Tattoo removal with ingenol mebutate.

Sarah-Jane Cozzi, Thuy T Le, Steven M Ogbourne, Cini James, Andreas Suhrbier
Author Information
  1. Sarah-Jane Cozzi: Inflammation Biology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane.
  2. Thuy T Le: Inflammation Biology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane.
  3. Steven M Ogbourne: Genecology Research Center, Faculty of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD, Australia.
  4. Cini James: Inflammation Biology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane.
  5. Andreas Suhrbier: Inflammation Biology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane.

Abstract

An increasing number of people are getting tattoos; however, many regret the decision and seek their removal. Lasers are currently the most commonly used method for tattoo removal; however, treatment can be lengthy, costly, and sometimes ineffective, especially for certain colors. Ingenol mebutate is a licensed topical treatment for actinic keratoses. Here, we demonstrate that two applications of 0.1% ingenol mebutate can efficiently and consistently remove 2-week-old tattoos from SKH/hr hairless mice. Treatment was associated with relocation of tattoo microspheres from the dermis into the posttreatment eschar. The skin lesion resolved about 20 days after treatment initiation, with some cicatrix formation evident. The implications for using ingenol mebutate for tattoo removal in humans are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancer Res. 2010 Jun 1;70(11):4509-19 [PMID: 20460505]
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975 Apr;55(4):401-5 [PMID: 1118499]
  3. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Mar;164(3):633-6 [PMID: 21375515]
  4. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2014 Dec;4(2):157-64 [PMID: 25159813]
  5. Cancer Res. 2004 May 1;64(9):3243-55 [PMID: 15126366]
  6. Cancer Res. 2004 Apr 15;64(8):2833-9 [PMID: 15087400]
  7. Ann Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;22(1):51-6 [PMID: 22153289]
  8. Blood. 1976 Apr;47(4):545-54 [PMID: 1260119]
  9. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Jan;28(1):83-6; discussion 86-7 [PMID: 11998793]
  10. Arch Dermatol. 1968 Nov;98(5):515-21 [PMID: 5684226]
  11. J Adolesc Health. 1996 Dec;19(6):420-5 [PMID: 8969374]
  12. Innate Immun. 2016 Jan;22(1):85-99 [PMID: 26608308]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 15;113(5):1380-90 [PMID: 15060350]
  14. West J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;12(4):393-8 [PMID: 22224126]
  15. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14(12):1969-78 [PMID: 26524598]
  16. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1010-9 [PMID: 22417254]
  17. Dermatol Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):319-25 [PMID: 17338690]
  18. J Dermatolog Treat. 2015 Oct;26(5):451-5 [PMID: 25672517]
  19. Am J Pathol. 2016 Jun;186(6):1511-23 [PMID: 27109612]
  20. Infect Immun. 1978 Dec;22(3):945-55 [PMID: 730386]
  21. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Apr;74(4):709-15 [PMID: 26810403]
  22. Arch Dermatol. 2001 Oct;137(10):1357-60 [PMID: 11594862]
  23. Australas J Dermatol. 2010 May;51(2):99-105 [PMID: 20546215]
  24. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;8(1):9-15 [PMID: 25949017]
  25. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011;42:97-110 [PMID: 21865802]
  26. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013 Jan;305(1):79-83 [PMID: 22871992]
  27. J Immunol. 2006 Dec 1;177(11):8123-32 [PMID: 17114487]
  28. Dermatol Surg. 2007 Sep;33(9):1082-91 [PMID: 17760599]
  29. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Jul;144(7):879-84 [PMID: 18645139]
  30. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153975 [PMID: 27100888]
  31. Lasers Med Sci. 2009 Nov;24(6):871-5 [PMID: 19597914]
  32. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2017;52:94-104 [PMID: 28288450]
  33. Br J Dermatol. 1999 Mar;140(3):483-5 [PMID: 10233271]
  34. Lancet. 2016 Jan 23;387(10016):395-402 [PMID: 26211826]
  35. J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Apr;132(4):1263-71 [PMID: 22189786]
  36. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017 Mar;10 (3):14-15 [PMID: 28360964]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mebutateremovaltattooingenoltreatmenttattooshowevercanincreasingnumberpeoplegettingmanyregretdecisionseekLaserscurrentlycommonlyusedmethodlengthycostlysometimesineffectiveespeciallycertaincolorsIngenollicensedtopicalactinickeratosesdemonstratetwoapplications01%efficientlyconsistentlyremove2-week-oldSKH/hrhairlessmiceTreatmentassociatedrelocationmicrospheresdermisposttreatmentescharskinlesionresolved20daysinitiationcicatrixformationevidentimplicationsusinghumansdiscussedTattoomouse

Similar Articles

Cited By