Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes Compared with Degludec and Glargine on the Morning Injection: An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ryo Iga, Hiroshi Uchino, Ken Kanazawa, Shuki Usui, Masahiko Miyagi, Naoki Kumashiro, Hiroshi Yoshino, Yasuyo Ando, Takahisa Hirose
Author Information
  1. Ryo Iga: Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  2. Hiroshi Uchino: Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. h.uchino@med.toho-u.ac.jp. ORCID
  3. Ken Kanazawa: Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  4. Shuki Usui: Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Masahiko Miyagi: Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. Naoki Kumashiro: Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  7. Hiroshi Yoshino: Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  8. Yasuyo Ando: Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  9. Takahisa Hirose: Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Optimal adjustment of basal insulin to overcome hypoglycemia and glycemic variability (GV) depends on its duration of action and peak-less profile. Owing to the ability of long-acting basal insulin to avoid hypoglycemia, we titrated pre-meal glucose to normal fasting blood glucose, 80-110 mg/dL (4.5-6.1 mmol/L), and post-meal glucose to 80-140 mg/dL (4.5-7.8 mmol/L). The purpose of this study was to evaluate two basal insulin analogues degludec (IDeg) and glargine (IGlar), injected in the morning, for GV using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in type 1 diabetes (T1DM).
METHODS: In this crossover study, 20 Japanese patients with T1DM (age 54 ± 16 years, disease duration 16 ± 8 years, BMI 24 ± 4 kg/m, HbA1c 7.4 ± 0.8%) were randomized into one of two different starting regimens, and CGM was conducted on three consecutive days during the last week of each 12-week titration period. Treatment satisfaction was assessed at the end of each treatment period using the Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (DTR-QOL).
RESULTS: There were no differences in HbA1c, total insulin dosage, body weight changes, and basal to bolus ratio between the IDeg and IGlar arms. The day-to-day variability in fasting interstitial GV on the CGM curves was significantly less in the IDeg than IGlar treatment period (25.9 ± 22.0 vs. 43.8 ± 30.1 mg/dl, p = 0.04). Other markers of GV, calculated by the EasyGV software, including mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), J-index, total and nocturnal hypoglycemia were not different between the two treatment periods. The score of "satisfaction with treatment", a subdomain of the DTR-QOL system, was higher in the IDeg period.
CONCLUSION: Thus, the morning injection of the two long-acting insulin analogues seemed similar with regard to the magnitude of hypoglycemia in T1DM, but treatment with IDeg was associated with lower day-to-day variation in glucose level. These results suggest that IDeg is safe with minimal morning GV in patients with T1DM.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japanese Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000012358.

Keywords

References

  1. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Oct;14(10):944-50 [PMID: 22726241]
  2. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):659-65 [PMID: 24198302]
  3. Diabetes. 2010 Sep;59(9):2271-80 [PMID: 20547974]
  4. Pharm Res. 2012 Aug;29(8):2104-14 [PMID: 22485010]
  5. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Mar;100(3):902-10 [PMID: 25532041]
  6. Diabetes. 2015 May;64(5):1760-9 [PMID: 25488900]
  7. Horm Metab Res. 1995 Jan;27(1):41-2 [PMID: 7729793]
  8. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Dec;3(12):939-47 [PMID: 26432775]
  9. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51(3):509-11 [PMID: 24241339]
  10. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Jun;11 Suppl 1:S55-67 [PMID: 19469679]
  11. Cell Metab. 2014 Dec 2;20(6):1030-7 [PMID: 25470549]
  12. Acta Diabetol. 2015 Aug;52(4):639-47 [PMID: 25854196]
  13. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009 Sep;25 Suppl 1:S4-S10 [PMID: 19662621]
  14. Diabetes Ther. 2014 Jun;5(1):255-65 [PMID: 24888255]
  15. Diabetologia. 2006 Mar;49(3):442-51 [PMID: 16456680]
  16. Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1117-25 [PMID: 23250797]
  17. Diabetes Care. 2012 Nov;35(11):2140-7 [PMID: 22787177]
  18. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14 ):977-86 [PMID: 8366922]
  19. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):824-33 [PMID: 23445093]
  20. JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1681-7 [PMID: 16609090]
  21. Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1378-83 [PMID: 19429875]
  22. Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):817-20 [PMID: 22323414]
  23. JAMA. 2000 Dec 20;284(23):3043-5 [PMID: 11122593]
  24. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jul;37(7):1845-53 [PMID: 24784832]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0IDeginsulinGVglucosebasalhypoglycemiatwoT1DMperiodtreatmentvariabilityIGlarmorningCGM1glycemicdurationlong-actingfasting4studyanaloguesusingdiabetesJapanesepatientsHbA1cdifferentDiabetesDTR-QOLtotalday-to-dayGlycemicTypeDegludecGlargineINTRODUCTION:Optimaladjustmentovercomedependsactionpeak-lessprofileOwingabilityavoidtitratedpre-mealnormalblood80-110 mg/dL5-61 mmol/Lpost-meal80-140 mg/dL5-78 mmol/LpurposeevaluatedegludecglargineinjectedcontinuousmonitoringtypeMETHODS:crossover20age54 ± 16 yearsdisease16 ± 8 yearsBMI24 ± 4 kg/m74 ± 08%randomizedonestartingregimensconductedthreeconsecutivedayslastweek12-weektitrationTreatmentsatisfactionassessedendTherapy-RelatedQualityLifeQuestionnaireRESULTS:differencesdosagebodyweightchangesbolusratioarmsinterstitialcurvessignificantlyless259 ± 220vs438 ± 301 mg/dlp = 004markerscalculatedEasyGVsoftwareincludingmeanamplitudeexcursionsMAGEJ-indexnocturnalperiodsscore"satisfactiontreatment"subdomainsystemhigherCONCLUSION:ThusinjectionseemedsimilarregardmagnitudeassociatedlowervariationlevelresultssuggestsafeminimalCLINICALTRIALREGISTRATION:ClinicalTrialsRegistryUMIN000012358VariabilityComparedMorningInjection:Open-labelRandomizedControlledTrial

Similar Articles

Cited By