Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Weight Efficacy Lifestyle among Women with Overweight and Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kamal Mirkarimi, Mohammad Javad Kabir, Mohammad Reza Honarvar, Rahman Berdi Ozouni-Davaji, Maryam Eri
Author Information
  1. Kamal Mirkarimi: Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
  2. Mohammad Javad Kabir: Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  3. Mohammad Reza Honarvar: Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
  4. Rahman Berdi Ozouni-Davaji: Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
  5. Maryam Eri: Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.

Abstract

Obesity and overweight have become increasingly a major public health problem across the world. This study aimed at exploring the effects of motivational interviewing on weight efficacy lifestyle among women with obesity and overweight. A single-blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 100 overweight and obese women who attended a nutrition clinic. The samples were selected based on the clinical records and assigned into two groups, namely motivational interviewing arm (50 samples) and nutrition education arm (50 samples). Data were collected using a standard validated questionnaire entitled "weight efficacy lifestyle". The intervention was designed according to five motivation sessions and four nutrition education programs, such that the participants of the nutrition education arm were also provided with the nutrition pamphlets related to weight control. Data were finally analyzed using the SPSS statistical software by performing the independent t-test, chi-square, LSD and repeated measures ANOVA tests. P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. The mean age of women was 39.9±9.1 and 36.3±8.9 years in the control and motivational interviewing arms, respectively. Compared with the control group, the score of the motivational interviewing group was statistically significant in terms of weight efficacy lifestyle P=0.0001) and all subscales including social pressure (P=0.0001), physical discomfort (P=0.005), food accessibility (P=0.0001), positive and entertainment activities (P=0.0001), as well as negative emotions (P=0.003). Motivational interviewing appeared to be effective in increasing weight efficacy lifestyle among women with overweight and obesity.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRCT2014051817736N1.

Keywords

References

  1. PeerJ. 2014 Sep 16;2:e565 [PMID: 25276501]
  2. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e23492 [PMID: 26380106]
  3. Eat Behav. 2009 Apr;10(2):134-6 [PMID: 19447358]
  4. Eat Behav. 2000 Sep;1(1):47-52 [PMID: 15001066]
  5. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Mar;105(3):441-4 [PMID: 15746833]
  6. Appetite. 2009 Jun;52(3):637-45 [PMID: 19501761]
  7. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):489-500 [PMID: 17258218]
  8. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Dec;20(12):2367-76 [PMID: 22673191]
  9. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 10;11:459 [PMID: 21663597]
  10. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Apr;108(4):640-7 [PMID: 18375220]
  11. BMC Public Health. 2009 May 29;9:167 [PMID: 19480675]
  12. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):304-12 [PMID: 17589283]
  13. J Nutr Educ. 2001 Nov-Dec;33(6):322-31 [PMID: 12031170]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interviewingP=0nutritionoverweightmotivationalweightefficacywomen0001lifestyleamongsamplesarmeducationcontrolMotivationalObesitystudyobesityclinical50DatausingstatisticallysignificantgroupOverweightbecomeincreasinglymajorpublichealthproblemacrossworldaimedexploringeffectssingle-blindrandomizedtrialconducted100obeseattendedclinicselectedbasedrecordsassignedtwogroupsnamelycollectedstandardvalidatedquestionnaireentitled"weightlifestyle"interventiondesignedaccordingfivemotivationsessionsfourprogramsparticipantsalsoprovidedpamphletsrelatedfinallyanalyzedSPSSstatisticalsoftwareperformingindependentt-testchi-squareLSDrepeatedmeasuresANOVAtestsP<005consideredmeanage399±91363±89yearsarmsrespectivelyComparedscoretermssubscalesincludingsocialpressurephysicaldiscomfort005foodaccessibilitypositiveentertainmentactivitieswellnegativeemotions003appearedeffectiveincreasingTRIALREGISTRATIONNUMBER:IRCT2014051817736N1EffectInterviewingWeightEfficacyLifestyleWomenObesity:RandomizedControlledTrialLifestyleMotivation

Similar Articles

Cited By