Assessment of Dysfunctional Cognitions in Binge-Eating Disorder: Factor Structure and Validity of the Mizes Anorectic Cognitions Questionnaire-Revised (MAC-R).

Isabelle Carrard, Stephane Rothen, Maaike Kruseman, Yasser Khazaal
Author Information
  1. Isabelle Carrard: Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO) Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. Stephane Rothen: Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals Geneva, Switzerland.
  3. Maaike Kruseman: Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO) Geneva, Switzerland.
  4. Yasser Khazaal: Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals Geneva, Switzerland.

Abstract

Dysfunctional cognitions regarding weight and shape and their implications for self-esteem are considered core features of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. However, they have also been associated with the severity of binge eating disorder (BED). Therefore, they should be screened with appropriate instruments to tailor treatment to individual patient needs. The Mizes Anorectic Cognitions-Revised (MAC-R) is a self-report questionnaire that lists dysfunctional cognitions related to three hypothesized core beliefs typical of the psychopathology of eating disorders: weight and eating as the basis of approval from others; the belief that rigid self-control is fundamental to self-worth; and the rigidity of weight- and eating-regulation efforts. The goal of the study was to confirm the factor structure and to assess the validity of the MAC-R among a sample that met full-threshold and subthreshold criteria for BED. We used data of women meeting full-threshold ( = 94) and subthreshold ( = 22) criteria for BED to conduct confirmatory factor analyses and to compute Spearman's correlations, in order to assess factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity. Two models having a structure of three factors with or without a total score proved to be acceptable. The MAC-R total score was correlated with questionnaires assessing dimensions related to eating disorder psychopathology, adding to the validity of the questionnaire. These results were similar to those found in studies on the psychometric properties of the MAC among samples with anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa, encouraging the use of the MAC-R as a research or clinical tool in order to further document the core beliefs underlying BED.

Keywords

References

  1. Eat Weight Disord. 2006 Dec;11(4):e123-6 [PMID: 17272943]
  2. Int J Eat Disord. 2012 Nov;45(7):905-8 [PMID: 22576715]
  3. Behav Res Ther. 2009 Aug;47(8):692-6 [PMID: 19552897]
  4. Int J Eat Disord. 1998 Apr;23(3):233-42 [PMID: 9547658]
  5. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2011 Mar 04;7:8-18 [PMID: 21552482]
  6. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Dec;69(6):1066-72 [PMID: 11777111]
  7. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Oct;78(5):681-90 [PMID: 20873903]
  8. Addict Behav. 1990;15(2):153-63 [PMID: 2343789]
  9. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Aug;49(8):482-91 [PMID: 21641580]
  10. Addict Behav. 1992;17(3):283-9 [PMID: 1636475]
  11. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Mar;66:72-6 [PMID: 25701802]
  12. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1413-25 [PMID: 18848741]
  13. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012 Aug;14(4):432-46 [PMID: 22707016]
  14. Eat Behav. 2012 Jan;13(1):13-9 [PMID: 22177390]
  15. Psychol Med. 1979 May;9(2):273-9 [PMID: 472072]
  16. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Sep;72 :93-9 [PMID: 26209935]
  17. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Aug;71:110-4 [PMID: 26114779]
  18. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 03;15:70 [PMID: 25885566]
  19. Eat Behav. 2012 Apr;13(2):94-9 [PMID: 22365789]
  20. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Jan;33(1):95-105 [PMID: 7872943]
  21. Behav Res Ther. 2007 May;45(5):929-38 [PMID: 17010307]
  22. Schizophr Res. 2007 Mar;91(1-3):169-77 [PMID: 17306507]
  23. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 May 1;73(9):904-14 [PMID: 23290497]
  24. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Oct;52(5):863-72 [PMID: 6594356]
  25. Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46 [PMID: 2320703]
  26. Psychiatr Q. 2010 Mar;81(1):49-56 [PMID: 20039130]
  27. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Apr;46(4):428-37 [PMID: 18328464]
  28. Int J Eat Disord. 2001 Jul;30(1):11-27 [PMID: 11439405]
  29. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987 Aug;55(4):584-94 [PMID: 3624616]
  30. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Mar;18(3):499-504 [PMID: 19713949]
  31. Addict Behav. 1991;16(1-2):89-93 [PMID: 2048463]
  32. Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281-302 [PMID: 13245896]
  33. Addict Behav. 1989;14(5):589-94 [PMID: 2589139]
  34. Int J Eat Disord. 2000 Sep;28(2):235-41 [PMID: 10897088]
  35. J Clin Psychol. 2001 Jun;57(6):785-99 [PMID: 11344465]
  36. Int J Eat Disord. 2000 Dec;28(4):415-21 [PMID: 11054788]
  37. Eat Weight Disord. 2007 Dec;12(4):168-75 [PMID: 18227638]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MAC-RnervosaeatingBEDvaliditycoredisorderquestionnairefactorDysfunctionalcognitionsweightanorexiabulimiaseverityMizesAnorecticrelatedthreebeliefspsychopathologystructureassessamongfull-thresholdsubthresholdcriteria=ordertotalscoreCognitionsregardingshapeimplicationsself-esteemconsideredfeaturesHoweveralsoassociatedbingeThereforescreenedappropriateinstrumentstailortreatmentindividualpatientneedsCognitions-Revisedself-reportlistsdysfunctionalhypothesizedtypicaldisorders:basisapprovalothersbeliefrigidself-controlfundamentalself-worthrigidityweight-eating-regulationeffortsgoalstudyconfirmsamplemetuseddatawomenmeeting9422conductconfirmatoryanalysescomputeSpearman'scorrelationsfactorialconvergentdiscriminantTwomodelsfactorswithoutprovedacceptablecorrelatedquestionnairesassessingdimensionsaddingresultssimilarfoundstudiespsychometricpropertiesMACsamplesencouraginguseresearchclinicaltooldocumentunderlyingAssessmentBinge-EatingDisorder:FactorStructureValidityQuestionnaire-Revisedbinge-eatingcognitionanalysisstatistical

Similar Articles

Cited By