Effect of shorter pulse duration in cochlear neural activation with an 810-nm near-infrared laser.

Jingxuan Wang, Lan Tian, Jianren Lu, Ming Xia, Ying Wei
Author Information
  1. Jingxuan Wang: Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621900, China.
  2. Lan Tian: School of Microelectronics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China. sdutld@yeah.net.
  3. Jianren Lu: School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China.
  4. Ming Xia: Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China.
  5. Ying Wei: School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China.

Abstract

Optical neural stimulation in the cochlea has been presented as an alternative technique to the electrical stimulation due to its potential in spatially selectivity enhancement. So far, few studies have selected the near-infrared (NIR) laser in cochlear neural stimulation and limited optical parameter space has been examined. This paper focused on investigating the optical parameter effect on NIR stimulation of auditory neurons, especially under shorter pulse durations. The spiral ganglion neurons in the cochlea of deafened guinea pigs were stimulated with a pulsed 810-nm NIR laser in vivo. The laser radiation was delivered by an optical fiber and irradiated towards the modiolus. Optically evoked auditory brainstem responses (OABRs) with various optical parameters were recorded and investigated. The OABRs could be elicited with the cochlear deafened animals by using the 810-nm laser in a wide pulse duration ranged from 20 to 1000 μs. Results showed that the OABR intensity increased along with the increasing laser radiant exposure of limited range at each specific pulse duration. In addition, for the pulse durations from 20 to 300 μs, the OABR intensity increased monotonically along with the pulse duration broadening. While for pulse durations above 300 μs, the OABR intensity basically kept stable with the increasing pulse duration. The 810-nm NIR laser could be an effective stimulus in evoking the cochlear neuron response. Our experimental data provided evidence to optimize the pulse duration range, and the results suggested that the pulse durations from 20 to 300 μs could be the optimized range in cochlear neural activation with the 810-nm-wavelength laser.

Keywords

References

  1. Opt Express. 2009 Dec 7;17(25):23037-43 [PMID: 20052230]
  2. Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:4-13 [PMID: 25159273]
  3. Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Mar 14;14:23 [PMID: 25889277]
  4. Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:181-90 [PMID: 23994125]
  5. Sci Rep. 2014 Aug 04;4:5941 [PMID: 25087606]
  6. Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Sep;38(8):745-53 [PMID: 16871623]
  7. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Jun;54(6 Pt 1):1108-14 [PMID: 17554829]
  8. Laryngoscope. 2010 Oct;120(10):2071-82 [PMID: 20830761]
  9. J Biomed Opt. 2015 Aug;20(8):88004 [PMID: 26295178]
  10. Biophys J. 2008 Apr 15;94(8):3159-66 [PMID: 18192375]
  11. Laser Photon Rev. 2011 Jan 1;5(1):68-80 [PMID: 23082105]
  12. Lasers Surg Med. 2013 Sep;45(7):469-81 [PMID: 23832680]
  13. J Neural Eng. 2010 Aug;7(4):040201 [PMID: 20644243]
  14. Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Oct 07;14:89 [PMID: 26445884]
  15. Neurophotonics. 2015 Apr;2(2):025002 [PMID: 26158006]
  16. J Biomed Opt. 2009 Nov-Dec;14(6):060501 [PMID: 20059232]
  17. J Endourol. 2008 Mar;22(3):409-13 [PMID: 18257657]
  18. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014 May 06;9 Suppl 1:65-83 [PMID: 24872704]
  19. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;107(12):3227-34 [PMID: 22442563]
  20. J Physiol. 2011 Mar 15;589(Pt 6):1295-306 [PMID: 21242257]
  21. J Physiol. 2011 Mar 15;589(Pt 6):1283-94 [PMID: 21242259]
  22. Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Nov;44(9):736-45 [PMID: 23018648]
  23. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Jul 30;163(2):326-37 [PMID: 17537515]
  24. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Jun;58(6):1648-55 [PMID: 21278011]
  25. J Biomed Opt. 2007 Mar-Apr;12(2):021008 [PMID: 17477715]
  26. Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):42-51 [PMID: 18321670]
  27. Hear Res. 2015 Jun;324:46-53 [PMID: 25796297]
  28. Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 25;5:13273 [PMID: 26305106]
  29. Biophys J. 2007 Oct 1;93(7):2567-80 [PMID: 17526565]
  30. Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Jan;42(1):69-75 [PMID: 19802885]
  31. Hear Res. 2014 May;311:72-88 [PMID: 24709273]
  32. Opt Lett. 2005 Mar 1;30(5):504-6 [PMID: 15789717]
  33. Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Jan;29(1):343-9 [PMID: 23712393]

MeSH Term

Animals
Cochlea
Cochlear Nerve
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
Female
Guinea Pigs
Infrared Rays
Lasers
Male
Optical Fibers
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pulselaserdurationstimulationNIRcochlearneuralopticaldurations810-nmOABRauditory20intensityrange300 μsOpticalcochleanear-infraredlimitedparameterneuronsshorterdeafenedOpticallyevokedbrainstemOABRsincreasedalongincreasingneuronresponseactivationpresentedalternativetechniqueelectricalduepotentialspatiallyselectivityenhancementfarstudiesselectedspaceexaminedpaperfocusedinvestigatingeffectespeciallyspiralganglionguineapigsstimulatedpulsedvivoradiationdeliveredfiberirradiatedtowardsmodiolusresponsesvariousparametersrecordedinvestigatedelicitedanimalsusingwideranged1000 μsResultsshowedradiantexposurespecificadditionmonotonicallybroadeningbasicallykeptstableeffectivestimulusevokingexperimentaldataprovidedevidenceoptimizeresultssuggestedoptimized810-nm-wavelengthEffectAuditoryCochleaNear-infrared

Similar Articles

Cited By