Snakebite Envenoming - A Combined Density Equalizing Mapping and Scientometric Analysis of the Publication History.

David A Groneberg, Victoria Geier, Doris Klingelhöfer, Alexander Gerber, Ulrich Kuch, Beatrix Kloft
Author Information
  1. David A Groneberg: Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.
  2. Victoria Geier: Institute of Occupational Medicine, Charité-School of Medicine, Germany.
  3. Doris Klingelhöfer: Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.
  4. Alexander Gerber: Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.
  5. Ulrich Kuch: Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.
  6. Beatrix Kloft: Health Economics and Metrics, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.

Abstract

Estimates suggest that more than 25,000 to 125,000 people die annually from snakebite envenomation worldwide. In contrast to this major disease burden, thorough bibliometric studies do not exist so far that illustrate the overall research activity over a long time span. Therefore, the NewQIS-platform conducted an analysis on snakebite envenoming using the Thomson Reuters database Web of Science. To determine and assess changes regarding the scientific activities and to specifically address the more recent situation we analyzed two time intervals (t). During the first time interval from 1900 to 2007 (t1) 13,015 publications (p) were identified. In the following period (2008-2016 = t2) 4,982 publications were identified by the same search strategy. They originate from 114 (t1) respectively 121 countries (t2), with the USA (p = 3518), Brazil (p = 1100) and Japan (p = 961) being most productive in the first period, and the USA (p = 1087), Brazil (p = 991) and China (p = 378) in the second period, respectively. Setting the publication numbers in relation to GDP/capita, Brazil leads with 92 publications per 10,000 Int$GDP/capita, followed by India with 79 publications per 10000 Int$GDP/capita (t1). Comparing the country's publication activity with the Human Development Index level indicates that the majority of the publications is published by highly developed countries. When calculating the average citation rates (citations per published item = CR) mainly European countries show the highest ranks: From 1900-2007 Sweden ranks first with a CR = 27, followed by the Netherlands (CR = 24.8), Switzerland (CR = 23), Spain, Austria and the USA (CR = 22). From 2008 to 2016 the highest rate achieves Switzerland with a value of 24.6, followed by Belgium (CR = 18.1), Spain (CR = 16.7), Costa Rica (CR = 14.9) and Netherlands (CR = 14). Compared with this, the USA was placed at rank 13 (CR = 9,5). In summary, the present study represents the first density-equalizing map projection and in-depth scientometric analysis of the global research output on snakebites and its venoms. So it draws a sketch of the worldwide publication architecture and indicates that countries with a high incidence of snakebites and a low economical level still need to be empowered in carrying out research in this area.

