Amplification on Undirected Population Structures: Comets Beat Stars.

Andreas Pavlogiannis, Josef Tkadlec, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin A Nowak
Author Information
  1. Andreas Pavlogiannis: IST Austria, Klosterneuburg, A-3400, Austria. pavlogiannis@ist.ac.at.
  2. Josef Tkadlec: IST Austria, Klosterneuburg, A-3400, Austria.
  3. Krishnendu Chatterjee: IST Austria, Klosterneuburg, A-3400, Austria.
  4. Martin A Nowak: Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.

Abstract

The fixation probability is the probability that a new mutant introduced in a homogeneous population eventually takes over the entire population. The fixation probability is a fundamental quantity of natural selection, and known to depend on the population structure. Amplifiers of natural selection are population structures which increase the fixation probability of advantageous mutants, as compared to the baseline case of well-mixed populations. In this work we focus on symmetric population structures represented as undirected graphs. In the regime of undirected graphs, the strongest amplifier known has been the Star graph, and the existence of undirected graphs with stronger amplification properties has remained open for over a decade. In this work we present the Comet and Comet-swarm families of undirected graphs. We show that for a range of fitness values of the mutants, the Comet and Comet-swarm graphs have fixation probability strictly larger than the fixation probability of the Star graph, for fixed population size and at the limit of large populations, respectively.

References

  1. J R Soc Interface. 2008 Nov 6;5(28):1279-89 [PMID: 18664425]
  2. Theor Popul Biol. 2006 Nov;70(3):352-63 [PMID: 16987535]
  3. J Math Biol. 2006 May;52(5):667-81 [PMID: 16463183]
  4. Genetics. 2003 Jun;164(2):767-79 [PMID: 12807795]
  5. J Theor Biol. 2007 Jun 7;246(3):522-9 [PMID: 17292423]
  6. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 May 15;280(1762):20130211 [PMID: 23677339]
  7. J Theor Biol. 2009 Aug 7;259(3):570-81 [PMID: 19358858]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2744-7 [PMID: 4527752]
  9. J Theor Biol. 2012 Nov 7;312:13-21 [PMID: 22846163]
  10. Nature. 2005 Jan 20;433(7023):312-6 [PMID: 15662424]
  11. Nature. 2004 Apr 8;428(6983):646-50 [PMID: 15071593]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 22;112(51):15636-41 [PMID: 26644569]
  13. Sci Rep. 2014 Oct 27;4:6692 [PMID: 25346111]
  14. J R Soc Interface. 2014 Oct 6;11(99):null [PMID: 25142521]
  15. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Apr 29;6(4):e1000758 [PMID: 20454464]
  16. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Nov 06;11(11):e1004437 [PMID: 26544962]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0probabilitypopulationfixationgraphsundirectednaturalselectionknownstructuresmutantspopulationsworkStargraphCometComet-swarmnewmutantintroducedhomogeneouseventuallytakesentirefundamentalquantitydependstructureAmplifiersincreaseadvantageouscomparedbaselinecasewell-mixedfocussymmetricrepresentedregimestrongestamplifierexistencestrongeramplificationpropertiesremainedopendecadepresentfamiliesshowrangefitnessvaluesstrictlylargerfixedsizelimitlargerespectivelyAmplificationUndirectedPopulationStructures:CometsBeatStars

Similar Articles

Cited By