RNA Editing During Sexual Development Occurs in Distantly Related Filamentous Ascomycetes.

Ines Teichert, Tim A Dahlmann, Ulrich Kück, Minou Nowrousian
Author Information
  1. Ines Teichert: Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine und Molekulare Botanik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.
  2. Tim A Dahlmann: Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine und Molekulare Botanik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.
  3. Ulrich Kück: Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine und Molekulare Botanik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.
  4. Minou Nowrousian: Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine und Molekulare Botanik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.

Abstract

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process that modifies RNA molecules leading to transcript sequences that differ from their template DNA. A-to-I editing was found to be widely distributed in nuclear transcripts of metazoa, but was detected in fungi only recently in a study of the filamentous ascomycete Fusarium graminearum that revealed extensive A-to-I editing of mRNAs in sexual structures (fruiting bodies). Here, we searched for putative RNA editing events in RNA-seq data from Sordaria macrospora and Pyronema confluens, two distantly related filamentous ascomycetes, and in data from the Taphrinomycete Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Like F. graminearum, S. macrospora is a member of the Sordariomycetes, whereas P. confluens belongs to the early-diverging group of Pezizomycetes. We found extensive A-to-I editing in RNA-seq data from sexual mycelium from both filamentous ascomycetes, but not in vegetative structures. A-to-I editing was not detected in different stages of meiosis of S. pombe. A comparison of A-to-I editing in S. macrospora with F. graminearum and P. confluens, respectively, revealed little conservation of individual editing sites. An analysis of RNA-seq data from two sterile developmental mutants of S. macrospora showed that A-to-I editing is strongly reduced in these strains. Sequencing of cDNA fragments containing more than one editing site from P. confluens showed that at the beginning of sexual development, transcripts were incompletely edited or unedited, whereas in later stages transcripts were more extensively edited. Taken together, these data suggest that A-to-I RNA editing is an evolutionary conserved feature during fruiting body development in filamentous ascomycetes.

Keywords

References

  1. Genetics. 2014 Mar;196(3):729-44 [PMID: 24407906]
  2. Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 15;24(14):1650-1 [PMID: 18511468]
  3. BMC Genomics. 2012 Sep 27;13:511 [PMID: 23016559]
  4. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005 Apr;273(2):137-49 [PMID: 15778868]
  5. Genome Biol. 2013 Apr 25;14(4):R36 [PMID: 23618408]
  6. Trends Genet. 2010 May;26(5):221-30 [PMID: 20395010]
  7. Adv Genet. 2014;87:199-244 [PMID: 25311923]
  8. Genome Res. 2014 Mar;24(3):365-76 [PMID: 24347612]
  9. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:817-46 [PMID: 12045112]
  10. Genetics. 2014 Apr;196(4):1047-57 [PMID: 24496007]
  11. Bioessays. 2009 Oct;31(10):1137-45 [PMID: 19708020]
  12. Genome Biol. 2014 Jan 07;15(1):R5 [PMID: 24393560]
  13. Biochemistry. 2012 Jul 3;51(26):5235-42 [PMID: 22708551]
  14. Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9 [PMID: 19505943]
  15. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011 Feb;68(4):567-86 [PMID: 20938709]
  16. IUBMB Life. 2009 Jun;61(6):572-8 [PMID: 19472181]
  17. G3 (Bethesda). 2012 Feb;2(2):261-70 [PMID: 22384404]
  18. C R Biol. 2003 Oct-Nov;326(10-11):901-8 [PMID: 14744096]
  19. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Jan;19(1):450-60 [PMID: 9858569]
  20. Genetics. 1999 May;152(1):191-9 [PMID: 10224253]
  21. Nature. 2008 Jun 26;453(7199):1239-43 [PMID: 18488015]
  22. Bioinformatics. 2015 Feb 1;31(3):445-6 [PMID: 25294921]
  23. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(9):e1003820 [PMID: 24068976]
  24. BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Jan 29;15:4 [PMID: 25630791]
  25. Genome Res. 2016 Apr;26(4):499-509 [PMID: 26934920]
  26. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D1057-63 [PMID: 25378336]
  27. J Exp Biol. 2015 Jun;218(Pt 12):1812-21 [PMID: 26085659]
  28. Genome Res. 2012 Jan;22(1):142-50 [PMID: 21960545]
  29. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Oct 14;32(18):5539-45 [PMID: 15486203]
  30. Elife. 2015 Jan 08;4:null [PMID: 25569156]
  31. Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 30;5:4943 [PMID: 25266559]
  32. Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9 [PMID: 10802651]
  33. Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):409-13 [PMID: 15772668]
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Apr 15;48:613-6 [PMID: 13865603]
  35. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402 [PMID: 9254694]
  36. PLoS Genet. 2010 Apr 08;6(4):e1000891 [PMID: 20386741]
  37. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006 Apr;257(2):328-35 [PMID: 16553871]

MeSH Term

Ascomycota
Base Sequence
Fruiting Bodies, Fungal
Fungi
Fusarium
Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal
Mutation
RNA Editing
Schizosaccharomyces
Sexual Development
Sordariales

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0editingA-to-IRNAdatamacrosporaconfluensfilamentoussexualStranscriptsgraminearumfruitingRNA-seqascomycetesPdevelopmentfounddetectedrevealedextensivestructuresSordariaPyronematwopombeFwhereasstagesshowededitedbodypost-transcriptionalprocessmodifiesmoleculesleadingtranscriptsequencesdiffertemplateDNAwidelydistributednuclearmetazoafungirecentlystudyascomyceteFusariummRNAsbodiessearchedputativeeventsdistantlyrelatedTaphrinomyceteSchizosaccharomycesLikememberSordariomycetesbelongsearly-diverginggroupPezizomycetesmyceliumvegetativedifferentmeiosiscomparisonrespectivelylittleconservationindividualsitesanalysissteriledevelopmentalmutantsstronglyreducedstrainsSequencingcDNAfragmentscontainingonesitebeginningincompletelyuneditedlaterextensivelyTakentogethersuggestevolutionaryconservedfeatureEditingSexualDevelopmentOccursDistantlyRelatedFilamentousAscomycetesprotoperithecia

Similar Articles

Cited By