. This study investigated the impact of the different region of interest (ROI) approaches on measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the breast firbroglandular tissue (FT). . Breast MR images of 38 women diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer were studied. Percent density (PD) and ADC were measured from the contralateral normal breast. Four different ROIs were used for ADC measurement. The measured PD and ADC were correlated. . Among the four ROIs, the manually placed small ROI on FT gave the highest mean ADC (ADC = 1839 ± 343 [×10 mm/s]), while measurement from the whole breast gave the lowest mean ADC (ADC = 933 ± 383 [×10 mm/s]). The ADC measured from the whole breast was highly correlated with PD with = 0.95. In slice-to-slice comparison, the central slices with more FT had higher ADC values than the peripheral slices did, presumably due to less partial volume effect from fat. . Our results indicated that the measured ADC heavily depends on the composition of breast tissue contained in the ROI used for the ADC measurements. Women with low breast density showing lower ADC values were most likely due to the partial volume effect of fatty tissues.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jul;128(2):505-16
[PMID:
21258862]
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Dec;83(12):2137-43
[PMID:
25445896]
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81 Suppl 1:S1-3
[PMID:
23083544]
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Sep;17 (9):2268-74
[PMID:
18768492]
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 May;202(5):W496-502
[PMID:
24758685]
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2010 Sep;15(3):301-18
[PMID:
20811805]
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Feb;14 (2):343-9
[PMID:
15734956]
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jun;188(6):1622-35
[PMID:
17515386]
Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):227
[PMID:
22078026]
Radiographics. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):1059-84
[PMID:
21768239]
NMR Biomed. 2010 May;23(4):399-405
[PMID:
20131313]
Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8(2):R24
[PMID:
16646977]
Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Apr;28(3):320-8
[PMID:
20061111]
Med Phys. 2013 Dec;40(12):122301
[PMID:
24320532]
Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jan;28(1):8-15
[PMID:
19631485]
NMR Biomed. 1997 Oct;10(7):348-52
[PMID:
9471126]
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jan;131(1):267-75
[PMID:
21877142]
Jpn J Radiol. 2009 May;27(4):163-7
[PMID:
19499306]
Semin Cancer Biol. 2001 Apr;11(2):97-104
[PMID:
11322829]
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):805-11
[PMID:
24038529]
BMC Med. 2008 Apr 28;6:11
[PMID:
18442412]
Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Nov;29(9):1215-21
[PMID:
21920686]
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Nov;82(11):e662-8
[PMID:
24016824]
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Oct;14(4):433-8
[PMID:
11599068]
Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Feb;17 (1):e11-e18
[PMID:
27568102]
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Feb;69(2):545-52
[PMID:
23161434]
Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5253-62
[PMID:
19175084]
Cancer Cell. 2004 Jul;6(1):17-32
[PMID:
15261139]
Med Phys. 2011 Jan;38(1):5-14
[PMID:
21361169]
