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 May;17(5):503-9 [PMID: 25335950]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Nov;96(3):363-85 [PMID: 22084496]
  17. Behav Processes. 2013 Oct;99:100-5 [PMID: 23872502]
  18. Addict Behav. 2015 Jun;45:124-33 [PMID: 25661991]
  19. Prev Med. 2014 Nov;68:37-43 [PMID: 25008219]
  20. Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):966-76 [PMID: 25784347]
  21. Addict Behav. 2012 Jan;37(1):67-72 [PMID: 21963152]
  22. Addiction. 2009 Jun;104(6):1025-6 [PMID: 19466927]
  23. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Aug 1;96(3):256-62 [PMID: 18468814]
  24. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Dec 1;91(2-3):293-6 [PMID: 17720334]
  25. Addict Behav. 2014 Jun;39(6):1087-93 [PMID: 24661901]
  26. J Health Econ. 2010 Sep;29(5):708-17 [PMID: 20727602]
  27. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(3):241-8 [PMID: 24175489]
  28. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Oct 8;90(2-3):301-3 [PMID: 17543476]
  29. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):409-418 [PMID: 26051750]
  30. Arch Iran Med. 2010 Sep;13(5):395-405 [PMID: 20804306]
  31. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Feb;22(1):57-64 [PMID: 24417209]
  32. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;15(2):176-86 [PMID: 17469941]
  33. Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Feb 1;69(3):260-5 [PMID: 20965498]
  34. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Apr;23(2):97-108 [PMID: 25730417]
  35. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Oct;22(5):384-91 [PMID: 25069014]
  36. Behav Processes. 2004 Jan 30;65(1):35-42 [PMID: 14744545]
  37. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Oct 1;104 Suppl 1:S87-93 [PMID: 19446407]
  38. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Apr 17;88(1):79-82 [PMID: 17049754]
  39. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002 Aug;4(3):295-303 [PMID: 12215238]
  40. Addict Behav. 2004 Aug;29(6):1171-5 [PMID: 15236819]
  41. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar 12;8:76 [PMID: 24659960]
  42. Behav Pharmacol. 2011 Jun;22(3):266-8 [PMID: 21430520]
  43. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Nov;182(4):508-15 [PMID: 16167142]
  44. Addiction. 2009 Jun;104(6):1018-24 [PMID: 19466926]
  45. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Aug;216(3):305-21 [PMID: 21373791]
  46. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Aug;17(4):258-65 [PMID: 19653791]
  47. Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24(4):551-6 [PMID: 24891458]
  48. Scientometrics. 2010 Aug;84(2):523-538 [PMID: 20585380]
  49. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(4):447-54 [PMID: 10550495]
  50. Lancet. 2013 May 4;381(9877):1588-95 [PMID: 23642700]
  51. Behav Genet. 2011 Mar;41(2):175-83 [PMID: 20700643]
  52. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Aug;19(4):263-74 [PMID: 21707190]
  53. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(10):1992-2007 [PMID: 23509964]
  54. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64 [PMID: 19622511]
  55. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan;219(2):549-62 [PMID: 21983917]
  56. Health Econ Rev. 2014 Jun 17;4:5 [PMID: 25006542]
  57. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 May;168(5):540-9 [PMID: 21362742]
  58. Child Dev. 1994 Apr;65(2 Spec No):296-318 [PMID: 7516849]
  59. Addiction. 2012 May;107(5):1003-12 [PMID: 22126134]
  60. Behav Processes. 2004 Nov 30;67(3):545-9 [PMID: 15519004]
  61. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 04;9(12):e112440 [PMID: 25474540]
  62. Addict Behav. 2012 Jul;37(7):871-4 [PMID: 22445419]
  63. Obes Rev. 2016 Sep;17 (9):810-9 [PMID: 27256685]
  64. Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;45(1):251-60 [PMID: 26888870]
  65. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Nov;224(1):109-20 [PMID: 22644127]
  66. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):1-9 [PMID: 25641079]
  67. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(3):176-84 [PMID: 17163895]
  68. Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jun;134(3):287-97 [PMID: 22387232]
  69. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jan 1;99(1-3):350-3 [PMID: 18818028]
  70. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Aug;112(3):382-92 [PMID: 12943017]
  71. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):235-43 [PMID: 11599641]
  72. Addiction. 2012 Feb;107(2):417-24 [PMID: 21906199]
  73. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Feb 1;135:152-5 [PMID: 24360649]
  74. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Oct;17(5):302-11 [PMID: 19803629]
  75. J Health Care Mark. 1990 Mar;10(1):36-46 [PMID: 10104012]
  76. Prev Sci. 2010 Sep;11(3):319-30 [PMID: 20306298]
  77. BMC Public Health. 2012 May 18;12:303 [PMID: 22537139]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Delay Discounting
Health Policy
Humans
Risk Factors
Smoking
Smoking Cessation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studiessmokingtime-discountinghealthacrosscessationdiscountrateseconomicsrewardrelationshiptobaccoreviewmeasuresqualityfuturehigherdiscountingconsistentscenariosanalysisBackground:Tobaccoharmspeoplesmokefailquit?explanationoriginatingbehaviouralsuggestsroledescribesvaluebetterdecreasesdelayreceiptlargenumbertestoutcomestemporalpatternvariationaccordingmeasurementmethodsremainunclearassociationlifecourseinitiationiidiverseMethods:identified69relevantWebSciencePubMedsynthesizedfindingsmethodologiesevaluatedstudycross-disciplinaryfertilizationResults:4454smokersgreatlydiscountednon-smokerslongitudinalpredictedSmokerslowertime-discountachievedquitFindingsmeasuringusinghypotheticalmonetarycigarettemethodologicalmajorityrated'moderate'co-citationrevealedisolationjournalsdearthpublicConclusion:moderateyetevidencehighriskfactorunsuccessfulPolicyassumingflatratepopulationmayinadequatelycapturesmokers'perceptionscostsbenefitsTime-discountingsmoking:systematicnetworktimepreference

Similar Articles

Cited By