The role of density-dependent and -independent processes in spawning habitat selection by salmon in an Arctic riverscape.

Brock M Huntsman, Jeffrey A Falke, James W Savereide, Katrina E Bennett
Author Information
  1. Brock M Huntsman: Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America. ORCID
  2. Jeffrey A Falke: U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America.
  3. James W Savereide: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America.
  4. Katrina E Bennett: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.

Abstract

Density-dependent (DD) and density-independent (DI) habitat selection is strongly linked to a species' evolutionary history. Determining the relative importance of each is necessary because declining populations are not always the result of altered DI mechanisms but can often be the result of DD via a reduced carrying capacity. We developed spatially and temporally explicit models throughout the Chena River, Alaska to predict important DI mechanisms that influence Chinook salmon spawning success. We used resource-selection functions to predict suitable spawning habitat based on geomorphic characteristics, a semi-distributed water-and-energy balance hydrologic model to generate stream flow metrics, and modeled stream temperature as a function of climatic variables. Spawner counts were predicted throughout the core and periphery spawning sections of the Chena River from escapement estimates (DD) and DI variables. Additionally, we used isodar analysis to identify whether spawners actively defend spawning habitat or follow an ideal free distribution along the riverscape. Aerial counts were best explained by escapement and reference to the core or periphery, while no models with DI variables were supported in the candidate set. Furthermore, isodar plots indicated habitat selection was best explained by ideal free distributions, although there was strong evidence for active defense of core spawning habitat. Our results are surprising, given salmon commonly defend spawning resources, and are likely due to competition occurring at finer spatial scales than addressed in this study.

References

  1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;54(8):774-81 [PMID: 11470385]
  2. Oecologia. 2003 Jun;136(1):1-13 [PMID: 12690550]
  3. Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Apr;9(2):129-36 [PMID: 1273796]
  4. Biometrics. 2004 Mar;60(1):108-15 [PMID: 15032780]
  5. J Anim Ecol. 2006 Sep;75(5):1100-9 [PMID: 16922845]
  6. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 7;273(1604):2917-24 [PMID: 17015363]
  7. Mol Ecol. 2006 Dec;15(14):4589-602 [PMID: 17107485]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 17;104(16):6720-5 [PMID: 17412830]
  9. Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(2):227-39 [PMID: 19484269]
  10. Ecology. 2009 Jul;90(7):1996-2006 [PMID: 19694146]
  11. J Anim Ecol. 2010 Mar;79(2):342-9 [PMID: 20002859]
  12. Ecology. 2010 Apr;91(4):1192-204 [PMID: 20462133]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 22;109(21):8185-9 [PMID: 22505739]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 23;110(17):6618-9 [PMID: 23572587]
  15. Ecol Evol. 2013 Jul;3(7):2233-40 [PMID: 23919165]
  16. J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jan;83(1):147-56 [PMID: 23931034]
  17. Oecologia. 2014 Feb;174(2):403-12 [PMID: 24100757]
  18. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e79232 [PMID: 24265762]
  19. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 11;9(3):e91673 [PMID: 24618602]
  20. J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):545-53 [PMID: 25283166]
  21. Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jul;21(7):2500-2509 [PMID: 25644185]
  22. J Therm Biol. 2015 Feb;48:11-20 [PMID: 25660625]
  23. Ecology. 2015 Jul;96(7):1793-801 [PMID: 26378302]
  24. Ecology. 2015 Oct;96(10):2823-33 [PMID: 26649402]
  25. Oecologia. 2016 Jul;181(3):841-51 [PMID: 27016079]
  26. Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):125-140 [PMID: 28568484]

MeSH Term

Alaska
Animals
Arctic Regions
Ecosystem
Models, Theoretical
Population Density
Population Dynamics
Salmon

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0spawninghabitatDIDDselectionsalmonvariablescoreresultmechanismsmodelsthroughoutChenaRiverpredictusedstreamcountsperipheryescapementisodardefendidealfreeriverscapebestexplainedDensity-dependentdensity-independentstronglylinkedspecies'evolutionaryhistoryDeterminingrelativeimportancenecessarydecliningpopulationsalwaysalteredcanoftenviareducedcarryingcapacitydevelopedspatiallytemporallyexplicitAlaskaimportantinfluenceChinooksuccessresource-selectionfunctionssuitablebasedgeomorphiccharacteristicssemi-distributedwater-and-energybalancehydrologicmodelgenerateflowmetricsmodeledtemperaturefunctionclimaticSpawnerpredictedsectionsestimatesAdditionallyanalysisidentifywhetherspawnersactivelyfollowdistributionalongAerialreferencesupportedcandidatesetFurthermoreplotsindicateddistributionsalthoughstrongevidenceactivedefenseresultssurprisinggivencommonlyresourceslikelyduecompetitionoccurringfinerspatialscalesaddressedstudyroledensity-dependent-independentprocessesArctic

Similar Articles

Cited By