Cognitive remediation for adults with schizophrenia: Does age matter?

Silvia Corbera, Bruce E Wexler, Ania Poltorak, Warren R Thime, Matthew M Kurtz
Author Information
  1. Silvia Corbera: Schizophrenia Rehabilitation Program, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT, USA.
  2. Bruce E Wexler: Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  3. Ania Poltorak: Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT, USA; University of Saint Joseph,West Hartford, CT, USA.
  4. Warren R Thime: Schizophrenia Rehabilitation Program, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT, USA.
  5. Matthew M Kurtz: Schizophrenia Rehabilitation Program, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT, USA; Department of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience and Behavior, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: mkurtz@wesleyan.edu.

Abstract

Cognitive remediation (CR), a novel behavioral intervention designed to improve cognitive deficits through repeated task practice and/or strategy acquisition has gained increasing empirical support in people with schizophrenia, but substantial individual differences in treatment response remain (Wykes et al., 2011). The role of age on response to CR in schizophrenia remains understudied. We evaluated the role of three age ranges in treatment response to CR relative to a closely-matched computer skills control intervention in a blinded, randomized control trial (RCT) with 112 adults with schizophrenia divided into three groups: an early-stage group (ES; 25 years or younger, mean=3.4 years of illness; n=45), an early-chronic group (EC; 26-39, mean=7.6 years of illness; n=31) and a late-chronic group (LC; 40 and over, mean=18.2 years of illness; n=36). With respect to cognitive outcomes, early-stage and early-chronic individuals with schizophrenia showed greater improvement in response to CR on a working memory measure at a trend level, relative to late-chronic clients. These findings were confirmed in analyses of a subsample of clients who received an adequate dose of treatment. These findings emphasize the need for adaptations of currently-existing CR programs to more effectively address the needs of older client populations.

Keywords

References

  1. Schizophr Bull. 2005 Oct;31(4):942-53 [PMID: 16120830]
  2. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;58(2):148-57 [PMID: 11177116]
  3. Schizophr Bull. 2007 Nov;33(6):1364-72 [PMID: 17341468]
  4. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;58(1):24-32 [PMID: 11146755]
  5. Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jul;36(4):869-79 [PMID: 19269924]
  6. Schizophr Res. 2015 Mar;162(1-3):108-11 [PMID: 25631454]
  7. Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;171(3):369 [PMID: 24585331]
  8. Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 1;173(6):607-16 [PMID: 26917166]
  9. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Mar 1;63(5):505-11 [PMID: 17662256]
  10. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 May;168(5):472-85 [PMID: 21406461]
  11. Schizophr Bull. 2014 Nov;40(6):1472-81 [PMID: 24682210]
  12. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;166(7):805-11 [PMID: 19448187]
  13. Schizophr Bull. 2014 Jul;40(4):744-55 [PMID: 23770934]
  14. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 Nov-Dec;42(6):829-38 [PMID: 16680620]
  15. Schizophr Res. 2009 Feb;107(2-3):267-74 [PMID: 19006657]
  16. Psychiatry Res. 1994 Jun;52(3):295-303 [PMID: 7991723]
  17. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;8(1):32-8 [PMID: 23343011]
  18. Schizophr Res. 2009 Sep;113(2-3):252-8 [PMID: 19524409]
  19. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;21(3):218-30 [PMID: 23395189]
  20. Schizophr Bull. 2000;26(1):119-36 [PMID: 10755673]
  21. Neuropsychology. 2009 May;23(3):315-36 [PMID: 19413446]
  22. Schizophr Res. 2015 Mar;162(1-3):35-41 [PMID: 25640526]
  23. Schizophr Bull. 2015 Jan;41(1):250-8 [PMID: 24444862]
  24. Schizophr Bull. 2001;27(2):235-45 [PMID: 11354591]
  25. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76 [PMID: 3616518]
  26. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Sep;37 Suppl 2:S55-62 [PMID: 21860048]
  27. BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1123-4 [PMID: 11701584]
  28. Psychiatr Serv. 2005 May;56(5):602-4 [PMID: 15872171]
  29. Schizophr Res. 2014 Aug;157(1-3):314-6 [PMID: 24954429]
  30. Conn Med. 1997 Sep;61(9):597-608 [PMID: 9334515]
  31. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005 Sep;193(9):602-8 [PMID: 16131943]
  32. Schizophr Res. 2007 Jan;89(1-3):251-60 [PMID: 17070671]
  33. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Sep;37 Suppl 2:S80-90 [PMID: 21860051]
  34. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Nov;37(6):1318-26 [PMID: 20547571]
  35. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;164(12):1791-802 [PMID: 18056233]
  36. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;58(8):763-8 [PMID: 11483142]
  37. Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Nov;60(11):1468-76 [PMID: 19880464]
  38. Schizophr Res. 2005 Apr 1;74(1):15-26 [PMID: 15694750]
  39. Schizophr Res. 2007 Aug;94(1-3):221-30 [PMID: 17524620]

Grants

  1. K08 MH069888/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Factors
Cognition Disorders
Cognitive Remediation
Female
Humans
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Schizophrenia
Schizophrenic Psychology
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CRschizophreniaresponseyearsCognitiveremediationtreatmentagegroupillnessinterventioncognitiverolethreerelativecontroladultsearly-stageearly-chroniclate-chronicmemoryclientsfindingsnovelbehavioraldesignedimprovedeficitsrepeatedtaskpracticeand/orstrategyacquisitiongainedincreasingempiricalsupportpeoplesubstantialindividualdifferencesremainWykesetal2011remainsunderstudiedevaluatedrangesclosely-matchedcomputerskillsblindedrandomizedtrialRCT112dividedgroups:ES25youngermean=34n=45EC26-39mean=76n=31LC40mean=182n=36respectoutcomesindividualsshowedgreaterimprovementworkingmeasuretrendlevelconfirmedanalysessubsamplereceivedadequatedoseemphasizeneedadaptationscurrently-existingprogramseffectivelyaddressneedsolderclientpopulationsschizophrenia:matter?AgeEarlypsychosisSchizophreniaWorking

Similar Articles

Cited By