Relationship between nugent score and vaginal epithelial exfoliation.

Courtney P Amegashie, Nicole M Gilbert, Jeffrey F Peipert, Jenifer E Allsworth, Warren G Lewis, Amanda L Lewis
Author Information
  1. Courtney P Amegashie: Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
  2. Nicole M Gilbert: Center for Women's Infectious Disease Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
  3. Jeffrey F Peipert: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
  4. Jenifer E Allsworth: Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States of America.
  5. Warren G Lewis: Center for Women's Infectious Disease Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
  6. Amanda L Lewis: Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clue cells characteristic of bacterial vaginosis (BV) are thought to arise due to exfoliation of the vaginal epithelium; however, there is little published data connecting total numbers of epithelial cells to markers of BV. The purpose of this study was to enumerate exfoliated epithelial cells (independent of clue cells) and examine the relationship to Nugent score.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional sub-study of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project cohort. Vaginal swabs were used to create vaginal smears for Gram staining and these smears were later scored using the Nugent method, and then two blinded observers used microscopy to enumerate exfoliated epithelial cells. The degree of epithelial cell exfoliation was compared between women diagnosed as BV-negative (Nugent score 0-3), BV-intermediate (Nugent score 4-6), and BV-positive (Nugent score 7-10). BV specimens (Nugent 7-10) were randomly matched to specimens in the two other groups (Nugent low and Nugent-intermediate), in order to avoid comparing groups of women with potentially confounding baseline demographics.
RESULTS: Exfoliated epithelial cell counts were higher in the vaginal smears from BV-positive women compared with BV-negative women. Higher levels of epithelial exfoliation were also evident in BV-intermediate women compared to those with low Nugent scores. After adjustment for clustering introduced by matching, the incidence ratio of increased epithelial cell counts was 2.09 (95% CI 1.50-2.90) for the BV-intermediate women and 1.71 (95% CI 1.23-2.38) for the BV positive women.
CONCLUSION: A vaginal epithelial exfoliation phenotype was measured in both Nugent-defined BV-positive and BV-intermediate women. Bacterial vaginosis and intermediate status (Nugent score >3) was associated with significantly more vaginal epithelial exfoliation compared to women with Lactobacillus-dominated microbiotas (Nugent 0-3).

References

  1. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1741-8 [PMID: 20200290]
  2. Sex Transm Infect. 2014 Mar;90(2):161-4 [PMID: 24226098]
  3. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):297-301 [PMID: 1706728]
  4. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Sep;35(9):791-6 [PMID: 18607314]
  5. Microbes Infect. 1999 Apr;1(4):285-92 [PMID: 10602662]
  6. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 1;36(5):663-8 [PMID: 12594649]
  7. Contraception. 1998 May;57(5):341-8 [PMID: 9673842]
  8. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;100(3):456-63 [PMID: 12220764]
  9. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Feb;41(2):123-8 [PMID: 24413493]
  10. Contraception. 1999 Feb;59(2):91-5 [PMID: 10361623]
  11. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2001 Jan;5(1):7-11 [PMID: 17043555]
  12. Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Sep-Oct;12(5):856-72 [PMID: 2237129]
  13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1955 May;69(5):962-76 [PMID: 14361525]
  14. Int J STD AIDS. 2000 Sep;11(9):603-6 [PMID: 10997505]
  15. Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Nov;88(7):545-51 [PMID: 22628663]
  16. Contraception. 2000 Sep;62(3):149-54 [PMID: 11124363]
  17. Am J Med. 1983 Jan;74(1):14-22 [PMID: 6600371]
  18. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59539 [PMID: 23527214]
  19. J Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;160(3):490-6 [PMID: 2668431]
  20. Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):645-6 [PMID: 10877330]
  21. J Fam Pract. 1999 Nov;48(11):885-92 [PMID: 10907626]
  22. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;170(4):1048-59; discussion 1059-60 [PMID: 8166188]
  23. Sex Transm Dis. 1997 Apr;24(4):236-9 [PMID: 9101636]
  24. BJOG. 2002 Jan;109(1):34-43 [PMID: 11845812]
  25. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;13(1):31-5 [PMID: 16040325]
  26. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;205(2):113.e1-6 [PMID: 21514555]
  27. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(3):360-5 [PMID: 18307078]
  28. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec;167(6):1904-9 [PMID: 1471715]
  29. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Apr;35(4):363-7 [PMID: 18360319]
  30. Contraception. 2004 Aug;70(2):107-10 [PMID: 15288213]
  31. J Med Microbiol. 2014 Feb;63(Pt 2):162-75 [PMID: 24200640]
  32. BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 01;6:90 [PMID: 16740164]
  33. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Sep;56(9):862-6 [PMID: 14505771]
  34. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jan;32(1):176-86 [PMID: 8126176]
  35. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;201(1):76.e1-7 [PMID: 19371857]
  36. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Oct;37(10):588-90 [PMID: 12487930]
  37. J Infect Dis. 2010 Dec 15;202(12):1907-15 [PMID: 21067371]
  38. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7 [PMID: 20541171]
  39. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0135620 [PMID: 26266808]

Grants

  1. KL2 TR000450/NCATS NIH HHS
  2. R01 AI114635/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Cross-Sectional Studies
Epithelial Cells
Female
Humans
Vagina
Vaginal Smears
Vaginosis, Bacterial

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0epithelialNugentwomenexfoliationvaginalscorecellsBVcomparedBV-intermediatesmearscellBV-positive1vaginosisenumerateexfoliatedusedtwoBV-negative0-37-10specimensgroupslowcounts95%CIOBJECTIVE:CluecharacteristicbacterialthoughtarisedueepitheliumhoweverlittlepublisheddataconnectingtotalnumbersmarkerspurposestudyindependentclueexaminerelationshipSTUDYDESIGN:conductedcross-sectionalsub-studyContraceptiveCHOICEProjectcohortVaginalswabscreateGramstaininglaterscoredusingmethodblindedobserversmicroscopydegreediagnosed4-6randomlymatchedNugent-intermediateorderavoidcomparingpotentiallyconfoundingbaselinedemographicsRESULTS:ExfoliatedhigherHigherlevelsalsoevidentscoresadjustmentclusteringintroducedmatchingincidenceratioincreased20950-2907123-238positiveCONCLUSION:phenotypemeasuredNugent-definedBacterialintermediatestatus>3associatedsignificantlyLactobacillus-dominatedmicrobiotasRelationshipnugent

Similar Articles

Cited By