Evaluation of a multiprofessional, nonsurgical obesity treatment program: which parameters indicated life style changes and weight loss?

Roland Müller, Markus Laimer, Niels Hagenbuch, Kurt Laederach, Zeno Stanga
Author Information
  1. Pjanic: Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, University of Bern and University Hospital of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  2. Roland Müller: Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, University of Bern and University Hospital of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  3. Markus Laimer: Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, University of Bern and University Hospital of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  4. Niels Hagenbuch: Private statistician, Spiez, Switzerland.
  5. Kurt Laederach: Department of Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, University of Bern and University Hospital of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  6. Zeno Stanga: Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, University of Bern and University Hospital of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to the current evidence, behavior modifications are an effective part of a non-surgical multiprofessional obesity treatment program (MOTP). The purpose of the present study was to report changes in weight as well in psychological variables during a one year MOTP. We aimed to identify the associations of emotional state and patients' emotion regulation skills with weight change.
METHODS: Prospective interventional study. Data of participants attending the one year obesity treatment in either a group or individual structured MOTP were analyzed. Weight, BMI (Body Mass Index) and measures on psychosomatic variables, emotion regulation skills, affective state, shame and guilt were collected at baseline, after three months and after one year. Mixed-effects models were used for the statistical analysis of BMI.
RESULTS: We included 238 patients at baseline (t1), 234 after three months (t2) and 179 after one year (t3). A drop in BMI measurements of at least 5% was observed in 20.6% of participants at t2 and 41.4% of participants at t3. After three months, participants showed significant improvements in the following psychosomatic variables: somatisation ( < 0.001), interpersonal sensitivity ( < 0.001), emotion regulation skills ( < 0.01), and attention to emotions ( < 0.05). Most of the improvements could be maintained after one year. BMI reduction was associated with a positive change in emotions, improvements in emotion regulation skills, and a reduction of depressive symptoms, disgust and shame.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the assessment and treatment of psychological aspects like depression, emotion regulation skills, body awareness, and acceptance should be a vital part of an interdisciplinary MOPT.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethical approval for the present study was obtained from the Bern Kantonal Ethics Committee (KEK-Bern-Study Nr 258/14), Bern, Switzerland.

Keywords

References

  1. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010 Mar 25;316(2):104-8 [PMID: 19628019]
  2. JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):150-63 [PMID: 26757464]
  3. Internist (Berl). 2006 Feb;47(2):159-70 [PMID: 16416300]
  4. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Feb;37(1):58-69 [PMID: 19252962]
  5. BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 04;5(2):e006650 [PMID: 25652801]
  6. Psychol Bull. 1989 Mar;105(2):260-75 [PMID: 2648443]
  7. Soc Sci Med. 2014 Oct;118:152-8 [PMID: 25124079]
  8. Int J Eat Disord. 1993 Sep;14(2):171-83 [PMID: 8401550]
  9. J Pain Res. 2015 Jul 14;8:399-408 [PMID: 26203274]
  10. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003818 [PMID: 15846683]
  11. Eat Behav. 2015 Apr;17:74-6 [PMID: 25615911]
  12. Pediatr Int. 2004 Jun;46(3):296-301 [PMID: 15151546]
  13. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Jan 30;215(1):185-91 [PMID: 24200217]
  14. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2011 Sep-Oct;19(5):426-37 [PMID: 24081718]
  15. Appetite. 2008 Jan;50(1):1-11 [PMID: 17707947]
  16. NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Oct;(167):1-8 [PMID: 25321386]
  17. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2016 Jul;8(2):232-57 [PMID: 27140673]
  18. Phys Ther. 2003 Mar;83(3):276-88 [PMID: 12620091]
  19. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Jun;26(2):349-54 [PMID: 22077658]
  20. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Nov;46(11):1230-7 [PMID: 18835479]
  21. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Dec;69(6):1061-5 [PMID: 11777110]
  22. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jun;36(6):792-804 [PMID: 20460650]
  23. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Mar;60(3):237-43 [PMID: 16516654]
  24. Obes Rev. 2015 Feb;16 Suppl 1:67-76 [PMID: 25614205]
  25. Int J Eat Disord. 2007 Apr;40(3):195-203 [PMID: 17103418]
  26. Behav Ther. 2012 Jun;43(2):427-35 [PMID: 22440077]
  27. Obes Rev. 2016 Mar;17 (3):276-95 [PMID: 26693831]
  28. J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;39(1):139-50 [PMID: 26341357]
  29. J Clin Psychol. 1999 Jun;55(6):755-68 [PMID: 10445865]
  30. Prev Med. 2009 Nov;49(5):384-9 [PMID: 19695283]
  31. Prev Med. 2013 Dec;57(6):837-43 [PMID: 24075819]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0oneyearemotionregulationskillstreatmentparticipantsBMI< 0obesityMOTPstudyweightchangethreemonthsimprovementspartmultiprofessionalpresentchangespsychologicalvariablesstateWeightpsychosomaticshamebaselinet2t3001emotionsreductionBernstyleBACKGROUND:Accordingcurrentevidencebehaviormodificationseffectivenon-surgicalprogrampurposereportwellaimedidentifyassociationsemotionalpatients'METHODS:ProspectiveinterventionalDataattendingeithergroupindividualstructuredanalyzedBodyMassIndexmeasuresaffectiveguiltcollectedMixed-effectsmodelsusedstatisticalanalysisRESULTS:included238patientst1234179dropmeasurementsleast5%observed206%414%showedsignificantfollowingvariables:somatisationinterpersonalsensitivity01attention05maintainedassociatedpositivedepressivesymptomsdisgustCONCLUSIONS:resultsindicateassessmentaspectslikedepressionbodyawarenessacceptancevitalinterdisciplinaryMOPTTRIALREGISTRATION:EthicalapprovalobtainedKantonalEthicsCommitteeKEK-Bern-StudyNr258/14SwitzerlandEvaluationnonsurgicalprogram:parametersindicatedlifeloss?BehavioraltherapyLifebehavioralMultiprofessionalinterventionObesityloss

Similar Articles

Cited By