Effects of Mattress Material on Body Pressure Profiles in Different Sleeping Postures.

Fan-Zhe Low, Matthew Chin-Heng Chua, Pan-Yin Lim, Chen-Hua Yeow
Author Information
  1. Fan-Zhe Low: Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  2. Matthew Chin-Heng Chua: Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  3. Pan-Yin Lim: Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  4. Chen-Hua Yeow: Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the body contact pressure profiles of 2 types of mattresses: latex and polyurethane.
METHODS: Twenty participants were required to lie down on the different mattresses in 3 different postures for 6 minutes, and their body contact pressure profiles were recorded with a pressure mat sensor.
RESULTS: The data indicated that the latex mattress was able to reduce the peak body pressure on the torso and buttocks and achieve a higher proportion of low-pressure regions compared with the polyurethane mattress.
CONCLUSIONS: Latex mattress reduced peak body pressure and achieved a more even distribution of pressure compared with polyurethane mattress across different sleeping postures.

Keywords

References

  1. Appl Ergon. 1998 Feb;29(1):35-9 [PMID: 9769087]
  2. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;9(5):338-45 [PMID: 17998952]
  3. J Chiropr Med. 2006 Winter;5(4):128-34 [PMID: 19674684]
  4. Appl Ergon. 2008 Jan;39(1):123-30 [PMID: 17618596]
  5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001735 [PMID: 15266452]
  6. Appl Ergon. 2000 Oct;31(5):487-97 [PMID: 11059462]
  7. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Feb;25(2):88-92 [PMID: 11896375]
  8. Appl Ergon. 2006 May;37(3):297-304 [PMID: 16169512]
  9. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001735 [PMID: 10796662]
  10. J Clin Nurs. 2009 Sep;18(17):2521-9 [PMID: 19694879]
  11. Med J Aust. 1984 Jan 21;140(2):87-9 [PMID: 6546408]
  12. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2004;14(4):285-304 [PMID: 15447627]
  13. Gait Posture. 2006 Aug;24(1):54-61 [PMID: 16112574]
  14. Adv Biomed Res. 2015 Feb 23;4:61 [PMID: 25802830]
  15. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:4160-3 [PMID: 24110648]
  16. Appl Ergon. 1998 Dec;29(6):491-7 [PMID: 9796795]
  17. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;59(2):131-6 [PMID: 11825133]
  18. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Jun 15;8(3):301-7 [PMID: 22701388]
  19. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2015 Feb;61(2):38-46 [PMID: 25654780]
  20. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 May;85(5):430-5 [PMID: 16628150]
  21. J Chiropr Med. 2009 Mar;8(1):1-8 [PMID: 19646380]
  22. Appl Human Sci. 1997 May;16(3):97-102 [PMID: 9230521]
  23. J Appl Biomech. 2007 May;23(2):119-27 [PMID: 17603131]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pressurebodymattresscomparedpolyurethanedifferentcontactprofileslatexposturespeakPressureOBJECTIVES:study2typesmattresses:METHODS:Twentyparticipantsrequiredliemattresses36minutesrecordedmatsensorRESULTS:dataindicatedablereducetorsobuttocksachievehigherproportionlow-pressureregionsCONCLUSIONS:LatexreducedachievedevendistributionacrosssleepingEffectsMattressMaterialBodyProfilesDifferentSleepingPosturesBedsPostureUlcerSleepSupinePosition

Similar Articles

Cited By