Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a single large Minnesota medical center in 2015 as assessed using MLST, core genome MLST and spa typing.

Kyung-Hwa Park, Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance, James R Uhl, Scott A Cunningham, Nicholas Chia, Patricio R Jeraldo, Priya Sampathkumar, Heidi Nelson, Robin Patel
Author Information
  1. Kyung-Hwa Park: Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
  2. Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance: Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
  3. James R Uhl: Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
  4. Scott A Cunningham: Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
  5. Nicholas Chia: Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
  6. Patricio R Jeraldo: Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
  7. Priya Sampathkumar: Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
  8. Heidi Nelson: Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
  9. Robin Patel: Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America. ORCID

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of bacteremia in hospitalized patients. Whether or not S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with clonality, implicating potential nosocomial transmission, has not, however, been investigated. Herein, we examined the epidemiology of SAB using whole genome sequencing (WGS). 152 SAB isolates collected over the course of 2015 at a single large Minnesota medical center were studied. Staphylococcus protein A (spa) typing was performed by PCR/Sanger sequencing; multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and core genome MLST (cgMLST) were determined by WGS. Forty-eight isolates (32%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The isolates encompassed 66 spa types, clustered into 11 spa clonal complexes (CCs) and 10 singleton types. 88% of 48 MRSA isolates belonged to spa CC-002 or -008. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates were more genotypically diverse, with 61% distributed across four spa CCs (CC-002, CC-012, CC-008 and CC-084). By MLST, there was 31 sequence types (STs), including 18 divided into 6 CCs and 13 singleton STs. Amongst MSSA isolates, the common MLST clones were CC5 (23%), CC30 (19%), CC8 (15%) and CC15 (11%). Common MRSA clones were CC5 (67%) and CC8 (25%); there were no MRSA isolates in CC45 or CC30. By cgMLST analysis, there were 9 allelic differences between two isolates, with the remaining 150 isolates differing from each other by over 40 alleles. The two isolates were retroactively epidemiologically linked by medical record review. Overall, cgMLST analysis resulted in higher resolution epidemiological typing than did multilocus sequence or spa typing.

References

  1. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec;41(12):5442-8 [PMID: 14662923]
  2. J Mol Diagn. 2016 Nov;18(6):923-932 [PMID: 27720647]
  3. J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jun;55(6):1946-1953 [PMID: 28404677]
  4. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22751 [PMID: 21799941]
  5. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jun;36(6):1653-9 [PMID: 9620395]
  6. Science. 2010 Jan 22;327(5964):469-74 [PMID: 20093474]
  7. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):874-9 [PMID: 23284029]
  8. JAMA. 2007 Oct 17;298(15):1763-71 [PMID: 17940231]
  9. MBio. 2015 Dec 08;6(6):e01888-15 [PMID: 26646014]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 17;95(6):3140-5 [PMID: 9501229]
  11. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 08;9(12):e114127 [PMID: 25485895]
  12. Infect Genet Evol. 2002 Dec;2(2):145-8 [PMID: 12797991]
  13. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Sep;50(9):3046-53 [PMID: 22785191]
  14. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Mar;33(3):551-5 [PMID: 7751356]
  15. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jul;52(7):2365-70 [PMID: 24759713]
  16. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 15;49(12):e130-8 [PMID: 19916797]
  17. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jul;44(7):2442-8 [PMID: 16825362]
  18. J Bacteriol. 2004 Mar;186(5):1518-30 [PMID: 14973027]
  19. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2267-75 [PMID: 22693998]
  20. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;13(8):698-708 [PMID: 23827369]
  21. J Bacteriol. 2003 Jun;185(11):3307-16 [PMID: 12754228]
  22. PLoS Med. 2010 Jan 12;7(1):e1000215 [PMID: 20084094]
  23. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Sep;19(9):803-13 [PMID: 23601179]
  24. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Mar;38(3):1008-15 [PMID: 10698988]
  25. Trends Biotechnol. 2010 Dec;28(12):611-8 [PMID: 20961641]
  26. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Nov 19;137(10):791-7 [PMID: 12435215]
  27. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Jul;68(7):1517-23 [PMID: 23515249]
  28. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Apr;21(4):347.e1-4 [PMID: 25658529]

MeSH Term

Aged
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacteremia
Female
Genome, Bacterial
Humans
Male
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Middle Aged
Minnesota
Molecular Epidemiology
Multilocus Sequence Typing
Phylogeny
Staphylococcal Infections
Staphylococcal Protein A
Staphylococcus aureus

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Staphylococcal Protein A

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0isolatesspaMLSTaureustypingMRSAStaphylococcusbacteremiaSSABgenomemedicalsequencecgMLSTtypesCCsepidemiologyusingsequencingWGS2015singlelargeMinnesotacentermultilocuscoresingletonCC-002MSSASTsclonesCC5CC30CC8analysistwoleadingcausehospitalizedpatientsWhetherassociatedclonalityimplicatingpotentialnosocomialtransmissionhoweverinvestigatedHereinexaminedwhole152collectedcoursestudiedproteinperformedPCR/SangerdeterminedForty-eight32%methicillin-resistantencompassed66clustered11clonalcomplexes1088%48belonged-008Methicillin-susceptiblegenotypicallydiverse61%distributedacrossfourCC-012CC-008CC-08431including18divided613Amongstcommon23%19%15%CC1511%Common67%25%CC459allelicdifferencesremaining150differing40allelesretroactivelyepidemiologicallylinkedrecordreviewOverallresultedhigherresolutionepidemiologicalMolecularassessed

Similar Articles

Cited By