References

  1. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Aug;5(8):e1255 [PMID: 21829741]
  2. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Dec 05;7(12):e2568 [PMID: 24340113]
  3. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Jan 26;4(1):e603 [PMID: 20126271]
  4. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(9):e1841 [PMID: 23029595]
  5. Ther Drug Monit. 2000 Feb;22(1):65-8 [PMID: 10688262]
  6. J Med Biogr. 2007 Aug;15(3):139-46 [PMID: 17641786]
  7. Lancet. 2010 Jan 2;375(9708):77-88 [PMID: 20109866]
  8. BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Sep 30;13:454 [PMID: 24079616]
  9. Toxicon. 1994 Nov;32(11):1295-304 [PMID: 7886689]
  10. Int Microbiol. 2007 Mar;10(1):65-9 [PMID: 17407063]
  11. BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 05;13:541 [PMID: 23734726]
  12. J Viral Hepat. 2014 Nov;21(11):786-93 [PMID: 24205854]
  13. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Oct 26;4(10):e860 [PMID: 21049056]
  14. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):2 [PMID: 24438527]
  15. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Jul 25;7(7):e2326 [PMID: 23936562]
  16. Med J Aust. 2008 Apr 21;188(8):473-6 [PMID: 18429716]
  17. Toxicon. 1999 Sep;37(9):1241-58 [PMID: 10400286]
  18. Int J Health Geogr. 2008 Aug 25;7:48 [PMID: 18724868]
  19. Toxicon. 2013 Jul;69:3-13 [PMID: 23200816]
  20. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 May 02;7(5):e2206 [PMID: 23658852]
  21. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2009 Jun 26;4:16 [PMID: 19555514]
  22. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1759 [PMID: 22860149]
  23. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Mar-Apr;89(2):178-82 [PMID: 7778143]
  24. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Nov 07;7(11):e2445 [PMID: 24244761]
  25. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2013 Feb;106(1):81-2 [PMID: 23299950]
  26. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Jun 29;4(6):e727 [PMID: 20614020]
  27. Biol Aujourdhui. 2010;204(1):87-91 [PMID: 20950580]
  28. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Dec 22;3(12):e569 [PMID: 20027216]
  29. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(5):515-24 [PMID: 9868843]
  30. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(3):e1554 [PMID: 22428077]
  31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 18;101(20):7499-504 [PMID: 15136719]
  32. Natl Med J India. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):321-4 [PMID: 22680254]
  33. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(1):e2009 [PMID: 23383352]
  34. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Sep 12;7(9):e2442 [PMID: 24069493]
  35. Acta Trop. 1976;33(4):307-41 [PMID: 14490]
  36. Lancet. 2010 Jan 2;375(9708):89-91 [PMID: 20109867]
  37. Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;3:54 [PMID: 24886533]
  38. Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):56-63 [PMID: 5634379]
  39. Lancet. 2001 Apr 7;357(9262):1132 [PMID: 11303611]
  40. EMBO Rep. 2009 Aug;10(8):800-3 [PMID: 19648952]
  41. PLoS Med. 2006 Jun;3(6):e150 [PMID: 16729843]
  42. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Apr 12;5(4):e1018 [PMID: 21532748]
  43. PLoS Med. 2008 Nov 4;5(11):e218 [PMID: 18986210]
  44. Lancet. 1999 May 8;353(9164):1592 [PMID: 10334267]
  45. J Proteomics. 2009 Mar 6;72(2):165-82 [PMID: 19344652]
  46. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1670 [PMID: 22679521]
  47. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Sep 25;9(9):e0004083 [PMID: 26406894]
  48. Rheumatol Int. 2013 Nov;33(11):2743-50 [PMID: 23797780]
  49. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1740 [PMID: 22816003]
  50. Int J Health Geogr. 2011 Oct 14;10:55 [PMID: 21999813]
  51. Parasit Vectors. 2013 Nov 18;6:331 [PMID: 24245856]

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Animals
Bibliometrics
Biomedical Research
Brazil
China
Databases, Factual
Global Health
Humans
Public Health
Snake Bites
Snake Venoms
Snakes
Socioeconomic Factors
United States

Chemicals

Snake Venoms

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0=CRppublicationsfirstcountriesUSA000researchtimet1periodBrazilpublicationperfollowedsnakebiteworldwideactivityanalysis13identifiedt2respectivelyInt$GDP/capitalevelindicatespublishedhighestNetherlands24SwitzerlandSpain149snakebitesEstimatessuggest25125peopledieannuallyenvenomationcontrastmajordiseaseburdenthoroughbibliometricstudiesexistfarillustrateoveralllongspanThereforeNewQIS-platformconductedenvenomingusingThomsonReutersdatabaseWebSciencedetermineassesschangesregardingscientificactivitiesspecificallyaddressrecentsituationanalyzedtwointervalstinterval19002007015following2008-20164982searchstrategyoriginate11412135181100Japan961productive1087991China378secondSettingnumbersrelationGDP/capitaleads9210India7910000Comparingcountry'sHumanDevelopmentIndexmajorityhighlydevelopedcalculatingaveragecitationratescitationsitemmainlyEuropeanshowranks:1900-2007Swedenranks27823Austria2220082016rateachievesvalue6Belgium181167CostaRicaComparedplacedrank5summarypresentstudyrepresentsdensity-equalizingmapprojectionin-depthscientometricglobaloutputvenomsdrawssketcharchitecturehighincidenceloweconomicalstillneedempoweredcarryingareaSnakebiteEnvenoming-CombinedDensityEqualizingMappingScientometricAnalysisPublicationHistory

Similar Articles

Cited By