Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a strategy to transform surgical care across a health system.

Leah M Gramlich, Caroline E Sheppard, Tracy Wasylak, Loreen E Gilmour, Olle Ljungqvist, Carlota Basualdo-Hammond, Gregg Nelson
Author Information
  1. Leah M Gramlich: Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. lg3@ualberta.ca.
  2. Caroline E Sheppard: Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  3. Tracy Wasylak: Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  4. Loreen E Gilmour: Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  5. Olle Ljungqvist: Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
  6. Carlota Basualdo-Hammond: Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  7. Gregg Nelson: Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, 1331 29 Street NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to have a positive impact on outcome. The ERAS care system includes an evidence-based guideline, an implementation program, and an interactive audit system to support practice change. The purpose of this study is to describe the use of the Theoretic Domains Framework (TDF) in changing surgical care and application of the Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) model to analyze end-to-end implementation of ERAS in colorectal surgery across multiple sites within a single health system. The ultimate intent of this work is to allow for the development of a model for spread, scale, and sustainability of ERAS in Alberta Health Services (AHS).
METHODS: ERAS for colorectal surgery was implemented at two sites and then spread to four additional sites. The ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS) was used to assess compliance with the guidelines, length of stay, readmissions, and complications. Data sources informing knowledge translation included surveys, focus groups, interviews, and other qualitative data sources such as minutes and status updates. The QUERI model and TDF were used to thematically analyze 189 documents with 2188 quotes meeting the inclusion criteria. Data sources were analyzed for barriers or enablers, organized into a framework that included individual to organization impact, and areas of focus for guideline implementation.
RESULTS: Compliance with the evidence-based guidelines for ERAS in colorectal surgery at baseline was 40%. Post implementation compliance, consistent with adoption of best practice, improved to 65%. Barriers and enablers were categorized as clinical practice (22%), individual provider (26%), organization (19%), external environment (7%), and patients (25%). In the Alberta context, 26% of barriers and enablers to ERAS implementation occurred at the site and unit levels, with a provider focus 26% of the time, a patient focus 26% of the time, and a system focus 22% of the time.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the ERAS care system and applying the QUERI model and TDF allow for identification of strategies that can support diffusion and sustainment of innovation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery across multiple sites within a health care system.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Care. 2000 Jun;38(6 Suppl 1):I129-41 [PMID: 10843277]
  2. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):323-32 [PMID: 26757238]
  3. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):63-9 [PMID: 20738467]
  4. JAMA Surg. 2014 Sep;149(9):955-61 [PMID: 25054315]
  5. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 15;164(6):435-41 [PMID: 26903136]
  6. Healthc Manage Forum. 2015 Nov;28(6):262-4 [PMID: 26347481]
  7. Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42 [PMID: 21513547]
  8. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):313-22 [PMID: 26603969]
  9. Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):817-30 [PMID: 23079762]
  10. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117 [PMID: 24047204]
  11. World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1531-41 [PMID: 24368573]
  12. Implement Sci. 2008 May 29;3:30 [PMID: 18510750]
  13. Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):783-800 [PMID: 23099039]
  14. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281-315 [PMID: 11439467]
  15. Implement Sci. 2017 Jan 5;12 (1):2 [PMID: 28057049]
  16. Br J Surg. 2003 Dec;90(12):1497-504 [PMID: 14648727]
  17. Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;28(6):618-24 [PMID: 19535182]
  18. Gastroenterology. 2009 Mar;136(3):842-7 [PMID: 19135997]
  19. Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(6):435-42 [PMID: 23540823]
  20. Implement Sci. 2015 Jul 17;10:99 [PMID: 26183086]
  21. Br J Surg. 2005 Nov;92(11):1354-62 [PMID: 16237744]
  22. Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):700-12 [PMID: 26435444]
  23. Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):e221-7 [PMID: 27330358]
  24. Surg Endosc. 2004 Oct;18(10):1463-8 [PMID: 15791370]
  25. Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):1016-25 [PMID: 25692358]
  26. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jan;14(1):88-95 [PMID: 19779947]
  27. Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:38 [PMID: 22531013]
  28. World J Surg. 2016 May;40(5):1092-103 [PMID: 26928854]
  29. Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):571-7 [PMID: 21242424]
  30. Can J Surg. ;59(6):415-421 [PMID: 28445024]
  31. Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):93-138 [PMID: 17319808]
  32. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 5;372(6):497-500 [PMID: 25651242]
  33. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 7;157(3):207-10 [PMID: 22868839]
  34. Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17 [PMID: 22417162]

MeSH Term

Alberta
Colorectal Surgery
Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
Perioperative Care
Postoperative Care
Postoperative Complications
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Recovery of Function
Rectum

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ERASsystemcareimplementationfocusEnhancedRecoveryQUERImodelsites26%SurgerypracticeTDFcolorectalsurgeryacrosshealthsourcesenablerstimeimpactevidence-basedguidelinesupportDomainsFrameworksurgicalanalyzemultiplewithinallowspreadAlbertausedcomplianceguidelinesDataincludedbarriersindividualorganization22%providerImplementationBACKGROUND:programsshownpositiveoutcomeincludesprograminteractiveauditchangepurposestudydescribeuseTheoreticchangingapplicationQualityEnhancementResearchInitiativeend-to-endsingleultimateintentworkdevelopmentscalesustainabilityHealthServicesAHSMETHODS:implementedtwofouradditionalInteractiveAuditSystemEIASassesslengthstayreadmissionscomplicationsinformingknowledgetranslationsurveysgroupsinterviewsqualitativedataminutesstatusupdatesthematically189documents2188quotesmeetinginclusioncriteriaanalyzedorganizedframeworkareasRESULTS:Compliancebaseline40%Postconsistentadoptionbestimproved65%Barrierscategorizedclinical19%externalenvironment7%patients25%contextoccurredsiteunitlevelspatientCONCLUSIONS:UsingapplyingidentificationstrategiescandiffusionsustainmentinnovationSurgery:strategytransformTheoretical

Similar Articles

Cited By