Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater.

André Strauss, Penelope Heather Dobrowsky, Thando Ndlovu, Brandon Reyneke, Wesaal Khan
Author Information
  1. André Strauss: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.
  2. Penelope Heather Dobrowsky: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.
  3. Thando Ndlovu: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.
  4. Brandon Reyneke: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.
  5. Wesaal Khan: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa. wesaal@sun.ac.za.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous pathogens and opportunistic pathogens have been detected in harvested rainwater. Developing countries, in particular, require time- and cost-effective treatment strategies to improve the quality of this water source. The primary aim of the current study was thus to compare solar pasteurization (SOPAS; 70 to 79 °C; 80 to 89 °C; and ≥90 °C) to solar disinfection (SODIS; 6 and 8 hrs) for their efficiency in reducing the level of microbial contamination in harvested rainwater. The chemical quality (anions and cations) of the SOPAS and SODIS treated and untreated rainwater samples were also monitored.
RESULTS: While the anion concentrations in all the samples were within drinking water guidelines, the concentrations of lead (Pb) and nickel (Ni) exceeded the guidelines in all the SOPAS samples. Additionally, the iron (Fe) concentrations in both the SODIS 6 and 8 hr samples were above the drinking water guidelines. A >99% reduction in Escherichia coli and heterotrophic bacteria counts was then obtained in the SOPAS and SODIS samples. Ethidium monoazide bromide quantitative polymerase chain reaction (EMA-qPCR) analysis revealed a 94.70% reduction in viable Legionella copy numbers in the SOPAS samples, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 50.60% and 75.22% decrease, respectively. Similarly, a 99.61% reduction in viable Pseudomonas copy numbers was observed after SOPAS treatment, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 47.27% and 58.31% decrease, respectively.
CONCLUSION: While both the SOPAS and SODIS systems reduced the indicator counts to below the detection limit, EMA-qPCR analysis indicated that SOPAS treatment yielded a 2- and 3-log reduction in viable Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively. Additionally, SODIS after 8 hrs yielded a 2-log and 1-log reduction in Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively and could be considered as an alternative, cost-effective treatment method for harvested rainwater.

Keywords

References

  1. Water Res. 2015 Mar 15;71:244-56 [PMID: 25622002]
  2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(22):7382-91 [PMID: 20851954]
  3. J Hazard Mater. 2012 Oct 15;235-236:29-46 [PMID: 22906844]
  4. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009;201:71-115 [PMID: 19484589]
  5. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):3163-70 [PMID: 15933017]
  6. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Feb;49(2):229-33 [PMID: 11815561]
  7. Food Microbiol. 2011 Aug;28(5):848-61 [PMID: 21569926]
  8. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Jul;15(3):506-26 [PMID: 12097254]
  9. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011 Nov;214(6):485-92 [PMID: 21742552]
  10. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012 Aug;333(1):77-84 [PMID: 22639954]
  11. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Apr;80(7):2307-16 [PMID: 24487540]
  12. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006 Sep;24(3):356-62 [PMID: 17366777]
  13. Water Res. 2009 May;43(8):2209-23 [PMID: 19339033]
  14. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Apr;72(4):2586-93 [PMID: 16597961]
  15. Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Feb;188(2):73 [PMID: 26733467]
  16. Microbes Infect. 2000 Jul;2(9):1051-60 [PMID: 10967285]
  17. Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Aug;120(8):a305 [PMID: 22854171]
  18. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Oct;41(10):4815-6 [PMID: 14532229]
  19. J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Jan;116(1):199-207 [PMID: 24024984]
  20. Water Res. 2009 Dec;43(20):5225-35 [PMID: 19783275]
  21. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Aug;109(2):623-34 [PMID: 20163500]
  22. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Feb;65(2):859-61 [PMID: 9925631]
  23. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006 Dec;58(3):583-92 [PMID: 17117999]
  24. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1330-4 [PMID: 7103487]
  25. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jun;75(11):3502-12 [PMID: 19363080]
  26. Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 1;536:206-14 [PMID: 26218559]
  27. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul;34(4):415-25 [PMID: 20059548]
  28. Water Res. 2006 Mar;40(6):1326-32 [PMID: 16524613]
  29. J Microbiol Methods. 2012 Nov;91(2):276-89 [PMID: 22940102]
  30. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1997 Apr;24(4):276-80 [PMID: 9134775]
  31. Res Microbiol. 2014 Oct;165(8):647-56 [PMID: 25102022]
  32. Water Res. 2006 Jul;40(13):2463-76 [PMID: 16808958]
  33. Sci Total Environ. 2016 May 15;553:662-70 [PMID: 26990076]
  34. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 03;9(3):e90743 [PMID: 24595188]
  35. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2000 Mar;45(3):310-6 [PMID: 10702352]

MeSH Term

Bacterial Load
Developing Countries
Disinfection
Drinking Water
Environmental Monitoring
Escherichia coli
Pasteurization
Rain
Sunlight
Water Microbiology
Water Purification

Chemicals

Drinking Water

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SOPASSODISsamplesrainwatertreatmentreductionharvestedsolar68 hrsLegionellacopynumbersyieldedrespectivelyPseudomonaswaterconcentrationsguidelinesEMA-qPCRanalysisviablepathogenscost-effectivequalitypasteurizationdisinfectiondrinkingAdditionallycountsdecreasesppSolarBACKGROUND:NumerousopportunisticdetectedDevelopingcountriesparticularrequiretime-strategiesimprovesourceprimaryaimcurrentstudythuscompare7079 °C8089 °C≥90 °CefficiencyreducinglevelmicrobialcontaminationchemicalanionscationstreateduntreatedalsomonitoredRESULTS:anionwithinleadPbnickelNiexceededironFe8 hr>99%EscherichiacoliheterotrophicbacteriaobtainedEthidiummonoazidebromidequantitativepolymerasechainreactionrevealed9470%5060%7522%Similarly9961%observed4727%5831%CONCLUSION:systemsreducedindicatordetectionlimitindicated2-3-log2-log1-logconsideredalternativemethodComparativeversusMicrobialIndicatorsDisinfectionPasteurization

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)