Cost-effectiveness of providing measles vaccination to all children in Guinea-Bissau.

Stine Byberg, Ane Bærent Fisker, Sanne Marie Thysen, Amabelia Rodrigues, Ulrika Enemark, Peter Aaby, Christine Stabell Benn, Ulla Kou Griffiths
Author Information
  1. Stine Byberg: a Bandim Health Project , Indepth Network , Bissau Codex , Guinea-Bissau.
  2. Ane Bærent Fisker: a Bandim Health Project , Indepth Network , Bissau Codex , Guinea-Bissau. ORCID
  3. Sanne Marie Thysen: a Bandim Health Project , Indepth Network , Bissau Codex , Guinea-Bissau.
  4. Amabelia Rodrigues: a Bandim Health Project , Indepth Network , Bissau Codex , Guinea-Bissau.
  5. Ulrika Enemark: d Department of Public Health, Centre for Global Health , Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark.
  6. Peter Aaby: a Bandim Health Project , Indepth Network , Bissau Codex , Guinea-Bissau.
  7. Christine Stabell Benn: a Bandim Health Project , Indepth Network , Bissau Codex , Guinea-Bissau.
  8. Ulla Kou Griffiths: e Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measles vaccination is associated with major reductions in child mortality and morbidity. In Guinea-Bissau, to limit vaccine wastage, children are only measles-vaccinated if at least six children aged 9-11 months are present at a vaccination session.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of providing measles vaccine (MV) to all children regardless of age and number of children present.
METHODS: We estimated MV coverage among children living in villages cluster-randomized to MV for all children and among children cluster-randomized to the current restrictive MV policy (status quo). Prices of MV and injection equipment were obtained from the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). Cost savings of hospital admissions averted were collected from a sample of health facilities. The non-specific mortality effects of MV were estimated and presented as deaths averted and life years gained (LYG) from providing MV-for-all.
RESULTS: MV coverage at 36 months was 97% in MV-for-all clusters and 84% in restrictive MV policy clusters. Conservatively assuming 90% wastage of MV under the MV-for-all policy and 40% under the restrictive MV policy, cost per child vaccinated was USD 3.08 and USD 1.19, respectively. The incremental costs per LYG and death averted of the MV-for-all policy were USD 5.61 and USD 148, respectively. The MV-for-all policy became cost-saving at 88% wastage.
CONCLUSIONS: Taking the low cost of MV and the beneficial non-specific effects of MV into consideration, a 10-dose MV vial should be reclassified as a '1+ dose vial'. The vial should be opened for a single child, irrespective of age, but can vaccinate up to 10 children.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccine. 1999 Oct 29;17 Suppl 3:S109-12 [PMID: 10559542]
  2. Science. 2000 Feb 18;287(5456):1207, 1209 [PMID: 10712155]
  3. BMJ. 2000 Dec 9;321(7274):1435-8 [PMID: 11110734]
  4. BMJ. 2005 Nov 19;331(7526):1177 [PMID: 16282378]
  5. Lancet. 2006 May 6;367(9521):1464-6 [PMID: 16679143]
  6. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Jan;86(1):27-39 [PMID: 18235887]
  7. BMJ. 2010 Nov 30;341:c6495 [PMID: 21118875]
  8. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 02;11:425 [PMID: 21635774]
  9. Health Care Manag Sci. 2012 Sep;15(3):188-96 [PMID: 22528136]
  10. BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 19;2(4):null [PMID: 22815465]
  11. Vaccine. 2012 Dec 17;31(1):96-108 [PMID: 23142307]
  12. J Infect Dis. 2014 Jun 1;209(11):1731-8 [PMID: 24436454]
  13. Lancet. 2014 Sep 13;384(9947):957-79 [PMID: 24797572]
  14. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 15;59(4):484-92 [PMID: 24829213]
  15. Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;43(3):645-53 [PMID: 24920644]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 28;111(43):15520-5 [PMID: 25288770]
  17. Risk Anal. 2016 Jul;36(7):1297-314 [PMID: 25545778]
  18. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2015 Aug 20;13:14 [PMID: 26300696]
  19. BMC Med. 2015 Sep 03;13:209 [PMID: 26335923]
  20. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Dec;34(12):1369-76 [PMID: 26379164]
  21. Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Jan;22(1):12-20 [PMID: 27717100]
  22. BMJ. 1995 Aug 19;311(7003):481-5 [PMID: 7647643]

MeSH Term

Child, Preschool
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Guinea-Bissau
Humans
Infant
Male
Measles
Measles Vaccine
Vaccination

Chemicals

Measles Vaccine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MVchildrenpolicyMV-for-allvaccinationUSDchildvaccinewastageprovidingrestrictiveavertednon-specificeffectsMeaslesmortalityGuinea-Bissaupresentincrementalcost-effectivenessmeaslesageestimatedcoverageamongcluster-randomizedLYGclusterscostperrespectivelyvialBACKGROUND:associatedmajorreductionsmorbiditylimitmeasles-vaccinatedleastsixaged9-11 monthssessionOBJECTIVE:estimateregardlessnumberMETHODS:livingvillagescurrentstatusquoPricesinjectionequipmentobtainedUnitedNationsChildren'sFundUNICEFCostsavingshospitaladmissionscollectedsamplehealthfacilitiespresenteddeathslifeyearsgainedRESULTS:36 months97%84%Conservativelyassuming90%40%vaccinated308119costsdeath561148becamecost-saving88%CONCLUSIONS:Takinglowbeneficialconsideration10-dosereclassified'1+dosevial'openedsingleirrespectivecanvaccinate10Cost-effectivenessbarriers

Similar Articles

Cited By