People Are More Generous to a Partner Who Pays Attention to Them.

Yohsuke Ohtsubo, Chiaki Yamaguchi
Author Information
  1. Yohsuke Ohtsubo: 1 Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
  2. Chiaki Yamaguchi: 1 Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.

Abstract

People use relatively low-cost signals to maintain close relationships, in which they engage in costlier exchanges of tangible support. Paying attention to a partner allows an individual to communicate his or her interest in the relationship with the partner. Previous studies have revealed that when Person A pays attention to Person B, B's feeling of intimacy toward A increases. If social attention strengthens the bond between A and B, it is predicted that A's attention will also increase B's generous behavior toward A. This study tested this prediction. Participants first engaged in a collaborative task using computers. In the task, the putative partner (a computer program) either paid or did not pay attention to Participants (high attention condition vs. low attention condition). In the control condition, the partner could not choose when to pay attention to Participants. They then played three rounds of the dictator game with the partner. Confirming the previous finding, perceived intimacy was highest in the high attention condition, in the middle in the control condition, and lowest in the low attention condition. More importantly, Participants in the high attention condition decided to give more resources to their partner than those in the low attention condition (but the difference between the high attention condition and the control condition was not significant). In addition, self-reported intimacy was positively correlated with the resource allocated to the partner. The results of this study demonstrated that social attention fosters a partner's generosity.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;25(9):1699-711 [PMID: 25037961]
  2. Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 09;7:1137 [PMID: 27555824]
  3. Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390-6 [PMID: 7466396]
  4. Br J Psychol. 2012 May;103(2):149-68 [PMID: 22506741]
  5. PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316 [PMID: 20668659]
  6. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517-46 [PMID: 2402153]
  7. Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529 [PMID: 7777651]
  8. Science. 2007 Sep 7;317(5843):1347-51 [PMID: 17823344]
  9. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Sep 22;272(1575):1877-84 [PMID: 16191592]
  10. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:575-99 [PMID: 25061670]
  11. Sci Rep. 2014 Nov 11;4:6988 [PMID: 25384677]
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jun;72(6):1373-95 [PMID: 9177022]
  13. Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2016;44:353-364 [PMID: 27445430]
  14. Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):310-57 [PMID: 3901065]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Altruism
Attention
Communication
Cooperative Behavior
Female
Games, Experimental
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Japan
Male
Students

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attentionconditionpartnerintimacyhighsocialparticipantslowcontrolPeoplePersonBB'stowardstudytaskpaydictatorgamegenerosityuserelativelylow-costsignalsmaintaincloserelationshipsengagecostlierexchangestangiblesupportPayingallowsindividualcommunicateinterestrelationshipPreviousstudiesrevealedpaysfeelingincreasesstrengthensbondpredictedA'swillalsoincreasegenerousbehaviortestedpredictionParticipantsfirstengagedcollaborativeusingcomputersputativecomputerprogrameitherpaidvschooseplayedthreeroundsConfirmingpreviousfindingperceivedhighestmiddlelowestimportantlydecidedgiveresourcesdifferencesignificantadditionself-reportedpositivelycorrelatedresourceallocatedresultsdemonstratedfosterspartner'sGenerousPartnerPaysAttentionThemcommitmentsignal

Similar Articles

Cited By