Fix and replace; an emerging paradigm for treating acetabular fractures.

Colin G Murphy, Andrew D Carrothers
Author Information
  1. Colin G Murphy: Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke's Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  2. Andrew D Carrothers: Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke's Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Abstract

Although technically challenging even for the experienced surgeon, simultaneous open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabular fracture and total hip replacement (THR) have some potential advantages over the more traditional treatment options in specific patient subgroups; theoretically allowing immediate weight bearing and faster rehabilitation, reducing the cost of inpatient stay, and reducing the risks of early and late local complications associated with standard treatment for this type of injury. We review the evolution of the indications and techniques, outline the surgical challenges, and discuss implant options and outcomes for this treatment paradigm.

Keywords

References

  1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001 Jan-Feb;9(1):18-28 [PMID: 11174160]
  2. Injury. 2011 Feb;42(2):178-82 [PMID: 20850741]
  3. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jun;88(6):776-82 [PMID: 16720773]
  4. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 May;24(5):263-70 [PMID: 20418730]
  5. J Orthop Trauma. 1994 Oct;8(5):397-403 [PMID: 7996322]
  6. Injury. 2012 Apr;43(4):509-12 [PMID: 20462579]
  7. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Feb;92 (2):250-7 [PMID: 20130318]
  8. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jun;28(6):320-3 [PMID: 24603315]
  9. Acta Chir Belg. 2001 Nov-Dec;101(6):287-93 [PMID: 11868505]
  10. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Jan;84-A(1):1-9 [PMID: 11792772]
  11. Int Orthop. 2012 Dec;36(12):2411-8 [PMID: 23073926]
  12. HSS J. 2006 Sep;2(2):161-71 [PMID: 18751831]
  13. Injury. 2011 Oct;42(10):1144-51 [PMID: 20850738]
  14. J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):677-84 [PMID: 20838139]
  15. Injury. 2012 Dec;43 Suppl 2:S33-41 [PMID: 23622990]
  16. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1632-45 [PMID: 8934477]
  17. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Feb;(407):173-86 [PMID: 12567145]
  18. Injury. 2005 May;36(5):605-12 [PMID: 15826618]
  19. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Aug;73(4):275-82 [PMID: 17026887]
  20. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Oct;24(10):637-44 [PMID: 20871252]
  21. Unfallchirurg. 2004 Nov;107(11):1050-6 [PMID: 15322698]
  22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Dec;(297):28-32 [PMID: 8242945]
  23. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17 ):1559-67 [PMID: 22992846]
  24. Chin J Traumatol. 2006 Dec;9(6):341-4 [PMID: 17096928]
  25. Injury. 2010 Apr;41(4):396-9 [PMID: 20004894]
  26. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Mar;19(3):170-5 [PMID: 21368098]
  27. J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Mar;17 (3):193-7 [PMID: 12621260]
  28. Injury. 2008 Aug;39(8):914-21 [PMID: 18599057]
  29. Injury. 2012 Dec;43 Suppl 2:S28-32 [PMID: 23622988]
  30. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Jul;72(6):897-904 [PMID: 2114408]
  31. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 May;84-A(5):752-8 [PMID: 12004016]
  32. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999 Mar-Apr;7(2):128-41 [PMID: 10217820]
  33. J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Jan;12 (1):51-8 [PMID: 9447519]
  34. Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):11-6 [PMID: 24187344]
  35. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Apr;(205):230-40 [PMID: 3698382]
  36. Injury. 2011 Oct;42(10):985-91 [PMID: 21733513]
  37. Surg Clin North Am. 1984 Apr;64(2):269-85 [PMID: 6233733]
  38. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Dec;73(6):615-8 [PMID: 12553506]
  39. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Oct;91(10):1354-9 [PMID: 19794172]
  40. Bone Joint J. 2014 Feb;96-B(2):157-63 [PMID: 24493178]
  41. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 May;24(5):291-6 [PMID: 20418734]
  42. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954 Apr;36(A:2):307-14 [PMID: 13152140]
  43. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Aug;(305):112-23 [PMID: 8050220]
  44. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 6;97(9):758-68 [PMID: 25948523]
  45. Injury. 2014 Feb;45(2):356-61 [PMID: 24112700]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0acetabulartreatmentfracturehipoptionsreducingparadigmfracturesAlthoughtechnicallychallengingevenexperiencedsurgeonsimultaneousopenreductioninternalfixationORIFtotalreplacementTHRpotentialadvantagestraditionalspecificpatientsubgroupstheoreticallyallowingimmediateweightbearingfasterrehabilitationcostinpatientstayrisksearlylatelocalcomplicationsassociatedstandardtypeinjuryreviewevolutionindicationstechniquesoutlinesurgicalchallengesdiscussimplantoutcomesFixreplaceemergingtreatingfragilityarthroplastyosteoporosistrauma

Similar Articles

Cited By (9)