Language as a coordination tool evolves slowly.

Tamas David-Barrett, Robin I M Dunbar
Author Information
  1. Tamas David-Barrett: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK; Facultad de Gobierno, CICS, Universidad del Desarrollo, Av. Plaza 680, San Carlos de Apoquindo, Las Condes, Santiago de Chile 7610658, Chile; Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiellinie 66, 24105 Kiel, Germany; Population Research Institute, Väestöliitto, Kalevankatu 16, Helsinki 00101, Finland. ORCID
  2. Robin I M Dunbar: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK; Department of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, PO Box 15500, Espoo 00076, Finland. ORCID

Abstract

Social living ultimately depends on coordination between group members, and communication is necessary to make this possible. We suggest that this might have been the key selection pressure acting on the evolution of language in humans and use a behavioural coordination model to explore the impact of communication efficiency on social group coordination. We show that when language production is expensive but there is an individual benefit to the efficiency with which individuals coordinate their behaviour, the evolution of efficient communication is selected for. Contrary to some views of language evolution, the speed of evolution is necessarily slow because there is no advantage in some individuals evolving communication abilities that much exceed those of the community at large. However, once a threshold competence has been achieved, evolution of higher order language skills may indeed be precipitate.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):8028-33 [PMID: 10393942]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 7;271(1540):725-32 [PMID: 15209106]
  3. Theor Popul Biol. 1998 Oct;54(2):146-60 [PMID: 9733656]
  4. Science. 2007 Sep 7;317(5843):1344-7 [PMID: 17823343]
  5. Nature. 2005 Feb 3;433(7025):513-6 [PMID: 15690039]
  6. Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1291-8 [PMID: 16251955]
  7. Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1767-70 [PMID: 16794075]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 2;110(1):216-21 [PMID: 23248298]
  9. Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):861-3 [PMID: 20631710]
  10. Science. 2010 Apr 30;328(5978):617-20 [PMID: 20431013]
  11. J Theor Biol. 2012 Sep 7;308:88-95 [PMID: 22609470]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 27;108 Suppl 4:21285-91 [PMID: 22198762]
  13. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 22;279(1731):1161-7 [PMID: 21920973]
  14. Science. 2000 May 5;288(5467):850-2 [PMID: 10797005]
  15. Biol Lett. 2005 Dec 22;1(4):381-5 [PMID: 17148212]
  16. Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):557-60 [PMID: 17148287]
  17. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 7;281(1790):null [PMID: 25056625]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Oct 7;274(1624):2429-36 [PMID: 17652066]
  19. Nature. 2009 Nov 5;462(7269):51-7 [PMID: 19890322]
  20. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 7;280(1750):20121878 [PMID: 23135681]
  21. Evol Psychol. 2013 Aug 14;11(4):845-54 [PMID: 23945312]
  22. Biol Lett. 2008 Dec 23;4(6):748-51 [PMID: 18765349]
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 28;95(9):5100-5 [PMID: 9560235]
  24. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jun 26;280(1765):20131151 [PMID: 23804623]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):13189-94 [PMID: 11687618]
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):439-44 [PMID: 15734699]
  27. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):771-9 [PMID: 19073482]
  28. Primates. 2006 Jan;47(1):14-26 [PMID: 16132168]
  29. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Jul;139(3):413-20 [PMID: 19235791]
  30. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 5;367(1597):1837-46 [PMID: 22641822]
  31. Science. 2009 Jun 5;324(5932):1293-8 [PMID: 19498163]
  32. Br J Psychol. 2012 May;103(2):149-68 [PMID: 22506741]
  33. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):719-42 [PMID: 19073475]
  34. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):557-61 [PMID: 16866738]
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 21;111(3):942-7 [PMID: 24395777]
  36. Science. 2010 Aug 27;329(5995):1081-5 [PMID: 20798320]
  37. Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):718-23 [PMID: 17151660]

Grants

  1. 295663/European Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0communicationevolutioncoordinationlanguagegroupefficiencysocialindividualsSociallivingultimatelydependsmembersnecessarymakepossiblesuggestmightkeyselectionpressureactinghumansusebehaviouralmodelexploreimpactshowproductionexpensiveindividualbenefitcoordinatebehaviourefficientselectedContraryviewsspeednecessarilyslowadvantageevolvingabilitiesmuchexceedcommunitylargeHoweverthresholdcompetenceachievedhigherorderskillsmayindeedprecipitateLanguagetoolevolvesslowlyagent-basedmodelscostssize

Similar Articles

Cited By