The Inhibitory Effects of Static Magnetic Field on from two Different Sources at Short Exposure Time.

Sofieh Mousavian-Roshanzamir, Ali Makhdoumi-Kakhki
Author Information
  1. Sofieh Mousavian-Roshanzamir: Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neishabour, Iran.
  2. Ali Makhdoumi-Kakhki: Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

This study was intended to investigate the effectiveness of static magnetic field on the growth of Escherichia coli () provided from two sources, the urine samples of patients with urinary tract infections and the reference strain ATCC 25922. Bacterial samples in Nutrient Broth were subjected to a range of magnetic intensities (2, 4, 6, 9, 14, 16, 18, and 20 mT) at various exposure times (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 min). The survival rate was measured in the presence and absence of the magnetic field over time. The cell counts of uropathogenic did not statistically differed from those of the standard strain if exposed to the magnetic field. The fluctuation was observed in cell viabilities at different magnetic intensities below 18 mT. Both groups presented a significant decline in survival rate as exposed to 18 and 20 mT.

Keywords

References

  1. Cell. 2007 Mar 23;128(6):1037-50 [PMID: 17382878]
  2. Can J Microbiol. 1979 Oct;25(10):1145-51 [PMID: 119572]
  3. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Dec;87(12):1155-61 [PMID: 21401315]
  4. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 May;29(4):302-11 [PMID: 18175330]
  5. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Jun 15;140(2-3):93-101 [PMID: 20471127]
  6. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009 May;30(4):270-9 [PMID: 19226539]
  7. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Jan;33(1):29-34 [PMID: 23713419]
  8. Ageing Res Rev. 2010 Apr;9(2):107-16 [PMID: 19874918]
  9. Med Hypotheses. 1997 Jul;49(1):31-4 [PMID: 9247904]
  10. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004 Aug 24;2:61 [PMID: 15327693]
  11. Sb Lek. 1998;99(4):455-64 [PMID: 10803288]
  12. Theriogenology. 2010 Jun;73(9):1293-305 [PMID: 20176397]
  13. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Mar 15;154(3):87-97 [PMID: 22257932]
  14. Pathophysiology. 2000 Jul;7(2):143-148 [PMID: 10927195]
  15. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Jul 2;157(2):259-66 [PMID: 22682582]
  16. Braz J Microbiol. 2012 Jan;43(1):375-81 [PMID: 24031842]
  17. Cytotherapy. 2013 Aug;15(8):961-70 [PMID: 23602580]
  18. Bioelectrochemistry. 2007 Jan;70(1):91-5 [PMID: 16713381]
  19. Int Microbiol. 2000 Mar;3(1):3-8 [PMID: 10963327]
  20. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2002 Jun;132(2):359-65 [PMID: 12031461]
  21. Int J Radiat Biol. 2003 Apr;79(4):281-6 [PMID: 12775452]
  22. Bioelectrochemistry. 2004 Jun;63(1-2):337-41 [PMID: 15110299]
  23. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;26(4):757-60 [PMID: 19813604]
  24. Int J Pharm. 2008 Nov 3;363(1-2):1-25 [PMID: 18682282]
  25. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015 Mar;34(1):14-8 [PMID: 24279632]
  26. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005 Sep 15;441(2):191-8 [PMID: 16126157]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0magneticfield18mTEscherichiacolitwosamplestractinfectionsstrainintensities20survivalratecellexposedMagneticstudyintendedinvestigateeffectivenessstaticgrowthprovidedsourcesurinepatientsurinaryreferenceATCC25922BacterialNutrientBrothsubjectedrange24691416variousexposuretimes0153045607590minmeasuredpresenceabsencetimecountsuropathogenicstatisticallydifferedstandardfluctuationobservedviabilitiesdifferentgroupspresentedsignificantdeclineInhibitoryEffectsStaticFieldDifferentSourcesShortExposureTimeIntensityUrinary

Similar Articles

Cited By