An Evaluation of Positional Prompts for Teaching Receptive Identification to Individuals Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Justin B Leaf, Joseph H Cihon, Donna Townley-Cochran, Kevin Miller, Ronald Leaf, John McEachin, Mitchell Taubman
Author Information
  1. Justin B Leaf: Autism Partnership Foundation, 200 Marina Drive, Seal Beach, CA 90740 USA.
  2. Joseph H Cihon: Autism Partnership Foundation, 200 Marina Drive, Seal Beach, CA 90740 USA.
  3. Donna Townley-Cochran: Autism Partnership Foundation, 200 Marina Drive, Seal Beach, CA 90740 USA.
  4. Kevin Miller: Autism Partnership Foundation, 200 Marina Drive, Seal Beach, CA 90740 USA.
  5. Ronald Leaf: Autism Partnership Foundation, 200 Marina Drive, Seal Beach, CA 90740 USA.
  6. John McEachin: Autism Partnership Foundation, 200 Marina Drive, Seal Beach, CA 90740 USA.
  7. Mitchell Taubman: Autism Partnership Foundation, 200 Marina Drive, Seal Beach, CA 90740 USA.

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the effects of positional prompts on teaching receptive identification to six children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The researchers implemented a most-to-least prompting system using a three level hierarchy to teach receptive picture identification. Within the prompting hierarchy, only positional prompts were used. The most assistive prompt was placing the target stimulus 12 in. closer to the participant, the less assistive prompt was placing the target stimulus 6 in. closer to the participant, and no prompt was placing the target stimulus in line with the alternative stimuli. A non-concurrent multiple baseline design across behaviors was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the positional prompt. Results indicated that the implementation of positional prompts resulted in participants reaching mastery criterion and maintaining skills at follow-up for the majority of the participants. The results of the study have both future clinical and research implications.

Keywords

References

  1. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(1):59-71 [PMID: 1270699]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jan;57(1):109-17 [PMID: 1548446]
  3. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Feb;46(2):720-31 [PMID: 26373767]
  4. J Autism Dev Disord. 1979 Dec;9(4):361-82 [PMID: 521430]
  5. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1981 Sep;12(3):257-9 [PMID: 7320215]
  6. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8 [PMID: 1634435]
  7. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Feb;38(2):261-75 [PMID: 17546491]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):347-54 [PMID: 4252714]
  9. Behav Anal Pract. 2008 Spring;1(1):37-43 [PMID: 22477678]
  10. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Summer;31(2):191-202 [PMID: 9652099]
  11. Behav Anal Pract. 2013 Spring;6(1):56-75 [PMID: 25729507]
  12. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Summer;43(2):215-28 [PMID: 21119896]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0positionalpromptspromptstimuluspromptingplacingtargetstudyreceptiveidentificationhierarchyusedassistivecloserparticipantparticipantsPositionalPromptsAutismevaluatedeffectsteachingsixchildrendiagnosedautismspectrumdisorderASDresearchersimplementedmost-to-leastsystemusingthreelevelteachpictureWithin12 inless6 inlinealternativestimulinon-concurrentmultiplebaselinedesignacrossbehaviorsevaluateeffectivenessResultsindicatedimplementationresultedreachingmasterycriterionmaintainingskillsfollow-upmajorityresultsfutureclinicalresearchimplicationsEvaluationTeachingReceptiveIdentificationIndividualsDiagnosedSpectrumDisorderMost-to-leastTransfercontrol

Similar Articles

Cited By