Which is best for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty or non-surgical treatment? A study protocol for a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Shun-Li Kan, Zhi-Fang Yuan, Ling-Xiao Chen, Jing-Cheng Sun, Guang-Zhi Ning, Shi-Qing Feng
Author Information
  1. Shun-Li Kan: Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  2. Zhi-Fang Yuan: School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
  3. Ling-Xiao Chen: Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  4. Jing-Cheng Sun: Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  5. Guang-Zhi Ning: Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  6. Shi-Qing Feng: Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) commonly cause both acute and chronic back pain, substantial spinal deformity, functional disability and decreased quality of life and increase the risk of future vertebral fractures and mortality. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), balloon kyphoplasty (BK) and non-surgical treatment (NST) are mostly used for the treatment of OVCFs. However, which treatment is preferred is unknown. The purpose of this study is to comprehensively review the literature and ascertain the relative efficacy and safety of BK, PVP and NST for patients with OVCFs using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will comprehensively search PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, to include randomided controlled trials that compare BK, PVP or NST for treating OVCFs. The risk of bias for individual studies will be assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook. Bayesian network meta-analysis will be performed to compare the efficacy and safety of BK, PVP and NST. The quality of evidence will be evaluated by GRADE.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and patient consent are not required since this study is a meta-analysis based on published studies. The results of this network meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039452; Pre-results.

Keywords

References

  1. Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):932-44 [PMID: 20213715]
  2. Pain Physician. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):309-20 [PMID: 23877447]
  3. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 9;332(6):351-5 [PMID: 7823996]
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jul;90(7):1479-86 [PMID: 18594096]
  5. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;64(2):163-71 [PMID: 20688472]
  6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24 Suppl):12S-16S [PMID: 9431639]
  7. Prev Vet Med. 2007 May 16;79(2-4):244-56 [PMID: 17292499]
  8. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(5):637-50 [PMID: 16283064]
  9. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123153 [PMID: 25874802]
  10. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 03;8(10):e76654 [PMID: 24098547]
  11. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84 [PMID: 26030634]
  12. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1 [PMID: 25554246]
  13. BMJ. 2011 Jul 12;343:d3952 [PMID: 21750078]
  14. Neurochirurgie. 1987;33(2):166-8 [PMID: 3600949]
  15. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999 Sep;22(8):583-8 [PMID: 10532244]
  16. Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:136 [PMID: 24113837]
  17. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 15;26(14):1631-8 [PMID: 11464159]
  18. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 15;26(14):1511-5 [PMID: 11462078]
  19. Perm J. 2012 Fall;16(4):46-51 [PMID: 23251117]
  20. Med J Aust. 2006 Feb 6;184(3):113-7 [PMID: 16460295]
  21. Stat Med. 2004 Oct 30;23(20):3105-24 [PMID: 15449338]
  22. Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):607-17 [PMID: 23104435]
  23. BMJ. 2014 Sep 24;349:g5630 [PMID: 25252733]
  24. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Nov;44(11):2611-9 [PMID: 11710717]
  25. Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):641-56 [PMID: 23804508]
  26. Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):618-40 [PMID: 23804507]
  27. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(1):83-91 [PMID: 10663363]
  28. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928 [PMID: 22008217]
  29. BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 19;5(11):e009369 [PMID: 26586326]
  30. Arch Osteoporos. 2011;6:59-155 [PMID: 22886101]
  31. Stat Methods Med Res. 1996 Dec;5(4):339-55 [PMID: 9004377]

MeSH Term

Bayes Theorem
Bone Cements
Fractures, Compression
Humans
Kyphoplasty
Network Meta-Analysis
Osteoporosis
Osteoporotic Fractures
Spinal Fractures
Treatment Outcome
Vertebroplasty

Chemicals

Bone Cements

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0meta-analysisnetworkwillvertebralOVCFsPVPBKtreatmentNSTcompressionfracturesvertebroplastyballoonkyphoplastynon-surgicalstudyBayesianqualityriskcomprehensivelyefficacysafetyANDCochranecomparestudiesosteoporoticpercutaneousINTRODUCTION:OsteoporoticcommonlycauseacutechronicbackpainsubstantialspinaldeformityfunctionaldisabilitydecreasedlifeincreasefuturemortalityPercutaneousmostlyusedHoweverpreferredunknownpurposereviewliteratureascertainrelativepatientsusingMETHODSANALYSIS:searchPubMedEMBASECentralRegisterControlledTrialsincluderandomidedcontrolledtrialstreatingbiasindividualassessedaccordingHandbookperformedevidenceevaluatedGRADEETHICSDISSEMINATION:Ethicalapprovalpatientconsentrequiredsincebasedpublishedresultssubmittedpeer-reviewedjournalpublicationPROSPEROREGISTRATIONNUMBER:CRD42016039452Pre-resultsbestfractures:treatment?protocol

Similar Articles

Cited By