Motuporamine Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents and Antibiotic Enhancers against Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Diane Borselli, Marine Blanchet, Jean-Michel Bolla, Aaron Muth, Kristen Skruber, Otto Phanstiel, Jean Michel Brunel
Author Information
  1. Diane Borselli: Aix-Marseille Université, IRBA, TMCD2 UMR-MD1, Faculté de Médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
  2. Marine Blanchet: Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), CNRS, UMR7258, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, UM 105, Inserm, U1068, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
  3. Jean-Michel Bolla: Aix-Marseille Université, IRBA, TMCD2 UMR-MD1, Faculté de Médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
  4. Aaron Muth: Department of Medical Education, University of Central Florida, 12722 Research Parkway, Orlando, FL, 32826-3227, USA.
  5. Kristen Skruber: Department of Medical Education, University of Central Florida, 12722 Research Parkway, Orlando, FL, 32826-3227, USA.
  6. Otto Phanstiel: Department of Medical Education, University of Central Florida, 12722 Research Parkway, Orlando, FL, 32826-3227, USA.
  7. Jean Michel Brunel: Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), CNRS, UMR7258, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, UM 105, Inserm, U1068, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.

Abstract

Dihydromotuporamine C and its derivatives were evaluated for their in vitro antimicrobial activities and antibiotic enhancement properties against Gram-negative bacteria and clinical isolates. The mechanism of action of one of these derivatives, MOTU-N44, was investigated against Enterobacter aerogenes by using fluorescent dyes to evaluate outer-membrane depolarization and permeabilization. Its efficiency correlated with inhibition of dye transport, thus suggesting that these molecules inhibit drug transporters by de-energization of the efflux pump rather than by direct interaction of the molecule with the pump. This suggests that depowering the efflux pump provides another strategy to address antibiotic resistance.

Keywords

References

  1. Microbiol Rev. 1992 Sep;56(3):395-411 [PMID: 1406489]
  2. Front Pharmacol. 2014 Jan 03;4:168 [PMID: 24427138]
  3. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jun 15;40(12):1792-8 [PMID: 15909268]
  4. J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 19;46(13):2663-71 [PMID: 12801230]
  5. J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 1;274(1):29-35 [PMID: 9867806]
  6. Amino Acids. 2007 Aug;33(2):305-13 [PMID: 17410331]
  7. J Med Chem. 2016 Apr 14;59(7):3140-51 [PMID: 26964758]
  8. J Med Chem. 2014 Jan 23;57(2):348-63 [PMID: 24405276]
  9. J Med Chem. 2005 Jun 2;48(11):3832-9 [PMID: 15916435]
  10. J Membr Biol. 1985;84(3):249-58 [PMID: 4032456]
  11. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Jan;45(1):105-16 [PMID: 11120952]
  12. Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Dec;24(12):1497-503 [PMID: 17160049]
  13. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 Jan;12(1):63-8 [PMID: 16460548]
  14. J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 19;46(13):2672-82 [PMID: 12801231]
  15. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 12;6(4):e18547 [PMID: 21533264]
  16. Microbiology (Reading). 1998 Nov;144 ( Pt 11):3003-9 [PMID: 9846735]
  17. ACS Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 10;1(7):288-303 [PMID: 27622819]
  18. J Bacteriol. 2007 Oct;189(20):7213-22 [PMID: 17693506]
  19. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Feb;37(2):354-6 [PMID: 8383945]
  20. J Med Chem. 2003 Nov 20;46(24):5129-38 [PMID: 14613316]
  21. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Aug;65(8):1688-93 [PMID: 20551217]
  22. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 May 1;40(9):1333-41 [PMID: 15825037]
  23. J Med Chem. 2014 May 22;57(10):4263-72 [PMID: 24801877]
  24. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003 Dec;67(4):593-656 [PMID: 14665678]
  25. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21196 [PMID: 21698261]
  26. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Oct;44(10):3623-7 [PMID: 17021090]
  27. Trends Microbiol. 1997 Jan;5(1):37-42 [PMID: 9025234]
  28. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Mar;82(4):773-83 [PMID: 19198831]
  29. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Sep;33(9):1524-32 [PMID: 17549457]
  30. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012 Aug;10(8):917-34 [PMID: 23030331]
  31. Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):389-95 [PMID: 11807545]
  32. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Apr;59(4):786-90 [PMID: 17307769]
  33. Future Med Chem. 2016 Jun;8(9):963-73 [PMID: 27227839]
  34. J Bacteriol. 1985 Apr;162(1):9-20 [PMID: 3980449]
  35. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013 Mar 1;21(5):1174-9 [PMID: 23352753]
  36. Chembiochem. 2017 Feb 1;18(3):276-283 [PMID: 28098416]
  37. J Med Chem. 2014 May 22;57(10):4023-34 [PMID: 24784222]
  38. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003 Apr;21(4):364-91 [PMID: 12672587]

MeSH Term

Alkaloids
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Anti-Infective Agents
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Enterobacter aerogenes
Gram-Negative Bacteria
Gram-Positive Bacteria
Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring
Membrane Transport Proteins
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Polyamines

Chemicals

Alkaloids
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Anti-Infective Agents
Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring
MOTU-N44 compound
Membrane Transport Proteins
Polyamines
motuporamine A

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0derivativespumpantimicrobialantibioticeffluxresistanceDihydromotuporamine CevaluatedvitroactivitiesenhancementpropertiesGram-negativebacteriaclinicalisolatesmechanismactiononeMOTU-N44investigatedEnterobacteraerogenesusingfluorescentdyesevaluateouter-membranedepolarizationpermeabilizationefficiencycorrelatedinhibitiondyetransportthussuggestingmoleculesinhibitdrugtransportersde-energizationratherdirectinteractionmoleculesuggestsdepoweringprovidesanotherstrategyaddressMotuporamineDerivativesAntimicrobialAgentsAntibioticEnhancersResistantGram-NegativeBacteriaantibioticsagentsbacterialmembranesmotuporaminepolyamine

Similar Articles

Cited By