Severe carotid artery stenosis evaluated by ultrasound is associated with post stroke vascular cognitive impairment.

Xuefeng Li, Xiangling Ma, Jing Lin, Xiangqin He, Feng Tian, Dongmei Kong
Author Information
  1. Xuefeng Li: Department of Ultrasonography Jining No.1 People's Hospital Jining Shandong China.
  2. Xiangling Ma: Department of Ultrasonography Jining No.1 People's Hospital Jining Shandong China.
  3. Jing Lin: Health Supervision Institute Zoucheng Municipal Health Bureau Zoucheng Shandong China.
  4. Xiangqin He: Department of Ultrasonography Jining No.1 People's Hospital Jining Shandong China.
  5. Feng Tian: Department of Neurology Jining No.1 People's Hospital Jining Shandong China.
  6. Dongmei Kong: Department of Ultrasonography Jining No.1 People's Hospital Jining Shandong China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke has been recognized as one key cause of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between carotid artery stenosis and post VCI in acute ischemic stroke patients.
METHODS: In this study, B-mode ultrasound was applied to measure the degree of carotid artery stenosis. After 1 year, the stroke patients' cognitive function was assessed by the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score. The relationship between the VCI and degree of carotid artery stenosis was evaluated by multivariate regression analysis.
RESULTS: VCI was observed in 136 (37.2%) of the 365 participants. High degree of carotid artery stenosis was significantly correlated with VCI ( < .01), and this correlation remained unchanged even adjustment for age, gender, education level, stroke features, and vascular risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that high-grade stenosis of carotid artery is positively correlated with post stroke VCI in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The evaluation of 1 year post stroke cognitive function may be a potential tool for screening stroke patients at risk of VCI.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neuroimaging. 1991 Nov;1(4):168-72 [PMID: 10149810]
  2. Neurology. 2000 Jul 12;55(1):30-4 [PMID: 10891899]
  3. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jan 1;71(1):114-9 [PMID: 18098213]
  4. Neurosurgery. 2010 Aug;67(2):484-93; discussion 493-4 [PMID: 20644437]
  5. Can Med Assoc J. 1951 Jul;65(1):1-7 [PMID: 14848780]
  6. Brain Behav. 2016 Nov 22;7(1):e00606 [PMID: 28127524]
  7. Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 25;6:19556 [PMID: 26806793]
  8. J Neurol Sci. 2009 Aug 15;283(1-2):36-40 [PMID: 19269651]
  9. Stroke. 1994 Dec;25(12):2377-83 [PMID: 7974576]
  10. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146890 [PMID: 26751070]
  11. J Neurol Sci. 2002 Nov 15;203-204:103-7 [PMID: 12417366]
  12. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec;50(6):1314-9 [PMID: 19837533]
  13. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 8;342(23):1693-700 [PMID: 10841871]
  14. Int J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 1;121(2):148-54 [PMID: 17196687]
  15. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;146:64-70 [PMID: 27152468]
  16. Surgery. 1983 May;93(5):683-7 [PMID: 6845174]
  17. Acta Neurol Scand. 1982 Aug;66(2):145-59 [PMID: 7136482]
  18. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2014 Jul-Sep;28(3):206-18 [PMID: 24632990]
  19. Curr Opin Neurol. 2002 Feb;15(1):79-84 [PMID: 11796954]
  20. Stroke. 1998 Jan;29(1):75-81 [PMID: 9445332]
  21. Stroke. 1996 Aug;27(8):1290-5 [PMID: 8711788]
  22. Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4):1229-36 [PMID: 19246701]
  23. Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):695-701 [PMID: 15007116]
  24. Neurology. 2001 Jan 9;56(1):42-8 [PMID: 11148234]
  25. Stroke. 2004 Feb;35(2):404-9 [PMID: 14726556]
  26. Age Ageing. 2002 Jan;31(1):43-8 [PMID: 11850307]
  27. Atherosclerosis. 2012 Oct;224(2):506-10 [PMID: 22854188]
  28. Neurol Res. 2007 Apr;29(3):251-5 [PMID: 17178010]
  29. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2011 Sep;24(3):145-51 [PMID: 21945986]
  30. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Apr;50(4):700-6 [PMID: 11982671]
  31. Neurology. 2000 Mar 14;54(5):1124-31 [PMID: 10720286]
  32. J Vasc Surg. 1994 May;19(5):818-27; discussion 827-8 [PMID: 8170035]
  33. J Neurol Sci. 2004 Aug 30;223(2):129-34 [PMID: 15337613]
  34. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Oct;27(7):859-66 [PMID: 16183618]
  35. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989 Aug;11(4):461-70 [PMID: 2760181]
  36. Stroke. 2007 Apr;38(4):1396 [PMID: 17347469]
  37. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;25(4):719-26 [PMID: 21508532]
  38. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;25(4):389-94 [PMID: 19750556]
  39. Atherosclerosis. 2011 Nov;219(1):330-3 [PMID: 21831374]
  40. Gerontology. 1998;44(2):95-105 [PMID: 9523221]
  41. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Aug;30(3):244-51 [PMID: 20664257]
  42. J Neurol Sci. 2002 Nov 15;203-204:23-7 [PMID: 12417352]
  43. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992 Jan;85(1):58-62 [PMID: 1546536]
  44. Cortex. 1988 Jun;24(2):223-30 [PMID: 3416605]
  45. Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58(1):113-30 [PMID: 6966542]
  46. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Feb 17;140(4):237-47 [PMID: 14970146]
  47. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012 Apr;24(2):113-6 [PMID: 22842831]

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Ischemia
Carotid Stenosis
Cognitive Dysfunction
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke
Ultrasonography

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0strokeVCIcarotidarterystenosiscognitivevascularpostischemicimpairmentpatientsultrasounddegreestudycorrelationacute1 yearfunctionstateexaminationscoreevaluatedcorrelatedriskBACKGROUND:AcuterecognizedonekeycausepurposeevaluateMETHODS:B-modeappliedmeasurepatients'assessedmini-mentalMMSErelationshipmultivariateregressionanalysisRESULTS:observed136372%365participantsHighsignificantly<01remainedunchangedevenadjustmentagegendereducationlevelfeaturesfactorsCONCLUSIONS:findingsindicatehigh-gradepositivelyevaluationmaypotentialtoolscreeningSevereassociatedmini‐mental

Similar Articles

Cited By