Salvage therapy with bendamustine for temozolomide refractory recurrent anaplastic gliomas: a prospective phase II trial.

Marc C Chamberlain, Howard Colman, Bryan T Kim, Jeffrey Raizer
Author Information
  1. Marc C Chamberlain: Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, MS: G4-940, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. chambemc@u.washington.edu.
  2. Howard Colman: Department of Neurosurgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  3. Bryan T Kim: Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  4. Jeffrey Raizer: Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Abstract

There is no standard therapy for recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG). Salvage therapies include alkylator-based chemotherapy, re-resection with or without carmustine implants, re-irradiation and bevacizumab. Bendamustine is a novel bifunctional alkylator with CNS penetration never previously evaluated in AG. Assess response and toxicity of bendamustine in recurrent AG in a phase II trial. Adults with radiation and temozolomide refractory recurrent AG were treated with bendamustine. A cycle of bendamustine was defined as two consecutive days of treatment (100 mg/m/day) administered once every 4 weeks. Success of treatment was defined as progression free survival (PFS) at 6 months of 40 % or better. Twenty-six adults [16 males; 10 females: median age 40 years (range 30-65)] were treated, 12 at first recurrence and 17 at second recurrence. Prior salvage therapy included re-resection (14), chemotherapy (11) and re-radiation (2). Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities included lymphopenia (11 patients; Grade 4 in 3), myalgia, pneumonia, diarrhea, leukopenia, allergic reaction and thrombocytopenia in one patient each. One patient discontinued therapy due to toxicity. There were five instances of bendamustine dose delays all due to lymphopenia. There were no dose reductions due to toxicity. The median number of cycles of therapy was 3 (range 1-8). Best radiographic response was progressive disease in 12 (46 %), stable disease in 13 (50 %) and partial response in 1 (4 %). Median, 6- and 12-month PFS was 2.7 months (range 1-52), 27 and 8 % respectively. In patients with recurrent AG refractory to Z, bendamustine has manageable toxicity and modest single agent activity though not meeting pre-specified study criteria.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8863-9 [PMID: 16314646]
  2. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):337-43 [PMID: 23071247]
  3. Nat Genet. 2015 May;47(5):458-68 [PMID: 25848751]
  4. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 20;28(12 ):2051-7 [PMID: 20308655]
  5. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2299-304 [PMID: 12805330]
  6. J Neurooncol. 2009 Feb;91(3):359-67 [PMID: 18953491]
  7. Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Jan;129(1):133-46 [PMID: 25427834]
  8. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008 Jun;7(6):473-4 [PMID: 18511926]
  9. J Clin Oncol. 1990 Jul;8(7):1277-80 [PMID: 2358840]
  10. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2481-98 [PMID: 26061751]
  11. Cell. 2016 Jan 28;164(3):550-63 [PMID: 26824661]
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 20;28(18):3048-53 [PMID: 20479391]
  13. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17 (9):2762-71 [PMID: 10561351]
  14. Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Aug;114(2):97-109 [PMID: 17618441]
  15. J Neurooncol. 2014 May;118(1):155-62 [PMID: 24584709]
  16. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12 ):2305-11 [PMID: 12805331]
  17. Neuro Oncol. 2011 Oct;13(10):1143-50 [PMID: 21865400]
  18. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2499-508 [PMID: 26061753]
  19. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Aug;17(8):2572-8 [PMID: 10561324]
  20. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jan 1;14(1):309-17 [PMID: 18172283]
  21. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5874-80 [PMID: 19901110]
  22. J Neurooncol. 2015 Apr;122(2):329-38 [PMID: 25563816]
  23. Brain Pathol. 2014 Sep;24(5):429-35 [PMID: 24990071]
  24. J Neurooncol. 2011 Dec;105(3):523-30 [PMID: 21626071]
  25. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Sep 1;11(9):1114-51 [PMID: 24029126]
  26. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):783-90 [PMID: 24516018]
  27. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):344-50 [PMID: 23071237]
  28. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):e395-403 [PMID: 25079102]
  29. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 20;27(9):1492-501 [PMID: 19224851]
  30. Cancer Treat Res. 2015;163:89-101 [PMID: 25468227]
  31. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2555-7 [PMID: 26061754]
  32. Lancet. 1995 Apr 22;345(8956):1008-12 [PMID: 7723496]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
Bendamustine Hydrochloride
Brain Neoplasms
Dacarbazine
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Female
Glioma
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Prospective Studies
Salvage Therapy
Temozolomide
Treatment Outcome

Chemicals

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
Dacarbazine
Bendamustine Hydrochloride
Temozolomide

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0AGbendamustinetherapyrecurrenttoxicityrefractoryresponserange3dueanaplasticgliomaSalvagechemotherapyre-resectionBendamustinephaseIItrialtemozolomidetreateddefinedtreatmentPFSmedian12recurrenceincluded112Gradelymphopeniapatientspatientdosediseasestandardtherapiesincludealkylator-basedwithoutcarmustineimplantsre-irradiationbevacizumabnovelbifunctionalalkylatorCNSpenetrationneverpreviouslyevaluatedAssessAdultsradiationcycletwoconsecutivedays100 mg/m/dayadministeredevery4 weeksSuccessprogressionfreesurvival6 months40 %betterTwenty-sixadults[16males10females:age40years30-65]first17secondPriorsalvage14re-radiationtreatment-relatedtoxicities4myalgiapneumoniadiarrhealeukopeniaallergicreactionthrombocytopeniaoneOnediscontinuedfiveinstancesdelaysreductionsnumbercycles1-8Bestradiographicprogressive46 %stable1350 %partial14 %Median6-12-month7 months1-52278 %respectivelyZmanageablemodestsingleagentactivitythoughmeetingpre-specifiedstudycriteriagliomas:prospectiveAnaplasticTemozolomide

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)