Exploring Tactile Perceptual Dimensions Using Materials Associated with Sensory Vocabulary.

Maki Sakamoto, Junji Watanabe
Author Information
  1. Maki Sakamoto: Department of Informatics, The University of Electro-CommunicationsTokyo, Japan.
  2. Junji Watanabe: NTT Communication Science Laboratories, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone CorporationKanagawa, Japan.

Abstract

Considering tactile sensation when designing products is important because the decision to purchase often depends on how products feel. Numerous psychophysical studies have attempted to identify important factors that describe tactile perceptions. However, the numbers and types of major tactile dimensions reported in previous studies have varied because of differences in materials used across experiments. To obtain a more complete picture of perceptual space with regard to touch, our study focuses on using vocabulary that expresses tactile sensations as a guiding principle for collecting material samples because these types of words are expected to cover all the basic categories within tactile perceptual space. We collected 120 materials based on a variety of Japanese sound-symbolic words for tactile sensations, and used the materials to examine tactile perceptual dimensions and their associations with affective evaluations. Analysis revealed six major dimensions: "Affective evaluation and Friction," "Compliance," "Surface," "Volume," "Temperature," and "Naturalness." These dimensions include four factors that previous studies have regarded as fundamental, as well as two new factors: "Volume" and "Naturalness." Additionally, we showed that "Affective evaluation" is more closely related to the "Friction" component (slipperiness and dryness) than to other tactile perceptual features. Our study demonstrates that using vocabulary could be an effective method for selecting material samples to explore tactile perceptual space.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89008 [PMID: 24586480]
  2. Percept Psychophys. 2006 Jan;68(1):118-28 [PMID: 16617836]
  3. Somatosens Mot Res. 2005 Sep;22(3):127-40 [PMID: 16338822]
  4. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Oct;114(2):165-84 [PMID: 14529823]
  5. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 Nov;4(6):583-597 [PMID: 26304265]
  6. Psychol Bull. 1952 May;49(3):197-237 [PMID: 14930159]
  7. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2013 Jan-Mar;6(1):81-93 [PMID: 24808270]
  8. Front Neurorobot. 2012 Jun 21;6:5 [PMID: 22737122]
  9. Perception. 2012;41(2):204-20 [PMID: 22670348]
  10. Percept Psychophys. 2000 May;62(4):695-705 [PMID: 10883578]
  11. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Feb;34(2):192-203 [PMID: 19896001]
  12. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2017 Apr-Jun;10(2):173-182 [PMID: 28113407]
  13. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Jan;121(1):1-20 [PMID: 16055070]
  14. Exp Brain Res. 2002 May;144(2):211-23 [PMID: 12012159]
  15. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1996 Nov;32(6):561-79 [PMID: 8979934]
  16. Appetite. 2004 Oct;43(2):147-54 [PMID: 15458801]
  17. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2013 Feb;35(1):84-8 [PMID: 22970777]
  18. Percept Psychophys. 1993 Dec;54(6):697-705 [PMID: 8134240]
  19. Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1324-35 [PMID: 20851770]
  20. Somatosens Mot Res. 2007 Mar-Jun;24(1-2):53-70 [PMID: 17558923]
  21. Appl Ergon. 2007 Jan;38(1):53-63 [PMID: 16533495]
  22. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):103-22 [PMID: 19586243]
  23. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):531-50 [PMID: 21264727]
  24. Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 12;5:80 [PMID: 24575062]
  25. J Exp Psychol. 1965 Jul;70:18-26 [PMID: 14315125]
  26. Perspect Biol Med. 2001 Winter;44(1):17-31 [PMID: 11253302]
  27. Percept Psychophys. 2000 Nov;62(8):1534-44 [PMID: 11140177]
  28. Multisens Res. 2013;26(5):429-55 [PMID: 24649528]
  29. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):481-9 [PMID: 19304639]
  30. Q J Exp Psychol. 1969 Nov;21(4):346-55 [PMID: 5378275]
  31. Somatosens Mot Res. 1995;12(1):29-47 [PMID: 7571941]
  32. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2009 Mar 1;69(2):264-7 [PMID: 19124227]
  33. Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jan;216(1):123-34 [PMID: 22048319]
  34. Brain Res Bull. 2011 Jun 30;85(5):267-70 [PMID: 21440607]
  35. Cogn Psychol. 1987 Jul;19(3):342-68 [PMID: 3608405]
  36. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):95-111 [PMID: 21092921]
  37. Cogn Emot. 2011 Jun;25(4):717-25 [PMID: 21547772]
  38. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Jan;121(1):41-64 [PMID: 16098945]
  39. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Feb;124(2):177-89 [PMID: 16684497]
  40. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 May;12(2):169-80 [PMID: 2940321]
  41. Vision Res. 2010 Dec;50(24):2775-82 [PMID: 20937297]
  42. Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33 [PMID: 11807554]
  43. Chem Senses. 2016 Mar;41(3):197-203 [PMID: 26715523]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tactile"perceptualdimensionsmaterialsstudiesspacewordsproductsimportantfactorstypesmajorprevioususedstudyusingvocabularysensationsmaterialsamplesaffective"Affectiveevaluation"NaturalnessConsideringsensationdesigningdecisionpurchaseoftendependsfeelNumerouspsychophysicalattemptedidentifydescribeperceptionsHowevernumbersreportedvarieddifferencesacrossexperimentsobtaincompletepictureregardtouchfocusesexpressesguidingprinciplecollectingexpectedcoverbasiccategorieswithincollected120basedvarietyJapanesesound-symbolicexamineassociationsevaluationsAnalysisrevealedsixdimensions:Friction"Compliance"Surface"Volume"Temperatureincludefourregardedfundamentalwelltwonewfactors:"Volume"Additionallyshowedevaluation"closelyrelated"Friction"componentslipperinessdrynessfeaturesdemonstrateseffectivemethodselectingexploreExploringTactilePerceptualDimensionsUsingMaterialsAssociatedSensoryVocabularyfrictionsoundsymbolic

Similar Articles

Cited By