Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples.

Abyot Meaza, Abebaw Kebede, Zelalem Yaregal, Zekarias Dagne, Shewki Moga, Bazezew Yenew, Getu Diriba, Helina Molalign, Mengistu Tadesse, Desalegn Adisse, Muluwork Getahun, Kassu Desta
Author Information
  1. Abyot Meaza: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. abimeaza@gmail.com.
  2. Abebaw Kebede: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  3. Zelalem Yaregal: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  4. Zekarias Dagne: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  5. Shewki Moga: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  6. Bazezew Yenew: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  7. Getu Diriba: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  8. Helina Molalign: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  9. Mengistu Tadesse: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  10. Desalegn Adisse: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  11. Muluwork Getahun: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  12. Kassu Desta: Addis Ababa University College of Health Science Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) poses formidable challenges to TB control due to its complex diagnostic and treatment challenges and often associated with a high rate of mortality. Accurate and rapid detection of MDR-TB is critical for timely initiation of treatment. Line Probe Assay (LPA) is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test based on DNA-STRIP technology for the identification of the M. tuberculosis complex and its resistance to rifampicin (RMP) and/or isoniazid (INH). Hain Lifescience, GmbH, Germany has improved the sensitivity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA for the detection of MDR-TB; with the possibility of applying the tool in smear negative sputum samples.
METHOD: A cross sectional study was conducted on 274 presumptive MDR-TB patients referred to the National TB Reference Laboratory (NTRL), Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) who submitted sputum samples for laboratory diagnosis of drug resistant-TB testing. Seventy-two smear and culture positive samples processed in smear positive direct LPA category and 197 smear negative sputum samples were processed for direct LPA. Among the smear negative samples 145 (73.6%) were culture negative and 26 (13.2%) were culture positive. All specimens were processed using NALC-NaOH method and ZN smear microscopy done from sediments. Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 done from processed sputum sediments and the result was compared against the reference, BACTEC MGIT 960 culture and DST. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 assay was determined and P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 96.4, 100, 100 and 96.9%, respectively for the detection of MDR-TB from direct smear positive sputum samples. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDR plus VER 2.0 LPA were 77.8, 97.2, 82.4 and 97.2%, respectively, for the detection of M. tuberculosis from direct smear negative sputum samples. Fourteen (53.8%) samples had valid results with LPA among the 26 smear negative culture positive samples. The remaining 8 (30.8%) and 4 (15.4%) were invalid and negative with LPA, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 100% for the detection of MDR-TB among 14 direct smear negative and culture positive sputum samples. The most common mutations associated with RMP and INH resistance were S531L and S315TL, respectively. A single rare mutation (C15T/A16G) was detected for INH resistance.
CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA in direct smear positive sputum sample was highly sensitive and specific for early detection of MDR-TB. However, the diagnostic performance of this molecular assay in direct smear negative sputum sample was low and showed a high level of invalid results for detection of M. tuberculosis and its resistance to RMP and/or INH so it is unlikely to implement Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 for the detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sample in our routine settings. The sensitivity of the assay should be improved for detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sputum specimens.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Dec;8(12 Suppl):S17-29 [PMID: 21548184]
  2. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014 Jun;18(6):635-9 [PMID: 24903931]
  3. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1264-9 [PMID: 22301019]
  4. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 May;51(5):1606-8 [PMID: 23467605]
  5. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Apr;52(4):1052-9 [PMID: 24430455]
  6. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e88626 [PMID: 24586360]
  7. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 26;10:41 [PMID: 20187922]
  8. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(8):2635-40 [PMID: 17537937]
  9. Indian J Med Res. 2012 Dec;136(6):1044-7 [PMID: 23391803]
  10. J Glob Infect Dis. 2015 Apr-Jun;7(2):60-5 [PMID: 26069424]
  11. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3712-6 [PMID: 22972826]
  12. Eur Respir J. 2008 Nov;32(5):1165-74 [PMID: 18614561]
  13. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 May 20;10:123 [PMID: 20487550]

Grants

  1. D43 TW009127/FIC NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Antitubercular Agents
Bacterial Typing Techniques
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cytodiagnosis
Early Diagnosis
Ethiopia
Female
Genotype
Humans
Isoniazid
Male
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
Point Mutation
Rifampin
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sputum
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant

Chemicals

Antitubercular Agents
Isoniazid
Rifampin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0smearnegativeMDR-TB2sputumsamplesdetectionLPAVER0GenotypeMTBDRplusdirectpositiveculturesensitivitytuberculosisdiagnosticresistanceINHprocessedspecificityassayrespectivelyMRMPPPVNPV4sampledrugchallengesTBcomplextreatmentassociatedhighand/orimproved262%specimensdonesediments961008978%resultsamonginvalidperformanceBACKGROUND:MultiresistantposesformidablecontroldueoftenratemortalityAccuraterapidcriticaltimelyinitiationLineProbeAssayqualitativevitrotestbasedDNA-STRIPtechnologyidentificationrifampicinisoniazidHainLifescienceGmbHGermanypossibilityapplyingtoolMETHOD:crosssectionalstudyconducted274presumptivepatientsreferredNationalReferenceLaboratoryNTRLEthiopianPublicHealthInstituteEPHIsubmittedlaboratorydiagnosisresistant-TBtestingSeventy-twocategory197Among145736%13usingNALC-NaOHmethodZNmicroscopyresultcomparedreferenceBACTECMGIT960DSTSensitivitydeterminedP-value<005consideredstatisticallysignificantRESULTS:9%MTBDRplus7782Fourteen53validremaining30154%100%14commonmutationsS531LS315TLsingleraremutationC15T/A16GdetectedCONCLUSION:highlysensitivespecificearlyHowevermolecularlowshowedlevelunlikelyimplementroutinesettingsEvaluationgenotypelineprobePerformance

Similar Articles

Cited By (29)