Acute and late vaginal toxicity after adjuvant high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy in patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer: is local therapy with hyaluronic acid of clinical benefit?

Concetta Laliscia, Durim Delishaj, Maria Grazia Fabrini, Alessandra Gonnelli, Riccardo Morganti, Franco Perrone, Roberta Tana, Fabiola Paiar, Angiolo Gadducci
Author Information
  1. Concetta Laliscia: Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology.
  2. Durim Delishaj: Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology.
  3. Maria Grazia Fabrini: Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology.
  4. Alessandra Gonnelli: Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology.
  5. Riccardo Morganti: Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Statistics.
  6. Franco Perrone: Department of Translational Medicine, U.O Fisica Sanitaria.
  7. Roberta Tana: Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  8. Fabiola Paiar: Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology.
  9. Angiolo Gadducci: Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid (HA) in the prevention of acute and late vaginal toxicities after high-dose-rate (HDR) vaginal brachytherapy (BT).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and January 2015, we retrospectively analyzed 126 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy and adjuvant HDR-vaginal BT +/- adjuvant chemotherapy. The total dose prescription was 21 Gy in 3 fractions (one fraction for week). Vaginal ovules containing 5 mg of HA were given for whole duration of vaginal BT and for the two following weeks. Acute and late toxicities were evaluated according to CTCAE vs 4.02.
RESULTS: According to the revised FIGO 2009 classification, most tumors were in stage IA (30.9%) and in stage IB (57.9%). Thirty-three patients (26.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy before vaginal BT. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and five-year overall survival (OS) were 88% and 93%, respectively. The most common grade 1-2 acute toxicities were vaginal inflammation (18 patients, 14.3%) and dyspareunia (7 patients, 5.5%). Two patients (1.6%) had more than one toxicity. Late toxicity occurred in 20 patients (15.9%). Grade 1-2 late toxicities were fibrosis (14 patients, 11.1%) and telangiectasias (7 patients, 5.5%). Six patients (4.8%) had more than one late toxicity. No grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: These results appear to suggest that the local therapy with HA is of clinical benefit for intermediate risk endometrial cancer patients who receive adjuvant HDR-vaginal BT after surgery. A randomized trial comparing HA treatment vs. no local treatment in this clinical setting is warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of HA in preventing vaginal BT-related vaginal toxicity.

Keywords

References

  1. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Jun;97(3):887-92 [PMID: 15943991]
  2. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 May 1;62(1):111-7 [PMID: 15850910]
  3. BJOG. 2007 Nov;114(11):1313-20 [PMID: 17803718]
  4. Brachytherapy. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):58-67 [PMID: 22265439]
  5. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 May 1;38(2):373-80 [PMID: 9226326]
  6. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jul;106(1):215-20 [PMID: 17482665]
  7. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Dec;117(3):559-81 [PMID: 26683800]
  8. Gynecol Oncol. 2003 May;89(2):288-94 [PMID: 12713993]
  9. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32(1):65-8 [PMID: 21446328]
  10. Lancet. 2010 Mar 6;375(9717):816-23 [PMID: 20206777]
  11. Minerva Ginecol. 2015 Dec;67(6):523-31 [PMID: 26788875]
  12. Brachytherapy. 2008 Apr-Jun;7(2):195-9 [PMID: 18358790]
  13. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Dec 1;42(5):1033-9 [PMID: 9869226]
  14. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 May;78(2):79-91 [PMID: 20418109]
  15. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;27(4):302-7 [PMID: 26134173]
  16. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 20;27(21):3547-56 [PMID: 19546404]
  17. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;54(2):215-8 [PMID: 21508690]
  18. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000 May;10(3):233-238 [PMID: 11240680]
  19. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jul 1;53(3):707-13 [PMID: 12062616]
  20. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1289-300 [PMID: 7635768]
  21. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Nov;139(2):300-5 [PMID: 26363212]
  22. Cancer J. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):45-7 [PMID: 19197173]
  23. Radiother Oncol. 1983 Nov;1(2):187-91 [PMID: 6680223]
  24. J Intern Med. 1997 Jul;242(1):49-55 [PMID: 9260566]
  25. Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Aug;66(2):179-89 [PMID: 9264560]
  26. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2015 Oct;7(5):357-62 [PMID: 26622241]
  27. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Aug 1;62(5):1385-9 [PMID: 16029797]
  28. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):413-25 [PMID: 16055605]
  29. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1638-48 [PMID: 22176868]
  30. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Nov 7;104(21):1625-34 [PMID: 22962693]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsvaginallateHAtoxicitiesBTadjuvanttoxicityendometrialhyaluronicacidacutebrachytherapycancerone59%localclinicalevaluatehigh-dose-rateJanuaryHDR-vaginalchemotherapy3Acutevs4stagesurvivalgrade1-21475%therapyintermediaterisktreatmentPURPOSE:aimpresentstudyeffectivenesspreventionHDRMATERIALANDMETHODS:20112015retrospectivelyanalyzed126underwentextrafascialhysterectomywithoutlymphadenectomy+/-totaldoseprescription21GyfractionsfractionweekVaginalovulescontainingmggivenwholedurationtwofollowingweeksevaluatedaccordingCTCAE02RESULTS:AccordingrevisedFIGO2009classificationtumorsIA30IB57Thirty-three262%receivedFive-yeardisease-freeDFSfive-yearoverallOS88%93%respectivelycommoninflammation183%dyspareuniaTwo16%Lateoccurred2015Gradefibrosis111%telangiectasiasSix8%higherobservedCONCLUSIONS:resultsappearsuggestbenefitreceivesurgeryrandomizedtrialcomparingsettingwarrantedefficacypreventingBT-relatedcancer:benefit?HDR

Similar Articles

Cited By