Pathways From Socioeconomic Status to Prenatal Smoking: A Test of the Reserve Capacity Model.

Irene Yang, Lynne A Hall, Kristin Ashford, Sudeshna Paul, Barbara Polivka, S Lee Ridner
Author Information
  1. Irene Yang: Irene Yang, PhD, RN, is Postdoctoral Fellow, Emory University School of Nursing, Atlanta, Georgia. Lynne A. Hall, DrPH, RN, is Professor and Associate Dean for Research, University of Louisville School of Nursing, Kentucky. Kristin Ashford, PhD, APRN, is Associate Professor, University of Kentucky College of Nursing, Lexington. Sudeshna Paul, PhD, is Assistant Research Professor, Emory University School of Nursing, Atlanta, Georgia. Barbara Polivka, PhD, RN, is Professor and Shirley B. Powers Chair in Nursing, University of Louisville School of Nursing, Kentucky. S. Lee Ridner, PhD, FNP-BC, is Associate Dean for Graduate Programs, University of Louisville School of Nursing, Kentucky.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-income, unemployed women with low levels of education are more likely to smoke during pregnancy compared to their higher-income, employed, and well-educated counterparts. The reserve capacity model (RCM) offers a theoretical framework to explain how psychosocial factors may serve as pathways connecting socioeconomic status (SES) to health behaviors. Research supports the link between prenatal smoking and several psychosocial variables such as chronic stressors, depressive symptoms, and social support. How these variables interrelate to explain the predominance of prenatal smoking in lower socioeconomic groups of pregnant women has not been fully elucidated.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the RCM to evaluate the roles of early pregnancy levels of chronic stress, quality of the primary intimate relationship, and depressive symptoms in explaining the relationship between SES and persistent prenatal smoking.
METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from 370 pregnant nonsmokers, spontaneous quitters, and persistent prenatal smokers was conducted. On the basis of the RCM, chronic stressors, depressive symptoms, and the quality of the primary intimate relationship were evaluated as potential mediating variables linking SES with persistent prenatal smoking using path analysis.
RESULTS: Path analyses indicated that a simple model with all three psychosocial variables as mediators of the relationship between SES and persistent prenatal smoking provided the best fit.
DISCUSSION: Findings indicated that chronic stressors, depressive symptoms, and the quality of the primary intimate relationship play important roles in the pathway from SES to prenatal smoking status. This knowledge can assist in the development of prevention and intervention strategies to target these variables and ultimately reduce prenatal smoking.

References

  1. Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):310-57 [PMID: 3901065]
  2. Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;129(1):10-51 [PMID: 12555793]
  3. Health Educ Behav. 2007 Oct;34(5):748-64 [PMID: 17200098]
  4. Addict Behav. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):405-13 [PMID: 11436932]
  5. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(11):2013-20 [PMID: 22910191]
  6. Matern Child Health J. 2009 May;13(3):395-406 [PMID: 18496746]
  7. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2002 Mar;21(1):17-25 [PMID: 12189000]
  8. Stat Med. 2003 Oct 15;22(19):3073-88 [PMID: 12973788]
  9. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2008 Feb;27(2):150-173 [PMID: 19079772]
  10. Addict Behav. 2009 Aug;34(8):705-8 [PMID: 19411145]
  11. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;30(4):238-43 [PMID: 19845492]
  12. Am J Public Health. 1985 May;75(5):518-22 [PMID: 3985241]
  13. J Psychosom Res. 2011 Apr;70(4):385-9 [PMID: 21414460]
  14. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):320-5 [PMID: 14501634]
  15. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Oct 1;104 Suppl 1:S100-5 [PMID: 19442460]
  16. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6 [PMID: 3651732]
  17. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009 May 29;58(4):1-29 [PMID: 19478726]
  18. Addict Behav. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):649-58 [PMID: 12188598]
  19. Addict Behav. 2007 Jul;32(7):1347-66 [PMID: 17097815]
  20. J Perinat Educ. 2005 Spring;14(2):19-25 [PMID: 17273429]
  21. Nurs Res. 1996 Jul-Aug;45(4):231-8 [PMID: 8700657]
  22. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD001055 [PMID: 19588322]
  23. Health Promot Int. 2001 Dec;16(4):355-65 [PMID: 11733454]
  24. J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan-Feb;153(1):62-79 [PMID: 23421006]
  25. Nurs Res. 1991 Jul-Aug;40(4):214-20 [PMID: 1857646]
  26. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Jun;13(2):138-47 [PMID: 18465475]
  27. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Nov 8;62(6):1-19 [PMID: 24196750]
  28. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;33(3):306-11 [PMID: 15180193]
  29. J Behav Med. 2015 Feb;38(1):110-21 [PMID: 25022863]
  30. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(4):337-44 [PMID: 15636414]
  31. Health Psychol. 2008 Sep;27(5):576-83 [PMID: 18823184]

Grants

  1. P30 GM110788/NIGMS NIH HHS
  2. T32 NR012715/NINR NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Attitude to Health
Female
Humans
Maternal Behavior
Models, Psychological
Mothers
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
Prenatal Care
Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects
Risk Factors
Smoking
Smoking Prevention
Socioeconomic Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0prenatalsmokingSESvariablesrelationshipchronicdepressivesymptomspersistentRCMpsychosocialstressorsqualityprimaryintimatewomenlevelspregnancymodelexplainsocioeconomicstatuspregnantrolesanalysisindicatedBACKGROUND:Low-incomeunemployedloweducationlikelysmokecomparedhigher-incomeemployedwell-educatedcounterpartsreservecapacityofferstheoreticalframeworkfactorsmayservepathwaysconnectinghealthbehaviorsResearchsupportslinkseveralsocialsupportinterrelatepredominancelowergroupsfullyelucidatedOBJECTIVE:aimstudytestevaluateearlystressexplainingMETHODS:secondarydata370nonsmokersspontaneousquitterssmokersconductedbasisevaluatedpotentialmediatinglinkingusingpathRESULTS:PathanalysessimplethreemediatorsprovidedbestfitDISCUSSION:FindingsplayimportantpathwayknowledgecanassistdevelopmentpreventioninterventionstrategiestargetultimatelyreducePathwaysSocioeconomicStatusPrenatalSmoking:TestReserveCapacityModel

Similar Articles

Cited By