AIM: To evaluate outcomes associated with use of a saline coupled bipolar sealer during open partial liver resection.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis utilized the United States Premier™ insurance claims database (2010-2014). patients were selected with codes for liver malignancy and partial hepatectomy or lobectomy. Cases were defined by use the saline-coupled bipolar sealer; controls had no use. A Propensity Score algorithm was used to match one case to five controls. A deviation-based cost modeling (DBCM) approach provided an estimate of cost-effectiveness.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four cases and 720 controls were available for analysis. patients in the case cohort received fewer transfusions controls (18.1% 29.4%, = 0.007). In DBCM, more patients in the case cohort experienced "on-course" hospitalizations (53.5% 41.9%, = 0.009). The cost calculation showed an average savings in total hospitalization costs of $1027 for cases controls. In multivariate analysis, cases had lower odds of receiving a transfusion (OR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.27-0.71, = 0.0008).
CONCLUSION: Use of a saline-coupled bipolar sealer was associated with a greater proportion of patients with an "on course" hospitalization.
Acute Kidney Injury
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Blood Loss, Surgical
Blood Transfusion
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Case-Control Studies
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Databases, Factual
Electrosurgery
Female
Hepatectomy
Hospitalization
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult