Radiative Energy Budgets of Phototrophic Surface-Associated Microbial Communities and their Photosynthetic Efficiency Under Diffuse and Collimated Light.

Mads Lichtenberg, Kasper E Brodersen, Michael Kühl
Author Information
  1. Mads Lichtenberg: Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen Helsingør, Denmark.
  2. Kasper E Brodersen: Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen Helsingør, Denmark.
  3. Michael Kühl: Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of CopenhagenHelsingør, Denmark; Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology SydneyUltimo, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

We investigated the radiative energy budgets of a heterogeneous photosynthetic coral reef sediment and a compact uniform cyanobacterial biofilm on top of coastal sediment. By combining electrochemical, thermocouple and fiber-optic microsensor measurements of O, temperature and light, we could calculate the proportion of the absorbed light energy that was either dissipated as heat or conserved by photosynthesis. We show, across a range of different incident light regimes, that such radiative energy budgets are highly dominated by heat dissipation constituting up to 99.5% of the absorbed light energy. Highest photosynthetic energy conservation efficiency was found in the coral sediment under low light conditions and amounted to 18.1% of the absorbed light energy. Additionally, the effect of light directionality, i.e., diffuse or collimated light, on energy conversion efficiency was tested on the two surface-associated systems. The effects of light directionality on the radiative energy budgets of these phototrophic communities were not unanimous but, resulted in local spatial differences in heat-transfer, gross photosynthesis, and light distribution. The light acclimation index, E, i.e., the irradiance at the onset of saturation of photosynthesis, was >2 times higher in the coral sediment compared to the biofilm and changed the pattern of photosynthetic energy conservation under light-limiting conditions. At moderate to high incident irradiances, the photosynthetic conservation of absorbed energy was highest in collimated light; a tendency that changed in the biofilm under sub-saturating incident irradiances, where higher photosynthetic efficiencies were observed under diffuse light. The aim was to investigate how the physical structure and light propagation affected energy budgets and light utilization efficiencies in loosely organized vs. compact phototrophic sediment under diffuse and collimated light. Our results suggest that the optical properties and the structural organization of phytoelements are important traits affecting the photosynthetic efficiency of biofilms and sediments.

Keywords

References

  1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Jun;1767(6):414-21 [PMID: 17207454]
  2. Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Jan;31(1):159-64 [PMID: 18028265]
  3. ISME J. 2010 Mar;4(3):440-9 [PMID: 19907503]
  4. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Sep;53(9):2142-50 [PMID: 16347435]
  5. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Dec;61(12):4215-22 [PMID: 16535178]
  6. Environ Microbiol. 2012 Apr;14(4):982-92 [PMID: 22176769]
  7. Photochem Photobiol. 2010 Sep-Oct;86(5):1076-83 [PMID: 20553406]
  8. Limnol Oceanogr. 1990;35(6):1343-55 [PMID: 11538698]
  9. J R Soc Interface. 2017 Mar;14 (128): [PMID: 28330986]
  10. Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 26;7:230 [PMID: 26955372]
  11. Am J Bot. 2007 Jul;94(7):1061-6 [PMID: 21636475]
  12. Limnol Oceanogr. 1988;33(1):99-113 [PMID: 11539749]
  13. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010 Dec 1;504(1):86-99 [PMID: 20638360]
  14. Photochem Photobiol. 2007 Jan-Feb;83(1):171-6 [PMID: 16922603]
  15. Nature. 2006 Aug 24;442(7105):854-5 [PMID: 16929264]
  16. Bacteriol Rev. 1977 Mar;41(1):100-80 [PMID: 860983]
  17. Front Microbiol. 2015 Jul 21;6:726 [PMID: 26257714]
  18. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005 Jun;382(3):559-69 [PMID: 15714301]
  19. Oecologia. 1974 Dec;17 (4):281-291 [PMID: 28308943]
  20. J R Soc Interface. 2014 Jan 29;11(93):20130997 [PMID: 24478282]
  21. Mol Microbiol. 2004 Aug;53(3):745-54 [PMID: 15255889]
  22. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:455-68 [PMID: 14502999]
  23. Front Microbiol. 2016 Jun 07;7:872 [PMID: 27375593]
  24. PLoS One. 2009 Nov 03;4(11):e7743 [PMID: 19888450]
  25. Plant Physiol. 2001 Apr;125(4):1558-66 [PMID: 11299337]
  26. Microb Ecol. 2000 Aug;40(2):94-103 [PMID: 11029078]
  27. J R Soc Interface. 2011 Dec 7;8(65):1785-95 [PMID: 21602322]
  28. EMBO J. 2001 Oct 15;20(20):5587-94 [PMID: 11598002]
  29. J R Soc Interface. 2017 Mar;14 (128): [PMID: 28250104]
  30. Methods Enzymol. 2005;397:166-99 [PMID: 16260291]
  31. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009 Mar;33(2):258-78 [PMID: 18834454]
  32. Appl Opt. 2003 Jul 1;42(19):3981-91 [PMID: 12868838]
  33. Plant Cell. 2001 Apr;13(4):793-806 [PMID: 11283337]
  34. J Exp Biol. 2014 Feb 15;217(Pt 4):489-98 [PMID: 24523498]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lightenergyphotosyntheticsedimentbudgetscoralbiofilmabsorbedphotosynthesisefficiencydiffusecollimatedradiativeheatincidentconservationreefcompactdissipationconditionsdirectionalityiephototrophichigherchangedirradiancesefficienciesinvestigatedheterogeneousuniformcyanobacterialtopcoastalcombiningelectrochemicalthermocouplefiber-opticmicrosensormeasurementsOtemperaturecalculateproportioneitherdissipatedconservedshowacrossrangedifferentregimeshighlydominatedconstituting995%Highestfoundlowamounted181%Additionallyeffectconversiontestedtwosurface-associatedsystemseffectscommunitiesunanimousresultedlocalspatialdifferencesheat-transfergrossdistributionacclimationindexEirradianceonsetsaturation>2timescomparedpatternlight-limitingmoderatehighhighesttendencysub-saturatingobservedaiminvestigatephysicalstructurepropagationaffectedutilizationlooselyorganizedvsresultssuggestopticalpropertiesstructuralorganizationphytoelementsimportanttraitsaffectingbiofilmssedimentsRadiativeEnergyBudgetsPhototrophicSurface-AssociatedMicrobialCommunitiesPhotosyntheticEfficiencyDiffuseCollimatedLightcanopyusemicrosensors

Similar Articles

Cited By