Long-term Outcomes After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis.

Paolo A Muraro, Marcelo Pasquini, Harold L Atkins, James D Bowen, Dominique Farge, Athanasios Fassas, Mark S Freedman, George E Georges, Francesca Gualandi, Nelson Hamerschlak, Eva Havrdova, Vassilios K Kimiskidis, Tomas Kozak, Giovanni L Mancardi, Luca Massacesi, Daniela A Moraes, Richard A Nash, Steven Pavletic, Jian Ouyang, Montserrat Rovira, Albert Saiz, Belinda Simoes, Marek Trnený, Lin Zhu, Manuela Badoglio, Xiaobo Zhong, Maria Pia Sormani, Riccardo Saccardi, Multiple Sclerosis–Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (MS-AHSCT) Long-term Outcomes Study Group
Author Information
  1. Paolo A Muraro: Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, England.
  2. Marcelo Pasquini: Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
  3. Harold L Atkins: Clinical Hematology, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  4. James D Bowen: Multiple Sclerosis Center, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington.
  5. Dominique Farge: Internal Medicine, Autoimmune and Vascular Diseases Unit, Unité Fonctionnelle 04, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Saint-Louis Hospital, Institut National de la Santé et de la Récherche Médicale Unité Mixte de Recherche 1160, Paris, France.
  6. Athanasios Fassas: Department of Hematology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  7. Mark S Freedman: Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  8. George E Georges: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle.
  9. Francesca Gualandi: Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy.
  10. Nelson Hamerschlak: Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
  11. Eva Havrdova: Department of Neurology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
  12. Vassilios K Kimiskidis: Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  13. Tomas Kozak: Department of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
  14. Giovanni L Mancardi: Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, and Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.
  15. Luca Massacesi: Department of Neurosciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy.
  16. Daniela A Moraes: Department of Clinical Medicine, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  17. Richard A Nash: Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver.
  18. Steven Pavletic: Experimental Transplantation and Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  19. Jian Ouyang: Department of Hematology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
  20. Montserrat Rovira: Hematology Service, Hospital Clinic and Neurology Service, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  21. Albert Saiz: Hospital Clinic and Institut d'Investigació August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  22. Belinda Simoes: Department of Clinical Medicine, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  23. Marek Trnený: Department of Medicine, Charles University General Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  24. Lin Zhu: Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  25. Manuela Badoglio: European Blood and Marrow Transplant Paris Office, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
  26. Xiaobo Zhong: Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
  27. Maria Pia Sormani: Biostatistics Unit, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.
  28. Riccardo Saccardi: Haematology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) may be effective in aggressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) that fail to respond to standard therapies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes in patients who underwent AHSCT for the treatment of MS in a large multicenter cohort.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained in a multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study. Eligibility criteria were receipt of AHSCT for the treatment of MS between January 1995 and December 2006 and the availability of a prespecified minimum data set comprising the disease subtype at baseline; the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at baseline; information on the administered conditioning regimen and graft manipulation; and at least 1 follow-up visit or report after transplant. The last patient visit was on July 1, 2012. To avoid bias, all eligible patients were included in the analysis regardless of their duration of follow-up. Data analysis was conducted from September 1, 2014 to April 27, 2015.
EXPOSURES: Demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related exposures were considered variables of interest, including age, disease subtype, baseline EDSS score, number of previous disease-modifying treatments, and intensity of the conditioning regimen.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were MS progression-free survival and overall survival. The probabilities of progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis models.
RESULTS: Valid data were obtained from 25 centers in 13 countries for 281 evaluable patients, with median follow-up of 6.6 years (range, 0.2-16 years). Seventy-eight percent (218 of 281) of patients had progressive forms of MS. The median EDSS score before mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells was 6.5 (range, 1.5-9). Eight deaths (2.8%; 95% CI, 1.0%-4.9%) were reported within 100 days of transplant and were considered transplant-related mortality. The 5-year probability of progression-free survival as assessed by the EDSS score was 46% (95% CI, 42%-54%), and overall survival was 93% (95% CI, 89%-96%) at 5 years. Factors associated with neurological progression after transplant were older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05), progressive vs relapsing form of MS (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.27-4.28), and more than 2 previous disease-modifying therapies (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.10-2.47). Higher baseline EDSS score was associated with worse overall survival (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.40-2.95).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this observational study of patients with MS treated with AHSCT, almost half of them remained free from neurological progression for 5 years after transplant. Younger age, relapsing form of MS, fewer prior immunotherapies, and lower baseline EDSS score were factors associated with better outcomes. The results support the rationale for further randomized clinical trials of AHSCT for the treatment of MS.

