Application of an optimized flow cytometry-based quantification of Platelet Activation (PACT): Monitoring platelet activation in platelet concentrates.

Cécile H Kicken, Mark Roest, Yvonne M C Henskens, Bas de Laat, Dana Huskens
Author Information
  1. Cécile H Kicken: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Mark Roest: Synapse Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  3. Yvonne M C Henskens: Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  4. Bas de Laat: Synapse Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  5. Dana Huskens: Synapse Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that flow cytometry is a reliable test to quantify platelet function in stored platelet concentrates (PC). It is thought that flow cytometry is laborious and hence expensive. We have optimized the flow cytometry-based quantification of agonist induced platelet activation (PACT) to a labor, time and more cost-efficient test. Currently the quality of PCs is only monitored by visual inspection, because available assays are unreliable or too laborious for use in a clinical transfusion laboratory. Therefore, the PACT was applied to monitor PC activation during storage.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The optimized PACT was used to monitor 5 PCs during 10 days of storage. In brief, optimized PACT uses a ready-to-use reaction mix, which is stable at -20°C. When needed, a test strip is thawed and platelet activation is initiated by mixing PC with PACT. PACT was based on the following agonists: adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen-related peptide (CRP) and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP-6). Platelet activation was measured as P-selectin expression. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) was performed as a reference.
RESULTS: Both PACT and LTA showed platelet function decline during 10-day storage after stimulation with ADP and collagen/CRP; furthermore, PACT showed decreasing TRAP-induced activation. Major differences between the two tests are that PACT is able to measure the status of platelets in the absence of agonists, and it can differentiate between the number of activated platelets and the amount of activation, whereas LTA only measures aggregation in response to an agonist. Also, PACT is more time-efficient compared to LTA and allows high-throughput analysis.
CONCLUSION: PACT is an optimized platelet function test that can be used to monitor the activation of PCs. PACT has the same accuracy as LTA with regard to monitoring PCs, but it is superior to both LTA and conventional flow cytometry based tests with regard to labor-, time- and cost efficiency.

References

  1. Vox Sang. 2011 Jul;101(1):1-9 [PMID: 21668862]
  2. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2006;35(1-2):67-82 [PMID: 16855350]
  3. J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Apr 10;:null [PMID: 23574625]
  4. J Physiol. 1963 Aug;168:178-95 [PMID: 14056485]
  5. J Lab Clin Med. 1978 Jul;92(1):53-64 [PMID: 96196]
  6. Vox Sang. 2016 Feb;110(2):116-25 [PMID: 26389538]
  7. Transfusion. 2013 Aug;53(8):1780-7 [PMID: 23216254]
  8. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997 Apr;17(4):646-53 [PMID: 9108776]
  9. Transfusion. 2002 Jul;42(7):847-54 [PMID: 12375656]
  10. Transfusion. 1997 Jan;37(1):12-7 [PMID: 9024484]
  11. Transfus Med Hemother. 2013 Apr;40(2):117-25 [PMID: 23652405]
  12. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):205-13 [PMID: 25383671]
  13. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;30(6):270-382 [PMID: 23656742]
  14. Transfusion. 2003 Jan;43(1):2-6 [PMID: 12519424]
  15. Blood. 2014 Mar 6;123(10):1556-63 [PMID: 24385537]
  16. Vox Sang. 2012 Jul;103(1):79-82 [PMID: 22220640]
  17. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Feb 18;11:133-48 [PMID: 25733843]
  18. Platelets. 2015;26(2):177-85 [PMID: 24679340]
  19. Thromb Res. 2015 Apr;135(4):679-83 [PMID: 25601171]
  20. Transfusion. 1996 Feb;36(2):128-32 [PMID: 8614962]
  21. J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Dec;11(12):2193-6 [PMID: 24148217]

MeSH Term

Blood Platelets
Blood Preservation
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Platelet Activation
Platelet Aggregation
Platelet Function Tests

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PACTplateletactivationLTAflowoptimizedtestPCscytometryfunctionPCmonitorstorageconcentrateslaboriouscytometry-basedquantificationagonistusedbasedADPpeptidePlateletshowedtestsplateletscanregardBACKGROUND:Previousstudiesshownreliablequantifystoredthoughthenceexpensiveinducedlabortimecost-efficientCurrentlyqualitymonitoredvisualinspectionavailableassaysunreliableuseclinicaltransfusionlaboratoryThereforeappliedSTUDYDESIGNANDMETHODS:510daysbriefusesready-to-usereactionmixstable-20°Cneededstripthawedinitiatedmixingfollowingagonists:adenosinediphosphatecollagen-relatedCRPthrombinreceptor-activatingTRAP-6measuredP-selectinexpressionLighttransmissionaggregometryperformedreferenceRESULTS:decline10-daystimulationcollagen/CRPfurthermoredecreasingTRAP-inducedMajordifferencestwoablemeasurestatusabsenceagonistsdifferentiatenumberactivatedamountwhereasmeasuresaggregationresponseAlsotime-efficientcomparedallowshigh-throughputanalysisCONCLUSION:accuracymonitoringsuperiorconventionallabor-time-costefficiencyApplicationActivation:Monitoring

Similar Articles

Cited By