Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Myopia in Inner Mongolia Medical Students in China, a cross-sectional study.

Lan Wang, Maolin Du, He Yi, Shengyun Duan, Wenfang Guo, Peng Qin, Zhihui Hao, Juan Sun
Author Information
  1. Lan Wang: Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 5, Xinhua Street, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 010110, China.
  2. Maolin Du: Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 5, Xinhua Street, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 010110, China.
  3. He Yi: Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 5, Xinhua Street, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 010110, China.
  4. Shengyun Duan: Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 5, Xinhua Street, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 010110, China.
  5. Wenfang Guo: Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 5, Xinhua Street, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 010110, China.
  6. Peng Qin: Hohhot University for Nationalities, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
  7. Zhihui Hao: Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
  8. Juan Sun: Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 5, Xinhua Street, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 010110, China. sj6840@163.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To further explore characteristics of myopia and changes in factors associated with myopia among students at Inner Mongolia Medical University.
METHODS: Two cross-sectional censuses were conducted in 2011 and 2013. Participants were medical students residing on campus in 2011 and 2013. Logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain associations with basic information, genetic factors, environmental factors. The χ test was used to test for differences in prevalence between 2011 and 2013. Prevalence was calculated at various myopia occurrence times among different parental myopia statuses.
RESULTS: A total of 11,138 students enrolled from 2007 to 2012 completed the questionnaire. The prevalence of myopia in 2011 and 2013 was 70.50% and 69.21%, respectively, no statistically significant difference existed between the two censuses (p = 0.12). Both censuses were completed by 1015 students. There were no differences among the various year of study in 2011 or 2013. Myopic prevalence increased with an increased number of myopic parents: the prevalence if both parents were myopic was over 90%, nearly 80% if one parent was myopic, and less than 70% with non-myopic parents (p < 0.001). Myopic occurrence ranked from earliest to latest was in kindergarten and primary school when both parents were myopic, in middle school when one parent was myopic, and in university when no parent was myopic. Students staying up late, using a computer more than 3 h per day, not performing eye exercises, using eye drops, and rubbing the eyes at high risk for myopia.
CONCLUSIONS: Myopic status was stable during the university period. Genetic factors play a major role in myopia. Protective measures are useful for university students.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;2(3):601-7 [PMID: 19668760]
  2. Ophthalmology. 2013 Oct;120(10):2100-8 [PMID: 23672971]
  3. Klin Oczna. 2005;107(7-9):468-70 [PMID: 16416999]
  4. Ophthalmology. 2008 Oct;115(10):1713-9 [PMID: 18486221]
  5. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;98(7):857-61 [PMID: 24515986]
  6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Nov 01;53(12):7504-9 [PMID: 23060137]
  7. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2008 Jan;2(1):77-81 [PMID: 21475475]
  8. Clin Genet. 2011 Apr;79(4):301-20 [PMID: 21155761]
  9. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;94(8):1012-6 [PMID: 20472747]
  10. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52668 [PMID: 23300738]
  11. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;126(8):1111-9 [PMID: 18695106]
  12. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;84(3):175-80 [PMID: 17435530]
  13. Eye (Lond). 2014 Feb;28(2):202-8 [PMID: 24406412]
  14. Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;4(6):658-69 [PMID: 22553740]
  15. BMC Med Genet. 2012 Aug 02;13:64 [PMID: 22857148]
  16. BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 17;13:42 [PMID: 23327195]
  17. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005 Jan;24(1):1-38 [PMID: 15555525]
  18. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012 May 16;7:20 [PMID: 22591602]
  19. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;127(12):1632-9 [PMID: 20008719]
  20. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):375-84 [PMID: 24168726]
  21. BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 30;3(12):e003900 [PMID: 24381255]

MeSH Term

China
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Myopia
Prevalence
Refraction, Ocular
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Students, Medical
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0myopiamyopicfactorsstudents20112013prevalenceamongcensusesPrevalenceoccurrenceMyopicparentsparentuniversityMyopiaInnerMongoliaMedicalcross-sectionaltestdifferencesvariouscompletedstudyincreasedoneschoolStudentsusingeyeBACKGROUND:explorecharacteristicschangesassociatedUniversityMETHODS:TwoconductedParticipantsmedicalresidingcampusLogisticregressionanalysisperformedascertainassociationsbasicinformationgeneticenvironmentalχusedcalculatedtimesdifferentparentalstatusesRESULTS:total11138enrolled20072012questionnaire7050%6921%respectivelystatisticallysignificantdifferenceexistedtwop = 0121015yearnumberparents:90%nearly80%less70%non-myopicp < 0001rankedearliestlatestkindergartenprimarymiddlestayinglatecomputer3 hperdayperformingexercisesdropsrubbingeyeshighriskCONCLUSIONS:statusstableperiodGeneticplaymajorroleProtectivemeasuresusefulFactorsAssociatedChinatimeParentRisk

Similar Articles

Cited By