References

  1. Lancet. 2016 Aug 6;388(10044):576-85 [PMID: 27291994]
  2. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;86(2):208-15 [PMID: 24849515]
  3. J Clin Invest. 2014 Mar;124(3):1168-72 [PMID: 24531550]
  4. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997 Oct;20(8):631-8 [PMID: 9383225]
  5. Mult Scler. 2012 Jun;18(6):825-34 [PMID: 22383228]
  6. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Mar;8(3):244-53 [PMID: 19186105]
  7. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005 May;35(9):869-79 [PMID: 15765114]
  8. Clin Transpl. 2010;:87-105 [PMID: 21696033]
  9. Mult Scler. 2010 Jun;16(6):685-93 [PMID: 20350962]
  10. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;85(1):67-75 [PMID: 23486991]
  11. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jul;47(7):946-51 [PMID: 22056644]
  12. Haematologica. 2010 Feb;95(2):284-92 [PMID: 19773265]
  13. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jul;7(7):626-36 [PMID: 18565456]
  14. Neurology. 2011 Mar 22;76(12 ):1066-70 [PMID: 21422458]
  15. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Feb;14(2):132-3 [PMID: 25772884]
  16. Mult Scler. 2006 Dec;12(6):814-23 [PMID: 17263012]
  17. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Aug;16(8):1076-83 [PMID: 20304084]
  18. Mult Scler. 2012 Jun;18(6):835-42 [PMID: 22127896]
  19. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;85(10):1116-21 [PMID: 24554104]
  20. Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;7 Suppl 2:S96-104 [PMID: 17310341]
  21. JAMA Neurol. 2015 Feb;72(2):159-69 [PMID: 25546364]
  22. Neurology. 2015 Mar 10;84(10):981-8 [PMID: 25672923]
  23. J Exp Med. 2005 Mar 7;201(5):805-16 [PMID: 15738052]
  24. JAMA. 2015 Jan 20;313(3):275-84 [PMID: 25602998]
  25. Blood. 2011 Aug 11;118(6):1693-8 [PMID: 21596847]

Grants

  1. U10 HL069294/NHLBI NIH HHS
  2. U24 CA076518/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Child
Cohort Studies
Disability Evaluation
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Humans
International Cooperation
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Sclerosis
Transplantation, Autologous
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.01MSsurvival95%CIEDSSscoreAHSCTpatientsbaselinetransplantoverallyears2outcomestreatmentANDfollow-upanalysisageprogression-free65associatedHRAutologousstemformstherapiesmulticentercohortDataobtainedobservationalstudydatadiseasesubtypeconditioningregimenvisitconsideredpreviousdisease-modifying281medianrangeprogressiveneurologicalprogression03relapsingformIMPORTANCE:hematopoieticcelltransplantationmayeffectiveaggressivemultiplesclerosisfailrespondstandardOBJECTIVE:evaluatelong-termunderwentlargeDESIGNSETTINGPARTICIPANTS:retrospectiveEligibilitycriteriareceiptJanuary1995December2006availabilityprespecifiedminimumsetcomprisingExpandedDisabilityStatusScaleinformationadministeredgraftmanipulationleastreportlastpatientJuly2012avoidbiaseligibleincludedregardlessdurationconductedSeptember2014April272015EXPOSURES:Demographicdisease-relatedtreatment-relatedexposuresvariablesinterestincludingnumbertreatmentsintensityMAINOUTCOMESMEASURES:primaryprobabilitiescalculatedusingKaplan-MeiercurvesmultivariableCoxproportionalhazardsregressionmodelsRESULTS:Valid25centers13countriesevaluable02-16Seventy-eightpercent218mobilizationperipheralbloodcells5-9Eightdeaths8%0%-49%reportedwithin100daystransplant-relatedmortality5-yearprobabilityassessed46%42%-54%93%89%-96%Factorsolderhazardratio[HR]00-105vs3327-4286510-247Higherworse40-295CONCLUSIONSRELEVANCE:treatedalmosthalfremainedfreeYoungerfewerpriorimmunotherapieslowerfactorsbetterresultssupportrationalerandomizedclinicaltrialsLong-termOutcomesHematopoieticStemCellTransplantationMultipleSclerosis

Similar Articles

Cited By